Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton Ritzy - upcoming films, reviews and opinions

Went to "God's Own Country" - at "The Studio" at BFI. The venue is somewhat downstream of Ritzy screen 5 I would suggest - the Ritzy has a raked floor so you don't get heads at the bottom of the screen. £8.50 seems to be the normal price for BFI Studio (£7.20 members and guests)

The film is pretty amazing for a directorial debut. Not for the queezy. Knee trembling gay sex (not totally explicit) and some obsessive filming of lambs being pulled out of sheep's wombs, a still-born calf and other such farming reality scenes.

More disturbing perhaps was the very cold and uptight family at the centre of the film.

This is an intense film with a gay romantic theme which somehow ends with the possibility of happiness. In the harrowing nature of the story and the twist at the end it shares something with "Moonlight". But "Gods Own Country" is an overtly gay romance in a way that "Moonlight" is not.

Saw this in the wonderful Peckhamplex. Good point about Moonlight. This film was in some ways straightforward love story. Just happened to be two men. My partner liked it a lot. As she saw it as romantic. Which it is. In in Peckhamplex it had crossover appeal from my unscientific look at the audience. Looks like it has done well for a low budget British movie. Been on for several weeks and still a good turnout to see it when we went.

I liked it. The film was made by the good use of the wild country landscape and the two great performances by the two main actors.
 
I'm going to de-sticky this thread as the boycott is still underway.
I was looking for it to comment.

Anyway it's that I was curious to see the Ai Weiwei film on refugees called "Human Flow" which was reviewed in Friday's Standard.

Can't see it listed at the Ritzy - but the Doc House at the Bloomsbury Curzon has it including the discounted off-peak price of £5 like the Ritzy used to do before it got less community minded. HUMAN FLOW | DocHouse
 
Now the boycott has ended I back at Ritzy. So resurrecting this thread. My review of 1917 on the film thread.


saw 1917 today at screen one in the Ritzy cinema ( London).

I have avoided reviews as didn't want to know to much.

It really needs to be seen on a big screen. There is also an IMAX version. I would recommend trying to see it now.

A staggering piece of work.

It is straightforward into the action deceptively simple story making. Goes along at a break neck pace that reminded me of Gibson's Apocalypto. Seamless large scale pieces using extras and special effects.

The post apocalyptic landscapes are quite stunning and disturbing.

It reminded me of tarkovsky "Stalker" at times. The two protagonists go on a journey to the "zone" No Man's Land. Full of traps and surreal encounters in an alien landscape. And "Apocalypse Now". They meet the good and the mad on their journey into the darkness.

What I really liked about the way it was made is that it does not give one a particular message.

I read it as a decent into hell. In that sense it is an anti war film. It also reminded me of the landscapes of hieronymus Bosch via Sci fi. A sci fi novel I read . Set In future where hell is set up in virtual reality where one is uploaded . Its grimly repetitive without escape. This is the reality the two protoganists are thrown into.

Its a quite surreal experience to watch this film.

Definitely a must watch at the cinema.

To add it combines all this with moving personal story of the two main protagonist in the film.
 
We
Now the boycott has ended I back at Ritzy. So resurrecting this thread. My review of 1917 on the film thread.


saw 1917 today at screen one in the Ritzy cinema ( London).

I have avoided reviews as didn't want to know to much.

It really needs to be seen on a big screen. There is also an IMAX version. I would recommend trying to see it now.

A staggering piece of work.

It is straightforward into the action deceptively simple story making. Goes along at a break neck pace that reminded me of Gibson's Apocalypto. Seamless large scale pieces using extras and special effects.

The post apocalyptic landscapes are quite stunning and disturbing.

It reminded me of tarkovsky "Stalker" at times. The two protagonists go on a journey to the "zone" No Man's Land. Full of traps and surreal encounters in an alien landscape. And "Apocalypse Now". They meet the good and the mad on their journey into the darkness.

What I really liked about the way it was made is that it does not give one a particular message.

I read it as a decent into hell. In that sense it is an anti war film. It also reminded me of the landscapes of hieronymus Bosch via Sci fi. A sci fi novel I read . Set In future where hell is set up in virtual reality where one is uploaded . Its grimly repetitive without escape. This is the reality the two protoganists are thrown into.

Its a quite surreal experience to watch this film.

Definitely a must watch at the cinema.

