Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Champion Hill: Proposed Ground Redevelopment

Update on the JR in Ben's programme notes. Bit worrying.

It's more than a bit worrying, but it's been the case since at least the DHST AGM in the summer where Ben spoke about this and outlined the threats to us as an ongoing concern then. The fact that you only say 'bit worrying' highlights my concern entirely in that I don't think 99% of fans don't really understand the potential gravity of the situation if the JR doesn't go in our favour AND we can't get a longer lease to play at Champion Hill.

These two things in the article don't tally:

"...we have reached the point where time is now very much against us"

"We will publish the timeline in the coming weeks as well as information on how and when you can help."

If the first statement is true then the second part needs to get a serious shift on. The timeline up to the JR is known. I don't see what we can do to materially affect the JR now beyond telling the world who has brought this case, finding out who is funding it, and then hoping they do their best imitation of our government and pull it.

As I see it:

Best Case Scenarios:
JR applicant pulls the case completely and we can start to make some progress with building a new ground OR Southwark Council win the JR and the scheme starts to make some headway from the start of next year.

Worst Case Scenario:
Southwark Council lose the JR and the planning process has to be re-run with the risk that consent isn't achieved. DHFC left with just months on the lease to play at Champion Hill and have to negotiate with the National League / FA to allow them to continue playing at the ground without security of tenure.

Of course all of those concerns subside a little if the owners of Champion Hill decide that the Club can continue playing there for at least 3 years, preferably 99.
 
A lot of people at the club have been aware of this impending judicial review for some time now. Ben himself mentioned it in his programme notes back in April whilst the CPRE picked up on it around the same time. I for one can’t believe that the club and the trust have been doing nothing for more than six months but it’s frustrating that we have not had some campaign mobilised until now bringing on board the experience of those involved with the previous Save Dulwich Hamlet campaign as well as newer fans with potential skills to combat these sort of vexatious reviews.
 
A lot of people at the club have been aware of this impending judicial review for some time now. Ben himself mentioned it in his programme notes back in April whilst the CPRE picked up on it around the same time. I for one can’t believe that the club and the trust have been doing nothing for more than six months but it’s frustrating that we have not had some campaign mobilised until now bringing on board the experience of those involved with the previous Save Dulwich Hamlet campaign as well as newer fans with potential skills to combat these sort of vexatious reviews.
The CPRE article calls Greendale a public park and Dulwich Hamlet a professional football club. Neither of those are true are they? The club doesn't own the ground, we're in a can't win situation being tied up with a property developer, doesn't mention that though...
 
The CPRE article calls Greendale a public park and Dulwich Hamlet a professional football club. Neither of those are true are they? The club doesn't own the ground, we're in a can't win situation being tied up with a property developer, doesn't mention that though...
How does one define a “public park”? There is open access to the public via the link path that runs from the back of Sainsbury’s to the Green Dale pathway on the far side. As for professional club well we are given that our players are paid. I’m guessing that not a lot of CPRE readers would know, or worry about, the distinction between professional, semiprofessional or amateur footballers or more technically correct contract & non-contract players.
 
It is true that an open space which is currently accessible to the public would be fenced off though isn't it. I don't think many of us would buy 'well it's not technically a park' in other circumstances to be honest.
 
So who are we meant to be aiming the campaign at? Is it to put pressure on the developer to not kick us out again if the JR goes against us?
 
Does anyone know what's going on with the JR? Note in Ben's column v Folkestone that it was scheduled for 6th Dec. Obviously that's been and gone, though. Were we expecting a decision on 6th Dec? Or was that just the start of a process that will ultimately give us a decision?
 
Does anyone know what's going on with the JR? Note in Ben's column v Folkestone that it was scheduled for 6th Dec. Obviously that's been and gone, though. Were we expecting a decision on 6th Dec? Or was that just the start of a process that will ultimately give us a decision?
Not sure what’s happened but think the decision is usually at least couple of months after the hearing.
 
I'm a little bit lost with all the back and forth on the planning thing.

The planning app was granted, the JR was objecting to how the decision was made/run and trying to stop it, is that right? So the redevelopment/new stadium will/should be going ahead?
 
The planning app was granted, the JR was objecting to how the decision was made/run and trying to stop it, is that right? So the redevelopment/new stadium will/should be going ahead?

Yeh, I agree: is this confirmation that the stadium definitely will go ahead now? Does anyone know when they can actually start building it?
 
Back
Top Bottom