The idea is that we look like every other vibrant nu-market and present a familiar face to the people buying the same stuff that they can buy in every other vibrant nu-market across the land.one of the new stall design they are proposing is "Gazebo-style pop-up vitabri stalls"
more bloody pop ups!
I could be wrong, but it seems that very nature of the changes proposed in these plans will lead directly to a reduction in market hustle and bustle, thus making way of the all-important al fresco coffee drinking spaces.There was a consultation stall on Station Road for a few weekends in June run by the architects. I posted about it on the June thread and i believe CH1 also went down to have a look.
Generally I thought the Electric Avenue proposals made sense in terms of improving circulation, although I wasn't sure about their proposals to make the junction of electric avenue and electric lane into an amenity area with benches - with the hustle and bustle of the market all around I can't see it as that sort of space.
The bit i didn't agree with was the Popes Road side of the plan, which would see the widening of the road and the removal of the toilets, south american butcher, and shop that sells useful stuff.
I could be wrong, but it seems that very nature of the changes proposed in these plans will lead directly to a reduction in market hustle and bustle, and thus making way of the all-important al fresco coffee drinking spaces.
But it's in the drawing!Short of evicting the tenants of all of the shop units on Electric and kicking off all the market traders to replace them all with artisanal stuff and arts and crafts i don't see it. Much as i like the chinese supermarket i can't see myself wanting to sit down with a coffee and read a paper outside it.
this to me sounds far more dodgy and destructive than pop. pop is what it is, a little side off ghetto. gentrify the market and you're basically surgically removing the heart and soul of hte place.
But it's in the drawing!
*orders artisan coffee
*unfolds style mag
*sucks on pipe
Those canopies aren't ever coming back.How much would actually cost to recreate the canopies? Probably not as much as one would think, within the overall budget. The street is of historical importance and it would be well worth it to restore it to its former glory.
If memory serves that consultation was on so-called Brixton Central - which currently seems to have gone into hiding.There was a consultation stall on Station Road for a few weekends in June run by the architects. I posted about it on the June thread and i believe CH1 also went down to have a look.
Generally I thought the Electric Avenue proposals made sense in terms of improving circulation, although I wasn't sure about their proposals to make the junction of electric avenue and electric lane into an amenity area with benches - with the hustle and bustle of the market all around I can't see it as that sort of space.
The bit i didn't agree with was the Popes Road side of the plan, which would see the widening of the road and the removal of the toilets, south american butcher, and shop that sells useful stuff.
The Electric Avenue scheme is a separate issue - funded by Townscape Heritage Initiative. That is only supposed to apply to the triangle containing Electric Avenue (bounded by Coldharbour Lane, Atlantic Road and Brixton Road), and the funding is supposed to be seed-type funding, getting some of the more decrepit buildings back into shape pour encourager les autres (or so I was led to believe).
That is a different programme altogether, see the description here: http://www.buildingconservation.com/articles/thi/thi.htmDoes this footprint also include Pope's Road? £121,000 is going towards Carl Turner Architects [pdf] to help 'facilitate' Impact Hub setting up at Pop Brixton. Or maybe this is covered geographically by the Brixton Road current location of Impact Hub at the Town Hall?
On closer inspection it looks from the document you posted that in Electric Avenue there are two things going on:Does this footprint also include Pope's Road? £121,000 is going towards Carl Turner Architects [pdf] to help 'facilitate' Impact Hub setting up at Pop Brixton. Or maybe this is covered geographically by the Brixton Road current location of Impact Hub at the Town Hall?
Maybe we should ask TED Brixton to invite a Lambeth Council regeneration officer to tell us what on earth they think they're doing (FREE talk of course).
Well yes - I've noticed one of the regeneration staff often spends time in the mornings and afternoons chatting to CT just outside the venue as it is.The perfect venue would be Pop. Branded T-shirts part of the complex T & C's in signing up. Image rights by default revert to Brixton Green.
Or maybe I am getting confused?
On closer inspection it looks from the document you posted that in Electric Avenue there are two things going on:
Building repairs/bringing upper floors back into useable condition (THI-Lottery)
Don't know about that - but in the case of Electric Ave there is an outside consultant/contractor involved, so presumably somebody has to pay for whatever work they do, or have done.I've just been told LB Lambeth has just broken its HLF Contract re. the Brockwell Park grant by pulling out of its agreed funding contribution, so this may be scrutinised a little more.
Continuing an existing service seems a less than rigorous type of matching. Still the ways things are going it might be the only way to be sure of having the bins emptied.I think the issue might be that HLF will ask what match funding sources have been secured (e.g. Lambeth continuing to run a street cleaning service) if any funding is to be agreed / released.