Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Donald Trump, the road that might not lead to the White House!

Status
Not open for further replies.
That disgusting piece in in radical Stokes Croft in Bristol and is clearly pro EU.
An "homagge" to this Berlin thing, I assume:

visitor-walks-past-a-mural-showing-former-soviet-leader-leonid-picture-id458093404
 
Is anyone arguing otherwise?. Clinton can hardly deny it. Trump is the one hoodwinking people with this outsider stuff.
It's an important point given that A) Trump is hoodwinking his people with his outsider stuff, and B) Clinton is hoodwinking people with her implicit claim that she will save AmeriKKKa from this "outrageous man", to quote Boney M.
 
Is it just me, or does Trump seem to have toned down the rhetoric now that he is the presumptive nominee? A few weeks back it was being widely argued that soon someone was going to get killed at one of his (Nuremburg) rallies. That seems to have dropped off the radar, at least for the moment.

Rhetoric toned down in case of possible imminent banning.
 
Trump's admitted strategy is to attack Hillary by attacking Bill's past. It plays well with the Repub base but I don't think it's going to work in the general. At least I hope not. Many of today's voters have no recollection of this stuff.
Donald Trump is reviving some of the ugliest political chapters of the 1990s with escalating personal attacks on Bill Clinton’s character, part of a concerted effort to smother Hillary Clinton’s campaign message with the weight of decades of controversy.

The real estate mogul has said in recent interviews that a range of Clinton-related controversies will be at the center of his case against Hillary Clinton.

“They said things about me which were very nasty. And I don’t want to play that game at all. I don’t want to play it — at all. But they said things about me that were very nasty,” Trump told The Washington Post.....“And, you know, as long as they do that, you know, I will play at whatever level I have to play at. I think I’ve proven that.”
Trump escalates attack on Bill Clinton
 
Why do you keep saying this like its a really important point?. Does going to a wedding mean you agree with the couples politics?

Well in their case they went primarily because they were paid by Trump to attend . But this is a case were trump is being portrayed, by the Clintons and others, of being a sort of nazi. If his politics were actually that distasteful and extreme then you'd expect them to pointedly not attend his wedding .

And I've posted links throughout this thread that the Clintons own positions on a few things Trumps been called out over are little different. If not worse . In fact he pretty much stole Hillarys clothes on both the Mexico wall and Obamas birth certificate. While Obamas been merrily deporting immigrants by the cart load...with Hillary heading up the State department and overseeing it . Again I have to point out that this is one massive opportunity for exposing liberal hypocrisy . It's absolutely fine when a Clinton or a Democrat does it. But Trump ? Aaargh !!!

Wtf is that all about ? It's crazy stuff. And some people on the left or liberal spectrum go clean mental when you point it out. Rattles whizzing clean out of the pram . Bizarre behaviour .
 
Is it just me, or does Trump seem to have toned down the rhetoric now that he is the presumptive nominee? A few weeks back it was being widely argued that soon someone was going to get killed at one of his (Nuremburg) rallies. That seems to have dropped off the radar, at least for the moment.

He admitted to Megan Kelly last week that he'd had to say a lot of unpleasant things he didn't agree with in order to get to were he is now , as part of " the game " as he puts it . The wall seems to be turning into a " floor " ..for negotiation. Like a few other things . Strikes me he was using WWE promoter tactics and the media fell for it hook line and sinker . It's possible they've copped onto that , that their scaremongering was counter productive , and now nobody is likely to die at a Trump rally after all . In fact the Democratrallies seem to be taking on a distinctly lairy air of late , with fears about the National convention. So it's a bit hard to ride both of those horses at the same time .

As for Nuremberg :facepalm:
 
Is it just me, or does Trump seem to have toned down the rhetoric now that he is the presumptive nominee? A few weeks back it was being widely argued that soon someone was going to get killed at one of his (Nuremburg) rallies. That seems to have dropped off the radar, at least for the moment.

Has he been holding many rallies lately? Seems like he has been largely confining himself to insulting people on Twitter since he wrapped up the nomination - but he's in California later this week for some rallies, so we'll probably be back to him saying whatever stupid shit comes off the top of his head while a bunch of angry old guys in baseball caps scream at protesters.
 
Well in their case they went primarily because they were paid by Trump to attend . But this is a case were trump is being portrayed, by the Clintons and others, of being a sort of nazi. If his politics were actually that distasteful and extreme then you'd expect them to pointedly not attend his wedding .
The genocidal, racist, rapist Clintons?
 
Has he been holding many rallies lately? Seems like he has been largely confining himself to insulting people on Twitter since he wrapped up the nomination - but he's in California later this week for some rallies, so we'll probably be back to him saying whatever stupid shit comes off the top of his head while a bunch of angry old guys in baseball caps scream at protesters.