To add it combines all this with moving personal story of the two main protagonist in the film.
Went to the Curzon Victoria to see 1917 because its a small and comfortable, I wanted to watch it in a cinema that amplified the immersive experience I was expecting. Best film I've seen in a long time excellently put together, the sets, the colouring and even the dialogue was reminiscent of the Peter Jackson reconstructed genuine WW1 footage. It's intense and I was gripped start to finish, drawn in, flinching, repulsed, crying, its quite an experience.
 
I saw "Parasite" at Ritzy today. Cinema was packed so this is a popular film. Winning the Oscar of course helps. It was this or Emma. As this was on at right time we saw this. I was a bit concerned it wouldnt be my partners cup of tea. I like Korean film but know they go into dark territory. And can be violent.

Glad to say my partner gave it the thumbs up. Reason being this was a working class family who all stick together and support each other in a society which is divided between rich and poor. This over rode the dark side of the film and the violence. They stick together right to the end which my partner ( and myself) found moving.

I do like films that give the wealthy middle classes a hard time. Middle class get what they deserved in this film.

I havent read the reviews yet. Only know the house is a real house. Its a great part of the film. I saw it in screen one at Ritzy and it deserves a big screen.

This is a film about class. Looked up Bong Joon Ho. On this film he said:

In today's capitalistic society there are ranks and castes that are invisible to the eye. We keep them disguised and out of sight and superficially look down on class hierarchies as a relic of the past, but the reality is that there are class lines that cannot be crossed. I think that this film (Parasite, 2019) depicts the inevitable cracks that appear when two classes brush up against each other in today's increasingly polarized society.
( I saw Snowpiercer last week on internet . Its a sci fi post apocalyptic film of class war on a train. Worth a look and quite a different kind of film. )

A note on Asian culture. People I have known from Korea and China get a bit upset about viewing them as the Asian other with a particular way to tell stories. Both Korea and China have gone through Modernisation project of the right and left. In case of Korea in a divided country. The south was modernised in breakneck speed under authoritarian governements. Korean friend parent were poor peasants. She lives in city like any "Westerner". They feel themselves to be as Western as Europeans. The difference being that their industrial revolution took place in a very short period of time post WW2. They find it condescending to be viewed as not on a par with the rest of the "West". Or seen as "different".

This films popularity is also that it is about class in a capitalist society which a lot of us ( ie me) can identify with.

Im trying not to give plot spoilers here but the quote from director is spot on about what this film is about.

Smell is a theme that runs through the film as a cultural class signifier of class hierarchy for example. Plays an important role in the film.

The little put downs and feeling of inferiority that punctuate this film are spot on from my experience.

There is a great scene in the middle of the film where the poor family are living it up whilst the rich middle class are away. A discussion on wealth.One says the rich mother is nice. As the mother of the poor family says if I was rich I would be nice.

I liked this film from start to finish.

I liked the ending. It was great to see the nauseating middle class garden party disrupted by the working class.

Ten out fuck the rich ten from me.

This is an angry film that portrays the simmering class resentments of capitalist society. Made in Korea but just as relevant here.

Fuck the rich

Also who are the "Parasites"? The poor family who latch themelves onto this wealthy family or the wealthy middle class family? It the wealthy imo.
 
I saw "Parasite" at Ritzy today. Cinema was packed so this is a popular film. Winning the Oscar of course helps. It was this or Emma. As this was on at right time we saw this. I was a bit concerned it wouldnt be my partners cup of tea. I like Korean film but know they go into dark territory. And can be violent.

Glad to say my partner gave it the thumbs up. Reason being this was a working class family who all stick together and support each other in a society which is divided between rich and poor. This over rode the dark side of the film and the violence. They stick together right to the end which my partner ( and myself) found moving.

I do like films that give the wealthy middle classes a hard time. Middle class get what they deserved in this film.

I havent read the reviews yet. Only know the house is a real house. Its a great part of the film. I saw it in screen one at Ritzy and it deserves a big screen.

This is a film about class. Looked up Bong Joon Ho. On this film he said:




( I saw Snowpiercer last week on internet . Its a sci fi post apocalyptic film of class war on a train. Worth a look and quite a different kind of film. )

A note on Asian culture. People I have known from Korea and China get a bit upset about viewing them as the Asian other with a particular way to tell stories. Both Korea and China have gone through Modernisation project of the right and left. In case of Korea in a divided country. The south was modernised in breakneck speed under authoritarian governements. Korean friend parent were poor peasants. She lives in city like any "Westerner". They feel themselves to be as Western as Europeans. The difference being that their industrial revolution took place in a very short period of time post WW2. They find it condescending to be viewed as not on a par with the rest of the "West". Or seen as "different".

This films popularity is also that it is about class in a capitalist society which a lot of us ( ie me) can identify with.

Im trying not to give plot spoilers here but the quote from director is spot on about what this film is about.

Smell is a theme that runs through the film as a cultural class signifier of class hierarchy for example. Plays an important role in the film.

The little put downs and feeling of inferiority that punctuate this film are spot on from my experience.

There is a great scene in the middle of the film where the poor family are living it up whilst the rich middle class are away. A discussion on wealth.One says the rich mother is nice. As the mother of the poor family says if I was rich I would be nice.

I liked this film from start to finish.

I liked the ending. It was great to see the nauseating middle class garden party disrupted by the working class.

Ten out fuck the rich ten from me.

This is an angry film that portrays the simmering class resentments of capitalist society. Made in Korea but just as relevant here.

Fuck the rich

Also who are the "Parasites"? The poor family who latch themelves onto this wealthy family or the wealthy middle class family? It the wealthy imo.
Does it have subtitles?
 
I saw "Parasite" at Ritzy today. Cinema was packed so this is a popular film. Winning the Oscar of course helps. It was this or Emma. As this was on at right time we saw this. I was a bit concerned it wouldnt be my partners cup of tea. I like Korean film but know they go into dark territory. And can be violent.

Glad to say my partner gave it the thumbs up. Reason being this was a working class family who all stick together and support each other in a society which is divided between rich and poor. This over rode the dark side of the film and the violence. They stick together right to the end which my partner ( and myself) found moving.

I do like films that give the wealthy middle classes a hard time. Middle class get what they deserved in this film.

I havent read the reviews yet. Only know the house is a real house. Its a great part of the film. I saw it in screen one at Ritzy and it deserves a big screen.

This is a film about class. Looked up Bong Joon Ho. On this film he said:




( I saw Snowpiercer last week on internet . Its a sci fi post apocalyptic film of class war on a train. Worth a look and quite a different kind of film. )

A note on Asian culture. People I have known from Korea and China get a bit upset about viewing them as the Asian other with a particular way to tell stories. Both Korea and China have gone through Modernisation project of the right and left. In case of Korea in a divided country. The south was modernised in breakneck speed under authoritarian governements. Korean friend parent were poor peasants. She lives in city like any "Westerner". They feel themselves to be as Western as Europeans. The difference being that their industrial revolution took place in a very short period of time post WW2. They find it condescending to be viewed as not on a par with the rest of the "West". Or seen as "different".

This films popularity is also that it is about class in a capitalist society which a lot of us ( ie me) can identify with.

Im trying not to give plot spoilers here but the quote from director is spot on about what this film is about.

Smell is a theme that runs through the film as a cultural class signifier of class hierarchy for example. Plays an important role in the film.

The little put downs and feeling of inferiority that punctuate this film are spot on from my experience.

There is a great scene in the middle of the film where the poor family are living it up whilst the rich middle class are away. A discussion on wealth.One says the rich mother is nice. As the mother of the poor family says if I was rich I would be nice.

I liked this film from start to finish.

I liked the ending. It was great to see the nauseating middle class garden party disrupted by the working class.

Ten out fuck the rich ten from me.

This is an angry film that portrays the simmering class resentments of capitalist society. Made in Korea but just as relevant here.

Fuck the rich

Also who are the "Parasites"? The poor family who latch themelves onto this wealthy family or the wealthy middle class family? It the wealthy imo.
I went to see Parasite at the Peckham Plex this afternoon.
Was pleased I didn't pay Ritzy price, as I didn't really enjoy it.
I'm not saying it isn't a clever film - but I didn't really get the class issue people are referring to.
I haven't been to Korea, but I have been to India, Morocco, Ghana and Nigeria - all of which have serious wealth inequality.

I think Parasite is a Korean Shaun of the Dead - but if there is a sense of humour it doesn't come over to me.
I have an unfortunate brain defect which leads me to compare and contrast films, music or art in terms of something I've already experienced.

I started off thinking Parasite was like The Servant, then it morphed into the Beast in the Cellar. Finally it really resolved into God Told Me To - a film so inappropriate that a 1980s Ritzy staff member recently claimed in the Brixton Review of Books to have cut out the offending celluloid and put it in her closet.

I have to say on this one I agree with Trump but for different reasons. Trump is alleged to have complained that he couldn't follow it because the actors were not speaking in English. For my part I would say that the film has a clever plot but is really cynical a definitely not uplifting or inspiring.

I note there was a certain dwelling on backing up toilets. Maybe people whose favourite character is Mr Creosote might find that comforting.
 
