T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
It's not a question of priority at all. It's a question of accepting that all type of road users should try to adhere to a set of rules designed for safety, rather than with a sense of entitlement in mind.Yet again showing how utterly backwards this thinking is.
Should we have cities designed for people? No, cars must have priority, everyone else must act according to the needs of traffic.
Mental.
Last I checked, cars are not allowed to ride in the pavement, and must adhere to travelling on the carriageway only, while pedestrians have the pavement all to themselves (or sometimes shared with cyclists) to travel safely from vehicles on the road. It is not backwards or oppressive in any way to suggest that on those occasions when a pedestrian needs to leave the pavement and cross the carriageway, they should look before doing so, instead of behaving as if drivers (or Tesla computers) are granted X-ray vision by God Almighty so pedestrians don't need to concern themselves with such trivialities as checking for incoming traffic before they suddenly materialise on the carriageway between two parked vans so nobody could see them until they merrily step onto the road.