Police have kettled a giant octopus on Whitehall and are marching it back to Trafalgar Square.
Clearly a Trojanhorseoctopus...
Almost 400 all-time high temperatures were set in the northern hemisphere over the summer, according to an analysis of temperature records.
The records were broken in 29 countries for the period from 1 May to 30 August this year.
What was the question again? What was the list?if you don't want to do entertaining distractions any more perhaps you could outline the lots of reasons you refused to list yesterday
I would hope that in the far flung future, people could be wrong, acknowledge it and adapt. Stridently opinionated rightness is a failing of the British psyche.So, after being told repeatedly by Hallam etc. that the only way to get social change is to get mass arrests, how are they going to adapt to something else? Are they even going to be able to given it'll be a complete about turn and admission they were wrong previously?
tbh i don't think they were necessarily wrong before: but they were wrong to believe that what worked once could be relied upon to work again. what's worked before (but not i think really been tried again) was what happened in the city on 18.6.99, when there were so many people spread over such a wide area and moving so quickly in many different directions that it was impossible to kettle and very difficult to break up. have as your metaphor smoke rather than water or dams. if xr had simply had loads of people wandering about in the roads in westminster, in the west end, they could have halted traffic and made it very difficult for the police to adequately respond. but by insisting again on camps which would last they showed a want of tactical nous.So, after being told repeatedly by Hallam etc. that the only way to get social change is to get mass arrests, how are they going to adapt to something else? Are they even going to be able to given it'll be a complete about turn and admission they were wrong previously?
So, after being told repeatedly by Hallam etc. that the only way to get social change is to get mass arrests...
what was that you were saying about superiority upthread?I would hope that in the far flung future, people could be wrong, acknowledge it and adapt. Stridently opinionated rightness is a failing of the British psyche.
let's hope they change tactics first, being as that's what's let them downDid Hallam repeatedly tell them that (granted, he certainly banged on a lot about non-violence)?
Also, it's quite possible that a lot of members of XR don't think he's the Messiah, and will be able to change strategy without a major mental breakdown.
if xr had simply had loads of people wandering about in the roads in westminster, in the west end, they could have halted traffic and made it very difficult for the police to adequately respond. but by insisting again on camps which would last they showed a want of tactical nous.
and these reasons are...You're saying that if it's critical then violence is the best approach. I would say that while there are always short cuts that can be achieved with violent or destructive action, at this stage I think XR are doing the right thing in keeping it avowedly non violent for lots of reasons.
there's no reason why, with so many people, they can't offer something for everyone. some people like blocking things, so they can do that. other people like walking about, so they can do that, and other people like - well, let them just get on with it without telling everyone and spoiling the surprise.Yeah, I'd heard this "be like water thing", so I'd figured the 'Occupy' style of things was done with.
and these reasons are...
and these reasons are...
there's no reason why, with so many people, they can't offer something for everyone. some people like blocking things, so they can do that. other people like walking about, so they can do that, and other people like - well, let them just get on with it without telling everyone and spoiling the surprise.
- Maintaining the moral high groundand these reasons are...
obvs j18 happened in a different political context, at the start of the era of summit-hopping. but there's lessons which can be taken from it in terms of presenting issues for public order policing. let's look at the things which have worked, things like mayday monopoly, things which accentuate the (few) advantages demonstrators have over the police. things like surprise, unpredictability and movement shouldn't be surrendered so readily, they've proven their worth over many years. blocking things? now and again it works, mostly it ends in tears.Given climate stuff is only going to get worse, and that the movements and groups trying to stop/mitigate it will likely grow as well, I do think it's worth trying to engage and help things take better directions. Even if some of the stuff they're doing is hard to deal with.
I think it's worth addressing what we mean by working or not with the action and tactical ideas isn't it? Like you referred to J18 Pickman's model but tbh I'd say that worked on some levels on the day, but didn't work on a wider political and strategic level maybe?
shit- Maintaining the moral high ground
well they really haven't done that, with the yoga and so on, they'd have been better off having a riot than making it a protest for people from particular strata of society.- broadening the appeal to otherwise non politically active people
tbh it matters not a jot what demonstrators do, and it matters very little what the government do, the media will spin it as they want, be that professional demonstrators or hypocritical demonstrators eating in mcd's or whatever they want to say. doing something because you think it will stop the government or even the media making it out to be x y or z is really really stupid. they'll say it anyway - for example, the way that it's having an impact on the police's ability to respond to emergencies elsewhere in london. if it's a good enough cause observers won't mind too much what the government say. i remember being in crouch end on 1.4.90 waiting for a phone box and talking to this black man in his 50s about the poll tax riot, and him saying how happy he was that young people still had it in them to fight the police. the poll tax riot/s didn't do the campaign the slightest bit of harm, even though politicians and the government spoke out most vehemently against them.- not letting the govt make it only a public order issue
i can see where you're coming from here but it's still not a really good reason.- letting the police make the first violent move in a world full of shared videos and live streams
not really, nowill that do?
that was perhaps the best action of the last few days and even that showed some lack of practice using the equipment.i dunno, i still find some of their actions suitably chaotic, even Banksy hasn't got a fire engine full of paint.
when was the last time people throwing things at coppers in england (or scotland or wales) faced any sort of retaliation from the military?The main one imo being that as soon as they deviate from that, then unless they have a massive amount of general goodwill and support behind them, the media will create the narratives necessary for huge pre-emptive retaliation by the police and military.
obvs j18 happened in a different political context, at the start of the era of summit-hopping. but there's lessons which can be taken from it in terms of presenting issues for public order policing. let's look at the things which have worked, things like mayday monopoly, things which accentuate the (few) advantages demonstrators have over the police. things like surprise, unpredictability and movement shouldn't be surrendered so readily, they've proven their worth over many years. blocking things? now and again it works, mostly it ends in tears.
but where j18 took 18 months to organise, xr have been putting this together in a few months. granted, they have more money and indeed more activists than there were back in the day. but they've also done it tactically cheap, without giving any real thought to countermeasures or mixing it up - what we used to call a diversity of tactics.
- Maintaining the moral high ground
- broadening the appeal to otherwise non politically active people
- not letting the govt make it only a public order issue
- letting the police make the first violent move in a world full of shared videos and live streams
Will that do?
their stated aim, their strategic objective, is to obtain changes in government policy.What I'm getting at is what's the driving stratgey behind the thing irrespective of their tactics? Are we really looking at lobbying the State to sort climate change out as a sole strategy and causing disruption as the tool to push this, or are we thinking there's something else going on?
My suspicion is that you would have to do a lot of mental recalculation if non violence is effective.the non-violence thing even though it sticks in my throat on the street. Of course it betrays a more liberal politics
In the self interest mortality vacuum we have with Johnson and trump, it might resonate.Having the moral high ground is shit politics, not anything to be encouraged.