I went to see Parasite at the Peckham Plex this afternoon.
Was pleased I didn't pay Ritzy price, as I didn't really enjoy it.
I'm not saying it isn't a clever film - but I didn't really get the class issue people are referring to.
I haven't been to Korea, but I have been to India, Morocco, Ghana and Nigeria - all of which have serious wealth inequality.

I think Parasite is a Korean Shaun of the Dead - but if there is a sense of humour it doesn't come over to me.
I have an unfortunate brain defect which leads me to compare and contrast films, music or art in terms of something I've already experienced.

I started off thinking Parasite was like The Servant, then it morphed into the Beast in the Cellar. Finally it really resolved into God Told Me To - a film so inappropriate that a 1980s Ritzy staff member recently claimed in the Brixton Review of Books to have cut out the offending celluloid and put it in her closet.

I have to say on this one I agree with Trump but for different reasons. Trump is alleged to have complained that he couldn't follow it because the actors were not speaking in English. For my part I would say that the film has a clever plot but is really cynical a definitely not uplifting or inspiring.

I note there was a certain dwelling on backing up toilets. Maybe people whose favourite character is Mr Creosote might find that comforting.
Struck me as a film more about greed than class.
 
Struck me as a film more about greed than class.
Maybe - the high-living family had a sense of assurance, and their counterparts a desperation of not having a secure future, hence their parasitic inveigling. The danger below and the denouement is why I would class this as a horror film rather than a DH Lawrence style story on class.
 
Well I thought maybe I was putting to much emphasis on class in the film. Googled class and parasite the film and it appears Im not that wide off the mark.

I cant understand how one can watch this film and not see its about class and inequality.
 
It's a bit of a shame that this thread is split off from the main discussion on films at the cinema in the books, film, tv forum. There already was an ongoing discussion on Parasite there. The Ritzy mostly just shows the films every other cinema shows.
 
Reno Your comment on the thread you referred to was illuminating.

I see the comments there are to a degree from film/cinema lovers and aficionados.
I don't really fit into that category.

I do occasionally go to either the Ritzy or the Plex, when II'm curious about a film. In this Parasite case I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.
Last film I saw in the Ritzy and was very impressed by was Get Out.
I also liked or was impressed by Silence and Moonlight at the Plex.
Gods Own Country I think I saw at the BFI.

I'm a bit lazy looking round Urban, so I did post some comments here, as the Ritzy Films thread was in my face so to speak.

Coming back to your analysis of the director of Parasite - this does explain why I didn't like the film. Monster movies are a very personal thing, and if Parasite is toned down, as you say, I can;t see me liking his other offerings either.
 
Reno Your comment on the thread you referred to was illuminating.

I see the comments there are to a degree from film/cinema lovers and aficionados.
I don't really fit into that category.

I do occasionally go to either the Ritzy or the Plex, when II'm curious about a film. In this Parasite case I wanted to see what the fuss was all about.
Last film I saw in the Ritzy and was very impressed by was Get Out.
I also liked or was impressed by Silence and Moonlight at the Plex.
Gods Own Country I think I saw at the BFI.

I'm a bit lazy looking round Urban, so I did post some comments here, as the Ritzy Films thread was in my face so to speak.

Coming back to your analysis of the director of Parasite - this does explain why I didn't like the film. Monster movies are a very personal thing, and if Parasite is toned down, as you say, I can;t see me liking his other offerings either.
What I was referring to, is that the type of comedy which is culturally specific to Korean cinema has been toned down in his later films. Parasite itself is no more low key than his other films. His thriller Mother, my favourite of his, is probably his most low key movie.

I too loved Get Out, but I think it's actually pretty similar to what Bong Joon-ho does. Social satire in the form of a genre film.
 
Since this thread has died - how about a quick gander at the transformation scene from the notorious "sex-change" Parsifal, on view at the Ritzy for a whole day showing on a Sunday in 1982. Nothing like it has been seen since!
 
Seems like there IS a discount on Mondays:
It’s #HappyMonday with tickets only £7.90 (£4.90 for members) all day today!

I'm somewhat confused by The Woman King -which is the latest cult Hollywood epic released presumably for Black History Month.
1665409923483.png
The plot seems quite similar to Werner Herzog's Cobra Verde - which I recall seeing in the Ritzy when it came out around 1987.
1665409962804.png
The again, Herzog adapted his screenplay from the novel "The Viceroy oif Ouidah" by Bruce Chetwin
1665410087357.png

So what is the truth here - is this successive fictionalisation of true events where the latest iteration is unwilling to acknowledge intellectual property rights?
I reckon the creators of the new movie are lucky that they are dealing with a dead author and Werner Hertzog here.
Werner is apparently more interested in creating his own myth of benign sage to get into court.

