Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Entirely unashamed anti car propaganda, and the more the better.

Yet again showing how utterly backwards this thinking is.

Should we have cities designed for people? No, cars must have priority, everyone else must act according to the needs of traffic.

Mental.
It's not a question of priority at all. It's a question of accepting that all type of road users should try to adhere to a set of rules designed for safety, rather than with a sense of entitlement in mind.

Last I checked, cars are not allowed to ride in the pavement, and must adhere to travelling on the carriageway only, while pedestrians have the pavement all to themselves (or sometimes shared with cyclists) to travel safely from vehicles on the road. It is not backwards or oppressive in any way to suggest that on those occasions when a pedestrian needs to leave the pavement and cross the carriageway, they should look before doing so, instead of behaving as if drivers (or Tesla computers) are granted X-ray vision by God Almighty so pedestrians don't need to concern themselves with such trivialities as checking for incoming traffic before they suddenly materialise on the carriageway between two parked vans so nobody could see them until they merrily step onto the road.
 
Seriously, listen to this. Tesla are nowhere near having self driving cars and are basically a fraudulent company.



This is bollocks.

Listen to what the guy says between -35.52 and -35.10; and then listen to what he says from -26.47 for aboout 20 waffly seconds.
 
This is bollocks.

Listen to what the guy says between -35.52 and -35.10; and then listen to what he says from -26.47 for aboout 20 waffly seconds.
Glad you listened! You’ll have to break it down for me though - is this the boring company bit? That’s obviously a shit idea and a complete failure.
 
Which affects about 0.0001% of pavement space in the UK.
That's not even true in London where it's actually 'illegal*' to park on the pavement.

*Illegal as in even if someone is arsed to give you a ticket you can normally get out of paying just by contesting it.
 
The fact he’s being filmed whilst using his phone and driving isn’t a great start - not really surprised you didn’t spot that tbh.

Why do you think he's driving? No doubt the van is propelled using a tow dolly, common in the movie industry for filming scenes in moving vehicles.
 
So what? Slow down.
Or they can simply cross the road at designated places to avoid any mishaps, instead of thinking the world revolves among them.

The sooner we start to educate people away from the breathtakingly stupid and appalling concept that pedestrians should not need to exercise caution or use common sense when crossing a road because the burden of responsibility should fall squarely on the other party, the more lives will be saved.

Should trains slow down to 5 mph at every single level crossing too, lest a pedestrian wishes to exercise their wish to walk across transport highways without bothering to check for incoming traffic as so many of them already do on roads? And if not, why?
 
Last edited:
There’s absolutely no way that Level 5 self-driving is anything close to five years away. I’m not convinced it is as close as 50 years away. And Teslas? Teslas are still absolutely shit at self-driving, e.g. they’ll still occasionally swerve towards oncoming traffic even on basic roads, let alone deal with anything genuinely complex.
 
Are the drivers all on steroids round there?

There is a passing space in the parking bays either side just needs one of them to yield. How would they get on in the countryside where plenty of lanes are only the width of one car?
 
Are the drivers all on steroids round there?

There is a passing space in the parking bays either side just needs one of them to yield. How would they get on in the countryside where plenty of lanes are only the width of one car?
Macho status bollocks - so much of it about.
 
Back
Top Bottom