Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

February Photo Competition: Animals

If we're allowing 'birds of a feather' to be part of the competition, then disco dave's 'Chinese Dragons' should be allowed to enter too, I think. In fact, the subject is open to interpretation, so if peeps want to enter photos of bath ducks that's fine with me. :D

bride.jpg


(Just saying that because disco_dave_2000's entry is not on the thumbnails)

^^^ It's there now, or maybe it was there all along and I just missed it... :rolleyes: @ self...
 
This is my last entry, it's blurred and dark, but I like the fact that the fisherman's fly is open... :D (not in a sleazy way!!!! :mad: )

Taken in Brazil, 1997

fishfly

(e2a: photo has been cropped and clarified using Paint Shop Pro X)
 
Firky said:
Sorry, but I just had to post this :oops:

[
ahhh c'mon Firky thats really inconciderate ITS 170K AT LEAST 4 PAGES WORTH
what about the people on modem/dial up
You could have bothered to photoshop it so it was 25k or some thing or just put a link in
 
wiskey said:
i dont think the deer should be there at all :p and birds of a feather is a bit random too.

wiskers

why? :confused:
All i did was adjust it a little in photoshop - that is allowed isnt it?

;)
 
wiskey said:
i dont think the deer should be there at all :p and birds of a feather is a bit random too.

wiskers

I had a think about this and I don't think we should 'disqualify' entries, I think the subject should be open to interpretation and I also think that the more people entering the better...

I agree with you wiskey, from my interpretation, some entries don't quite fit the subject, but that's just my interpretation. Keeping that in mind, I will vote for the photos I think fit the theme... :cool:

What does everyone else think?
 
I agree, the competition title is there to inspire photographs and can be interpreted in any way the photographer wants to go. For example my 'Pigs Might Fly' photograph is not a real living animal but is an image from a representation of one. The photoshopped deer is obviously a manipulated image so evidently no deception is intended. Why shouldn't this be allowed as a piece of creative image making?

In the 1850's many photographers e.g. HP Robinson, made pictures out of multiple negatives, it is not a new thing. 'Fading Away' was made from 5 negatives.

In the end the voters will decide what images they want, lets leave them to it.

Hocus
 
Bernie Gunther said:
Heh, we have a cat a bit like that, only ours has a stupid looking pink nose.

link

PS, that wasn't an entry, just a gratuitious cat picture.

Love the expression on the cat's face! :D
 
andrewdroid said:
ahhh c'mon Firky thats really inconciderate ITS 170K AT LEAST 4 PAGES WORTH
what about the people on modem/dial up
You could have bothered to photoshop it so it was 25k or some thing or just put a link in

Is it that big? Sorry - I'm on a 12MB connection :oops:
 
Back
Top Bottom