Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Celebrity Big Brother 2007

Rutita1 said:
Why don't you tell me what you mean by that, I'm not sure I understand.
..............I certainly don't rememeber Jackiey calling anyone a 'spade'.:confused:

Now where did that fucking point go, I'm sure I saw it here a second ago:confused:
 
jade%20goody.jpg


The 25th most influential person in the world, apparently.
 
Rutita1 said:
Why don't you tell me what you mean by that, I'm not sure I understand.
..............I certainly don't rememeber Jackiey calling anyone a 'spade'.:confused:
wtf is with you you are seeign racism every bloody where time fo the month or wot... muppet...

w'gwan at the haus then?
 
Orangesanlemons said:
It's all a bit confused at the moment, but I'd take the spoiler at face value - I'd say Cleo/Carole up, plus Leo, plus *probably* the person with the most noms after him.

So: if they pick Cleo she'd be more than likely safe, but Carole would be vulnerable against Leo. Think about the respective fees/entertainment value, and apply that to the likely edit Endemol will give each HM. Carole adds little to the show, Leo plenty. In a negative vote Leo could have problems, in a positive he'd probably survive - if I was at Endemol I know what vote I'd announce. They'd like Leo there for a while longer I suspect.

Cleo would cause problems, as they know they can't really edit against her - how could you? She's lovely! I suspect that's why the nominations have been postponed until morning - they need time to figure out who they're going to sacrifice, the second nominee. It looks like Shilpa may be up, which wouldn't suit them either - they really need an expendable at this stage, Carole or Jack. If the group don't pick Carole, Endemol face losing one of their big assets.

So I'm gently backing Carole, but very, very steadily. This lot couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery, as we saw this summer.

Nice analysis. I think I'll stay out of this one.
 
Rutita1 said:
No, I haven't claimed anyone was being racist......what made you think that?:confused:
you geenral time of the month battering of people left right and centre today if they made some vauge comment which you decided was against the grain why pace my text in bold love...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
you geenral time of the month battering of people left right and centre today if they made some vauge comment which you decided was against the grain why pace my text in bold love...

That's your take on things but you are wrong. I have not battered anyone. Like everyone else around here I am allowed to have an opinion. I asked Chaz a question...
 
From Digital Spy: Quick catch up. everyone but Cleo and Carole nominated. After everyone had finished Cleo and Carole got called to the DR together. loads of s/c, but the HM in the lounge had to choose between themselves if carole or cleo should be up. They choose Carole.
..
 
Rutita1 said:
That's your take on things but you are wrong. I have not battered anyone. Like everyone else around here I am allowed to have an opinion. I asked Chaz a question...
yet you attempt to deride me for mine, with your prissy smugness.....you love have an attidue problem.. :rolleyes:
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
yet you attempt to deride me for mine, with your prissy smugness.....you love have an attidue problem.. :rolleyes:

No Garf, I don't have an attitude problem and believe me, I am far from prissy or smug.

You however, seem to be spoiling for a spat, now I wonder why? We both know the answer to that don't we. :)
 
Rutita1 said:
No Garf, I don't have an attitude problem and believe me, I am far from prissy or smug.

You however, seem to be spoiling for a spat, now I wonder why? We both know the answer to that don't we. :)
i don't need to beleive or not to beleive you dearie i have the evidence in front of me, i'm merely stating my opinion, not spoiling for anything, now why would you view that as confrontation, some one stating their opinion, ... i mean it's not like you have done that alot today is it... oh no it's other peoples problem, let's not focuas on the common denominator push all that blame outways and upwards... rigth love... :rolleyes:

please do us all a favour and drop that chip on yer shoulder and get over yerself...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
i don't need to beleive or not to beleive you dearie i have the evidence in front of me, i'm merely stating my opinion, not spoiling for anything, now why would you view that as confrontation, some one stating their opinion, ... i mean it's not like you have done that alot today is it... oh no it's other peoples problem, let's not focuas on the common denominator push all that blame outways and upwards... rigth love... :rolleyes:

please do us all a favour and drop that chip on yer shoulder and get over yerself...

I disagree with people, they disagree with me. Happens on here, people disagree with eachother, happens to all of us. So what.

I don't mind people disagreeing with me but do however, reserve the right to tell them, when they make assumptions of me that are wrong.

Now you are accusing me of having a chip on my shoulder.... *has a look* no, no chips.

Tell you what, I'll get over myself if you get over yourself.

Really Garf, I can't be asked. Not least because I am pretty sure what this is all about.
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
let's not focuas on the common denominator push all that blame outways and upwards... rigth love... :rolleyes:

please do us all a favour and drop that chip on yer shoulder and get over yerself...


Hmm. Let me see. Do I find Rutita one of the people who's generally engaged in personal spats and oppositional badmouthing on the boards. Or would I say Garf and TP deserve the 'could start an argument in an empty room' award more?

Common denominator(s) my arse - rich, very rich. You'll have to excuse my laughing so hard I'm rolling around on the floor smiley...

roflmao.gif
 
Rutita1 said:
I disagree with people, they disagree with me. Happens on here, people disagree with eachother, happens to all of us. So what.

I don't mind people disagreeing with me but do however, reserve the right to tell them, when they make assumptions of me that are wrong.

Now you are accusing me of having a chip on my shoulder.... *has a look* no, no chips.

Tell you what, I'll get over myself if you get over yourself.

Really Garf, I can't be asked. Not least because I am pretty sure what this is all about.

ah hem...

Like everyone else around here I am allowed to have an opinion.

ok ...

deal alright love...

just deal...
 
tarannau said:
Hmm. Let me see. Do I find Rutita one of the people who's generally engaged in personal spats and oppositional badmouthing on the boards. Or would I say Garf and TP deserve the 'could start an argument in an empty room' award more?

Common denominator(s) my arse - rich, very rich. You'll have to excuse my laughing so hard I'm rolling around on the floor smiley...

roflmao.gif
Perfectly put.

If I had a spare jar of hot pepper sauce I would give it to you.

peace
tony999
 
tarannau said:
Hmm. Let me see. Do I find Rutita one of the people who's generally engaged in personal spats and oppositional badmouthing on the boards. Or would I say Garf and TP deserve the 'could start an argument in an empty room' award more?

Common denominator(s) my arse - rich, very rich. You'll have to excuse my laughing so hard I'm rolling around on the floor smiley...

roflmao.gif
lemme see were you invited to poour this driseroy comment on some one merely stating their opinion... no dear you weren't, but then i guess that's you just stating your opinion right ... so it's all cool baby... summit or friend rutita can't seem to get her head round ... it's fine for her to state her opinion but woe betide anyone one else doing the same... not least her insessent comments demanding to know why people are in her eyes insinuating racist comments... which was my orginal point beofre it was subtley derailed by her demanding to know why i was allowed to state and opinion about it and then complaining her opinion was being stiflled, before then going on to infer that i'm racist to with her little dig abotu thinking she knows what this is all about...

sorry but she does this all the time...

it's farking playground well you would saythat consdiering and then no being explicit leaving it hanging for others to fill int he blnaks like there's some big secret she's not going to let drop... and it all leads back to one thing that she's accusing yet another person of being racist...

lovely bit of work... ...

like i said just my opinion...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
lemme see were you invited to poour this driseroy comment on some one merely stating their opinion... no dear you weren't, but then i guess that's you just stating your opinion right ... so it's all cool baby... summit or friend rutita can't seem to get her head round ... it's fine for her to state her opinion but woe betide anyone one else doing the same... not least her insessent comments demanding to know why people are in her eyes insinuating racist comments... which was my orginal point beofre it was subtley derailed by her demanding to know why i was allowed to state and opinion about it and then complaining her opinion was being stiflled, before then going on to infer that i'm racist to with her little dig abotu thinking she knows what this is all about...

sorry but she does this all the time...

it's farking playground well you would saythat consdiering and then no being explicit leaving it hanging for others to fill int he blnaks like there's some big secret she's not going to let drop... and it all leads back to one thing that she's accusing yet another person of being racist...

lovely bit of work... ...

like i said just my opinion...

I have not accused anyone of being racist.

My insinuation about 'why' you are spoiling for a fight is not because I think you are racist, as well you know.

You are of course, are entitled to your opinion, but, as you are not all knowing and all seeing, therefore, like the rest of us meer mortals, may sometimes be wrong.

Now please, do leave it alone.
 
Rutita1 said:
I have not accused anyone of being racist.

My insinuation about 'why' you are spoiling for a fight is not because I think you are racist, as well you know.

You are of course, are entitled to your opinion, but, as you are not all knowing and all seeing, therefore, like the rest of us meer mortals, may sometimes be wrong.
never said i wasn't but don't play dumb with me love you are defo insinuating i'm a racist anyways liek said this ain't the thread for it it's the farking cbb thread for fucks sake ...

no doubt you'll have to come back for on more time as you can never let it drop...

not suprised you can't see the chip that plank in yer eye is in the way...
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
lemme see were you invited to poour this driseroy comment on some one merely stating their opinion... no dear you weren't, but then i guess that's you just stating your opinion right ... so it's all cool baby... summit or friend rutita can't seem to get her head round ... it's fine for her to state her opinion but woe betide anyone one else doing the same... not least her insessent comments demanding to know why people are in her eyes insinuating racist comments... which was my orginal point beofre it was subtley derailed by her demanding to know why i was allowed to state and opinion about it and then complaining her opinion was being stiflled, before then going on to infer that i'm racist to with her little dig abotu thinking she knows what this is all about...

sorry but she does this all the time...

it's farking playground well you would saythat consdiering and then no being explicit leaving it hanging for others to fill int he blnaks like there's some big secret she's not going to let drop... and it all leads back to one thing that she's accusing yet another person of being racist...

lovely bit of work... ...

like i said just my opinion...


If you had any less self-perception and self-knowledge you'd be an inert piece of coal.

You came and started this war of words with Rutita on this largely friendly BB thread, based on an interpretation of her words as implying 'racism.' It was a stretch at the best of times - her posts on this thread certainly didn't didn't deserve this level of vitriol or personal assault. The jaw-dropping hypocrisy of you steaming into this thread alleging that Rutita has an 'attitude problem' and is a 'common denominator' is truly outstanding. I salute you - gawd knows how you'd describe many of yours and TP's posts

And frankly I can't be bothered to read any more of your ranted, near illiterate tosh. Show some courtesy, slow down and use a spellchecker and consider what you're posting more. It won't take too long... and may even stop you posting up such ill-thought out guff once in a while.

Anyway, I'm back to laughing at your hypocrisy and lack of self knowledge. Excuse me whilst I roll around a little more at the richness of your comments.

roflmao.gif
 
Rutita1 said:
I have not accused anyone of being racist.

My insinuation about 'why' you are spoiling for a fight is not because I think you are racist, as well you know.

You are of course, are entitled to your opinion, but, as you are not all knowing and all seeing, therefore, like the rest of us meer mortals, may sometimes be wrong.

Now please, do leave it alone.
nice edit... :p
 
Back
Top Bottom