There is an interesting precedent:
Writer and Pulitzer Prize winner Alex Haley is best known for his book Roots. This book was later turned into a famous miniseries. Haley was accused of taking parts of The African by Harold Courlander and using them in Roots. He was sued in 1978 and eventually admitted that he had plagiarized the information.
 
Weird bit of snitching here


I saw Women in Love - a well-regarded Ken Russell X film when I was 15 (a year too young!)
Not sure it did me any harm - or any good. The bits I remember (apart from the notorious nude wrestling scene with Oliver Reed) were Glenda Jackson dancing in front of a herd of cows - which furiously charged her, and also someone embarrassingly dropping a trowel into the grave at the funeral scene.

As regards under age drinking - it was a badge of honour at my school to drink in pubs at 16. According to Quota - the know-it-all site for nerds - the actual legal age for drinking in England and Wales is 5! (Depends on an adult being present, food being eaten etc).
 
I went to see "Chevalier" yesterday [at the Plex btw - though it's at the Ritzy too]
Mark Kermode's film of the week Chevalier review – entertainingly soapy portrait of a Black 18th-century maestro
I was a bit bemused. First of all the Pearl & Dean adverts were loud as a pneumatic drill.
The film sound was normal volume but somehow lacked clarity at times (I'm a bit deaf - maybe should have gone to the subtitled performance on Wednesday)
I think Mark Kermode's review captures the essence of the film.
I kept thinking is this true? The film does have quite prestigious antecedents - both Ken Russell and Tony Palmer have produced many films about composers which heighten reality to make a point - e.g. the late and much lamented Glenda Jackson making Richard Chamberlain's Tchaikovsky ill by her sexual demands in a railway carriage in "The Music Lovers".

The comparable in "Chevalier" was the dominating presence of Marie Antoinette, who seems to be the dominatrix of France at the time (in the film). The film seems to have a large investment in Marie Antoinette. No longer is it "Madam the people are hungry - they have no bread" "Let them eat cake". Now as regards Chevalier its "I made you - and I will break you!".
She awards Jospeph Bologne the honorific title Chevalier de St-Georges when he beats a racist aristocrat at a fencing match, only to ban him when her favourite composer Gluck and the Paris Opera refuse to perform his work - in a way expressed in racist terms. Towards the end the Chevalier is presented as a harbinger of the French Revolution - although in the credits at the end it is stated that slavery is reintroduced, and the Chevalier's works banned by Napoleon.

How true is all this - I think we should be told!

I have to say, seeing this film in Peckham, where there was an outbreak of applause at the end from the quite small 6.15 pm audience, and walking down Peckham Rye Lane to have a £2.14 Monday Club pint at the Kentish Drover makes me think I ought to be thinking of moving to Peckham. People are multicultural and human there.
 
I just checked the Plex and the Ritzy for "Golda". Wondered whether this was a fortuitous time to launch the film?
(came out in the USA in August apparently)
I was wondering about the clash over the prosthetic nose (or not) - and also the cross-ethnic casting controversy Helen Mirren addresses Golda casting controversy
Anyway Golda is available in multiple Cineworld venues - but not Brixton as yet. It's not down at the Peckham Plex yet either.

More tragically the Peckham Plex has upped its charge to £5.99 - though even so one wonders "How do they do it?"
 
Excuse my boundary issues here - this film is on on Monday evening on London Live TV 10.00 pm - 12.40 pm. Freeview channel 8.

10:00 pm—12:40 amThe Animals Film​

Documentary about the abuse of animals in factory farming, sport and research. Made over a period of two years in Britain and the U.S.
1698582531122.png
This was shown of day 3 of Channel 4 in 1982 - but the last 7 minutes were cut as not suitable for TV screening.
It was repeated in Channel 4's Banned season in 1991.

Nor sure if this London Live showing is cut or uncut. The only way to find out seems to be to buy the DVD ( £15.89)
So possibly one to watch on TV. The contrast in the scenes with battery hens in cages and "free range" is graphic. Apparently the original release date of the film had to be put back as one of the farmers involved sued to have his comments removed.
 
What happens if you're a black drag queen stalked by a white psycho and beaten up in Boots, only to find yourself unrecognised next to your assailant in a gay sauna in a compromising situation?
Now you can find out - I guess the deal is £5.99 at the Peckham Plex or £15.99 at the Brixton Ritzy
 
Back
Top Bottom