I don't disagree for a minute with your description of him saying whatever stupid shit comes off the top of his head . No doubt about him doing that . But I think it's very wrong to portray his supporters like that . And frankly some of those protestors and their behaviour towards ordinary people leaves a lot to be desired . I've seen a few things that were well out of order . And most trump supporters just seem to ignore them . Trump may be ..is..a freak but they aren't . Most of them are just ordinary people . Albeit with the expected quota of loons in attendance too.
 
In addition to anti LGBT supporters, The Donald has other disturbing/extremist supporters. A partial list:
Sarah Palin
Ann Coulter (venomous right wing commentator)
Michael Savage (venomous right wing radio host)
Rush Limbaugh
Nigel Farange
NRA
New York Post (owned by Murdoch)
American Freedom Party (White Nationalist)
Jerry Falwell Jr.
Alex Jones
Ted Nugent (gun nut musician)

Hillary wins with her official KKK endorsement though.

Ku Klux Klan Grand Dragon Will Quigg Endorses Hillary Clinton for President

Apparently, among other things, they don't like Trumps hair, and suspect its a toupee . And they also believe she'll follow through on her previous promises to build a wall to stop the Mexicans . While doubting Trumps promises . I suspect they also approve of her and Bills mass incarceration programme directed at African Americans . Or " super predators " as she likes to call them .

They also claim to have donated 20,000 dollars to her campaign. Which she denies receiving . As she would .

Henry Kissinger endorses her too. As he would . aithníonn ciaróg ciaróg eile , as the saying goes .
 
Well in their case they went primarily because they were paid by Trump to attend . But this is a case were trump is being portrayed, by the Clintons and others, of being a sort of nazi. If his politics were actually that distasteful and extreme then you'd expect them to pointedly not attend his wedding .

...

I find it pretty weird for someone to be paying people to attend their wedding! Pay someone to do the food by all means, but whatsamatter Trump, not got any real friends?
 
Tomorrow Belongs to Trump.



The poor eejit who posted this parody song is now having to fend off (in the youtube comments) bigger eejits who think that it's a pro-Trump anthem.
 
Trump reckons that Hitlerys e mail woes could potentially mean he doesn't have to worry about running against Clinton , as she mightn't be around . Instead he's talking about running against " crazy Bernie " ...which isn't any type of insult at all coming from fucking Trump . In fact it actually doesn't appear to be . He says " a crazy man ..that's alright we like crazy people " :eek:. Sanders seems to be the only other person in the presidential race Trump hasn't called a goat molester or whatever . Just as well as he's nicking swathes of his platform .

Trump: Hillary Got Some Bad News About Her Emails Today

that'd be the best outcome all round . Baby killer Clinton sent to clink, Sanders win . No need for a bonkers alternative to unadulterated evil .
 
Bernie vs Trump is apparently on. Trump floated the idea on Kimmel, Bernie responded in the affirmative via twitter.

Now if he pulls out, I think we know he was running his mouth, but I think this was planned. Bernie has given up being nice about Hillary, Trump wants an hour long Hillary insult fest with the insinuation that Bernie is being screwed out of the primary planted firmly in democratic voters' minds.
 
Bernie vs Trump is apparently on. Trump floated the idea on Kimmel, Bernie responded in the affirmative via twitter.

Now if he pulls out, I think we know he was running his mouth, but I think this was planned. Bernie has given up being nice about Hillary, Trump wants an hour long Hillary insult fest with the insinuation that Bernie is being screwed out of the primary planted firmly in democratic voters' minds.


This is going to be great - Trump and Sanders grew up in New York City at roughly about the same time, about 15 miles from each other, making Sanders ideally placed to show Trump to be the bratty little putz he is and always has been.
 
Sanders will lose, he has made a mistake, this is not his forte, Trump will brush aside Sanders, make him look ineffectual, like those two female BLM activists did, Trump will come over all "Common-sense" and Leadership, Bernie will look weak, more like a unworldly University Lecturer than a Dynamic Leader.
 
Sanders will lose, he has made a mistake, this is not his forte, Trump will brush aside Sanders, make him look ineffectual, like those two female BLM activists did, Trump will come over all "Common-sense" and Leadership, Bernie will look weak, more like a unworldly University Lecturer than a Dynamic Leader.

I don't think so, the reason he looked weak with the blm activists is that he ceded the platform because he knew that doing anything else would look bad. I think that Bernie will do a lot better at getting down and dirty and fighting with Trump on his own terms than Hillary Clinton will.

In any case, so what? At this point he has nothing to lose.
 
I don't think so, the reason he looked weak with the blm activists is that he ceded the platform because he knew that doing anything else would look bad. I think that Bernie will do a lot better at getting down and dirty and fighting with Trump on his own terms than Hillary Clinton will.

In any case, so what? At this point he has nothing to lose.

Basically this, it's a Hail Mary to get himself back in the game.

Plus the visual of only the 2 of them debating hurts Clinton massively.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom