Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton news, rumours and general chat - July 2017

Status
Not open for further replies.
From the petition two posts up:

"These buildings - complete with huge floor to ceiling - what some might describe as Pedo friendly windows - were allowed to go up [...]"

Surely if the new buildings have floor to ceiling windows, it's the people who live in the older houses who are best placed to do the paedo-ing.
If the photo in the petition is of the building they are complaining about then I would like to point out that it is neither concrete nor has floor to ceiling windows.
 
According to the FT Brixton is bucking the trend when it comes to house prices which are still rising. :( To illustrate their point they mention a house not far from me which is on the market for 1.5 million. :eek:

Subscribe to read

What they don't say is that it's been extended by building upwards and the owners are in fact property developers who are pretending to live there.
 
According to the FT Brixton is bucking the trend when it comes to house prices which are still rising. :( To illustrate their point they mention a house not far from me which is on the market for 1.5 million. :eek:

Subscribe to read

What they don't say is that it's been extended by building upwards and the owners are in fact property developers who are pretending to live there.
To obviate the need to self-identify and get a quota - do you mean they say Brixton is still going up, whilst elsewhere is going down?

My gut reaction is that most of London is going down - just looking at Wednesdays in the Standard.

Maybe what we need is a Standard feature on Brixton - then we would get a benchmark for a range of choices in Brixton - without even having to check the estate agents.
 
According to the FT Brixton is bucking the trend when it comes to house prices which are still rising. :( To illustrate their point they mention a house not far from me which is on the market for 1.5 million. :eek:

Subscribe to read

What they don't say is that it's been extended by building upwards and the owners are in fact property developers who are pretending to live there.
Can you copy that in as I'm not going to give Murdoch money to read it!
 
To obviate the need to self-identify and get a quota - do you mean they say Brixton is still going up, whilst elsewhere is going down?

My gut reaction is that most of London is going down - just looking at Wednesdays in the Standard.

Maybe what we need is a Standard feature on Brixton - then we would get a benchmark for a range of choices in Brixton - without even having to check the estate agents.
Yes, Brixton is still going up due to an influx of young professionals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CH1
It's all subjective. Where Murdoch is a 10 and Yoghourt Knitting Monthly is a 1, I'd say:
DMGT (Mail etc) is an 8,
Northern & Shell (Express) a 7 along with Telegraph
Grauniad 6
Morning star a 3 as it's mostly harmless
I'd probably give FT a 5 - It is relatively objective unless talking about Nikkei and if you can accept that it has a financial focus
 
Last edited:
Some pics from last night

brixton-thurs-reggae-jazz-004.jpg



brixton-thurs-reggae-jazz-015.jpg


brixton-thurs-reggae-jazz-006.jpg


In photos: Brixton jazz and reggae at the Prince of Wales and Club 414 on a Thursday night
 
As Jason says in the article this is apparently a turf war between regeneration consultants.

I have been amazed that despite a rolling programme of public consultations the residents of this estate have been somewhat quiescent.

Maybe there are fewer than normal right to buy cases - who are the ones destined to lose most from the normal compulsory purchase terms.
 

The bigger picture is that this is an example of how a democratically elected body is hamstrung by having to abide by an enforced so called "free market". The power is in hand of business not elected bodies. I'm no Brexiter but this is good example of EU shortcomings.

Secondly Fenwick estate may agree to redevelopment of there estate but under EU competative tendering they have no say in who gets the contract. A democratic deficit imo.
 
Last edited:
I wonder on what grounds the tendering process was contested? Lambeth advertised it in EU. As is required. So what happened?

1.6 Although Mace Limited was not the lowest priced tender, it received the highest score through a 30% price / 70% quality assessment. It was therefore recommended that approval was given to approve the appointment of Mace Limited as the development management team as it had received the highest score based on 30% price / 70% quality assessment. Mace Limited was informed that it had been selected provisionally as the development team manager on 27/04/17. The decision to approve the appointment of Mace Limited was made on 08/05/2017.

Second placed bidder querying the quality scores?
 
1.6 Although Mace Limited was not the lowest priced tender, it received the highest score through a 30% price / 70% quality assessment. It was therefore recommended that approval was given to approve the appointment of Mace Limited as the development management team as it had received the highest score based on 30% price / 70% quality assessment. Mace Limited was informed that it had been selected provisionally as the development team manager on 27/04/17. The decision to approve the appointment of Mace Limited was made on 08/05/2017.

Second placed bidder querying the quality scores?
Actually this shows the pathetic nature of Lambeth Council's relations with lawyers and the courts.

Lambeth Council happily evicted local ex-short life people with maximum legal and police paramilitary support, but when it comes to enforcement action where here is planning infringement, beds in sheds or as in this case when a rich contractor "tries it on" Lambeth Council's legal department back right off.
If the council's procurement process was robust in the first place they should have stuck by their guns and sat back waiting for m'learned friends to award compensation for vexatious litigation.

The fact that the procurement has been pulled suggests Councillor McGlone at least has less than 100% confidence in his officers.

Actually I have less than 100% confidence in Lambeth Council as a regenerator.
Apart from creating an environmental blitz worse than anything since World War II there seem now to be some major cost overruns - with no indication of how these will be funded:
1. Somerleyton Road
2. Your new town hall
3. Fenwick

Any more coming up?
 
I wonder on what grounds the tendering process was contested? Lambeth advertised it in EU. As is required. So what happened?
I reckon there could be all sorts of possibilities for challenge - including disputing the "quality" assessments that GarveyLives draws attention to.

I once took part in a very minor tendering process for an architect job in the £1 million bracket involving streetscape improvements. A matrix was prepared by the officers of about 25 questions for applicant contractor, which were to be discussed in their interviews, so the panel could comment and "mark".

Fenwick Estate would have been much much more complicated - and open to interpretation. Presumably if there was a large potential reward involved the applicants - if they spent a lot of time and money preparing their bid might chance their arm at litigation.

I wonder do Lambeth tendering documents contain the famous line from newspaper competitions:

"The judge's decision shall be final"
 
Article in the FT property section today about house prices / gentrification / attractions of Brixton
Is this City Am a rerun of your FT thingee?
Where to buy and who is buying right now in Brixton

This City AM article is as sterotypical of vibrant Brixton as one could get - with an added special attraction of a facing ad for "The Edge" - the new tri-tower Taylor Wimpey lifestyle zone - including north-facing flats for trainspotters.

The information seems largely culled from Clapham estate agents.

"In many ways, Brixton is the capital of south London
" the headline in the internet version of the article gushes, “It’s gone from being Clapham North’s poorer relation to overtaking demand levels... The buyers profile tends to be cash rich parents buying for their children.” says the manager of KFH in Clapham.
Meanwhile the hard copy version (photo below) says "Buzz and burgers draw buyers to Brixton"

Whilst editor is puking I give this journalist the July Urban75 award for alliteration.
Buzz and burgers-s.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom