I usually sit there from LJ too. I'm not sure they are any softer. They do have tables though. In the old trains, first was genuinely more comfortable than standard. Also, because it wasn't usually announced that first class is declassified, not so many people knew you were allowed to sit in them, so it was more fun doing so than it is now.What is going on with the First Class bits - do they have softer seats? I think maybe they do, that and the little antimacassars with the words First Class embroidered onto them, which make me feel quite important when I sit there (the trains that pass through LJ always announce that the first class carriage is not in use meaning anyone can use them).
I travelled on one for the first time yesterday. I found the seats no less comfortable than those in other trainsets. I don't remember seeing any tables; if there are none, that sucks a bit. A lot of information on the display panels including even load factors in each car (perhaps a bit pointless in an 'open plan' trainset as surely passengers will naturally spread along to occupy space more evenly).my review of the new ones: Seats are hard and uncomfortable, colours and atmosphere is sterile. Big windows though, which are good
eventually being about a weekI expect that any extra capacity will eventually just get filled up.
They are. I scientifically researched this the other day, think there's at least a third more softness in the first class seats, and also the headrest is broader and more cushioned.I'm not sure they are any softer.
I'll attempt to verify your findings on my next trip.They are. I scientifically researched this the other day, think there's at least a third more softness in the first class seats, and also the headrest is broader and more cushioned.
do you use the auld royal arse imperial measurement or the new eu commissioner's arse metric measure for the softness?They are. I scientifically researched this the other day, think there's at least a third more softness in the first class seats, and also the headrest is broader and more cushioned.
When they get the core up to 24tph, they really should add it to the tube map. St.P to London Bridge and Elephant, at least.
They're coming up here to replace our buses on rails
The North doesn't deserve new trains.
Well its not like you need the AC really.
The politics of railways in London are depressing
No it didn't.
No it didn't.
The train had a driver. It even said so further into the article. Misleading headline and inaccurate terminology as the press feel.it must dumb things down / sensationalize etc. for the masses else fear losing them.
What in fact happened is that Thameslink ran it's first ATO train.
Autocorrect now manually corrected.'Driverless' is in scare quotes which to me indicates it was not literally without driver.
You have a superfluous apostrophe in your last sentence.
No it didn't.
The train had a driver. It even said so further into the article. Misleading headline and inaccurate terminology as the press feel.it must dumb things down / sensationalize etc. for the masses else fear losing them.
What in fact happened is that Thameslink ran its first ATO train.
To me the quotes insinuate that people commonly refer to them as driverless.
So when headlines said the world was flat that was accurate was it?If that is the case, then the headline is accurate.
If people commonly referred to the world as flat, and a headline insinuated that people commonly referred to the world as flat, then that headline would be accurate, yes.So when headlines said the world was flat that was accurate was it?