Sunray
Its sunny somewhere.
Hocus Eye. said:I agree, the competition title is there to inspire photographs and can be interpreted in any way the photographer wants to go. For example my 'Pigs Might Fly' photograph is not a real living animal but is an image from a representation of one. The photoshopped deer is obviously a manipulated image so evidently no deception is intended. Why shouldn't this be allowed as a piece of creative image making?
In the 1850's many photographers e.g. HP Robinson, made pictures out of multiple negatives, it is not a new thing. 'Fading Away' was made from 5 negatives.
In the end the voters will decide what images they want, lets leave them to it.
Hocus
The only problem I have with image manipulation here is that not everyone has access or can use such manipulation techniques.
To enter the competition you have to be able to take a photograph. That therefore is all that should be allowed.
Otherwise we get into the semantics of what is a photograph? Its entirely possible for people to sit and draw a very lifelike animal with photoshop. Is that a photograph?