Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Film titles that are just people's names.

I think we ought to keep it to single words (first name only, or surname only) for an extra challange.

Lucy.
 
Doctor Who
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
OK, I know, I just wanted to take some of the heat away from Ms Whittaker :p
 
If there's not a film called 'Colin' I for one demand to know why not, and that the situation is rectified at the earliest opportunity :mad:
 
I have a sense of festering feminist injustice that where men's names are the title they're more likely to include an adjective, surname, or rank or status marker (John Wick, etc) ..... whereas women's names in titles are common as muck, even in the classics (Rebecca! Gilda! Frida! Emma! Hannah! Lore! etc etc etc) and far less likely to include a full name or an adjective or any more detail at all. Because all women are basically interchangeable while men are special and individual something something something?

(I'd be happy to be proved wrong on this one, btw.)
  • Morvern Callar
  • Veronica Guerin
  • Veronica Mars
  • Charlotte Gray
  • Foxy Brown
  • Jane Eyre
  • Annie Hall
  • Anna Karenina
  • Erin Brockovich
  • Jackie Brown
  • Barb Wire
  • Vera Drake
  • Elvira Madigan
  • Mildred Pierce
  • Calamity Jane
  • Stella Dallas
  • Marie Gallante
  • Norma Rae
  • Mary Poppins
 
^ a fine list DaveCinzano (and thanks for reminding me of many things I'd like to watch again) - but the argument is: Of ALL films whose titles are just a man/woman/animated character's name, are female characters more or less likely than male ones to have *just* a first name? I still think male characters are *more likely* to be given more distinguishing details. But I can't be bothered to do the stats to really find out ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom