Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

farewell tara palmer-tomkinson

One of the first on my radar for when asking "who is she, what does she do, why is she mentioned" you fail to get a good answer.

Ho hum move along they'll be another one along in a minute.
 
Spymaster said:
Well I've just been looking for it and can't find it past me ultimately agreeing with you that it had no probitive value and withdrawing that part of the argument. As I said, happy to revisit it if you can post or PM me a link to the part you mean.

To be clear, my current position is that the case shouldn't have been brought in the first place, and that the CofA shouldn't have allowed the new evidence that led to the second.
Click to expand...

Isn't that a bit contradictory?

'The case shouldn't have been brought in the first place', yet, the case was brought, and a guilty verdict returned.

You go on to say 'the CofA shouldn't have allowed the new evidence that led to the second'. Yet, without the new evidence, a man whom you felt shouldn't have been on trial in the first place, continues to be a convicted rapist.

I struggle to see the logic in that.
 
Thimble Queen said:
I wouldn't wish cancer or dementia on anyone (had both in my family, as it turns out my, not married to each other, uncle and aunt both died in the last four weeks - uncle due to cancer and my aunt after a long struggle with dementia) but I'm not sorry that thatcher suffered or that she died. I went to the thatchers dead parties, along with many others. Thatcher caused suffering to so many people so I think she's fair game. Its catharsis for some to celebrate and be glad. I can't see that with TPT she probably did more harm to herself than anyone else.
Click to expand...

It is not fair game. It is utter and contemptible hypocrisy.
 
Sasaferrato said:
Isn't that a bit contradictory?

'The case shouldn't have been brought in the first place', yet, the case was brought, and a guilty verdict returned.

You go on to say 'the CofA shouldn't have allowed the new evidence that led to the second'. Yet, without the new evidence, a man whom you felt shouldn't have been on trial in the first place, continues to be a convicted rapist.

I struggle to see the logic in that.
Click to expand...

Belboid and I have agreed to disagree on this so I'm not going to kick it all off again. It's too emotive to discuss rationally on here, and personally upsetting for several posters.
 
who to hate more -

posh lass, knows the royals, massive gear monster, but otherwise pleasant,

vs

guy who is born in poverty, zero privilege, beats his wife senseless every now and then, and is a cunt to his kids

which one is more worthy of scorn?

if the guy died would you be more sad than if the TPT-type woman died?
 
BigMoaner said:
who to hate more -

posh lass, knows the royals, massive gear monster, but otherwise pleasant,

vs

guy who is born in poverty, zero privilege, beats his wife senseless every now and then, and is a cunt to his kids

which one is more worthy of scorn?

if the guy died would you be more sad than if the TPT-type woman died?
Click to expand...


I have plenty of hate to go round.
 
Nah, it's traditional when celebs conk out. Will there be a horse drawn carriage at the funeral? Evens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pickman's model
so farewell frank dobson
Replies
16
Views
1K
tony.c
tony.c
gosub
Palmerston resigns!
Replies
10
Views
836
stavros
S
bemused
Quentin Tarantino defends Roman Polanski
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Nanker Phelge
Nanker Phelge
S
Kala Tara: the Asian Youth Movement and the fight against fascism in the 70s
Replies
6
Views
861
killer b
K
E
Let's say farewell to the 'ethnic minorities'
Replies
6
Views
674
TAE
T
Back
Top Bottom