society encourages a craven attitude to authority 'please sir, can I have another slap?'
No man escapes when freedom fails;
The best men rot in filthy jails.
And those that cried "Appease! Appease"!
Are hanged by those they tried to please.
The name kettling and the technique came about because of the clearances of Jewish ghettos.
Nice.
Someone has put up a quite corrupted image suggesting that he is AB 42
http://publish.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/04/427427.html?c=on#c220573
The name kettling and the technique came about because of the clearances of Jewish ghettos.
Nice.
It is against the law for officers to slap women across the face. Police are not allowed to cover up their numbers. Police are not allowed to strike people who present no threat.
equally tactful was the fact the G20 policing operation was called operation glencoe
Again,selective blindness.She clearly punched him in the back
His striking her in the face, however, is no part of any officially-sanctioned control & restraint technique.
just watched that video again and if you look at the the end one of the FIT coppers present, who once again did nothing to intervene and presumably didnt report the matter, is Steve Discombe
he does get around
I think this thread needs a name change - now it's got onto the news people will be wanting to find a thread about it.
Are those gloves standard issue or are they another accessory like the balaclava on the pc who pushed Ian Tomlinson?
Accessorising and covering their numbers . . . it encourages rogue behaviour.
3:40 onwards.Shoves him off camera,then tries to hit him again and he blocks her,then hits him again and he allegedley slaps her.All whilst been pushed and shoved from all sides
If they weren't standard issue
It just makes me very cross that people defend this stuff.
Hope you don't mean me.
Oh no, I was just generally ranting.
It is against the law for officers to slap women across the face. Police are not allowed to cover up their numbers. Police are not allowed to strike people who present no threat.
So that makes you wrong, wrong and wrong.
equally tactful was the fact the G20 policing operation was called operation glencoe
The rule used to be (and should still be) "no blows above the shoulders", as there's far too much risk of damage involved in doing so. There are no control or restraint techniques allowed by the Home Office for use by police or Prison Service employees that includes striking to the face.I think the consideration is "reasonable force". The case I suspect his lawyer would try to make is something along the lines of "it seemed like it was about to kick off, so it seemed like the best course of action to least escalate the situation". The prosecution on the other hand would argue that it was disproportionate, and there were other courses of action that would have been more appropriate.
Come on, there were some there trying to get a reaction from the police, hence the scores of people carrying video cameras, hoping to get something juicy.
The woman and others, jumped on a minor incident where the black bloke was pushed, and deliberately inflamed it, then screamed police brutality when they got a reaction from the police, what they were looking for.
AB 42 is a sergeant with City Of Westminster Police based at BegraviaSomeone has put up a quite corrupted image suggesting that he is AB 42
http://publish.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/04/427427.html?c=on#c220573