Brixton news, rumour and general chat - July 2015
- Thread starter David Clapson
- Start date
- Status
Crispy
The following psytrance is baṉned: All
One goes past my house, and they use a pedestrian path to cut through the estate
editor
hiraethified
I wrote a short review of Parissi:
I quite liked it, but it's not going to be my new coffee/work fave - so the search goes on (RIP Kaff).
Parissi – a small and laid back cafe/bar at 76 Atlantic Rd, Brixton
I quite liked it, but it's not going to be my new coffee/work fave - so the search goes on (RIP Kaff).
Parissi – a small and laid back cafe/bar at 76 Atlantic Rd, Brixton
BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
i fish a lake in se25, very beautiful.One goes past my house, and they use a pedestrian path to cut through the estate
it goes like this:
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
lovely peace and quiet with only sound of bird song, the sounds of ball hitting cricket bat from the adjacent cricket field, and OAP's occcasional laughter from the bowling green
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Lucy Fur
Well-Known Member
Bloody OAP's and their bursts of occasional laughter. Ruin it for everyone
T & P
|-o-| (-o-) |-o-|
May I suggest, after the third ocurrence, a well-aimed rock or perhaps the placing of a thick log on the path? I reckon that would get rid of the problem.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
BigMoaner
What A Load of Old Bollocks
all done on the internet now mate.Not to mention the old maids cycling to communion. Or are they on mini-scooters these days
leanderman
Street Party: July 2
The code is guidance to privacy law, which binds us all.
I can't imagine the subjects caring in this instance.
editor
hiraethified
There was nothing illegal about the photo I took. NOTHING. I can understand that this new-found interest in general photography law may appear as a handy and novel opportunity for the usual suspects to attack me, but it is off topic for a thread about Brixton. Please take all further discussion to the photography forum where there is already a busy thread on the topic.
Mr Retro
Beware hedgehogs
There may be nothing illegal but that's not what is being questioned. I have no interest in its legality or otherwise.
I want to know what is the point in putting the photo on the public Brixton board? If you were making a valid point I'd have no issue. However given you choose not to answer why you posted it I assume you were just posting this playing people you don't know, and who I doubt knew they were going to end up on a public board, for lols.
This is nothing to do with attacking you or a discussion about photography which you are now using to hide behind and not answer questions.
boohoo
No.
I name that place in one (and a lovely place it is too).
editor
hiraethified
I suggest you go to the photography forum and raise your new found pressing issues with the legality, validity and purpose of reportage/street photography there.
Mr Retro
Beware hedgehogs
I don't care about the legality or otherwise. I haven't a new found interest in photography.
I have always had an interest in privacy however, so I'll try again: what point are you trying to make posting people asleep in a Brixton pub in the public Brixton forum? In this particular instance what is the purpose? If there is a point I'll happily acknowledge it.
Or were you just playing it for lulz? That's ok too, but I think you should admit it if that's was its only purpose.
editor
hiraethified
I imagine that I'm driven by the same creative urge to document the things I see around me as these award winning street photographers. Please look at their work.
http://www.maciejdakowicz.com/cardiff-after-dark/cardiff-after-dark-photos/
http://we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2009/09/parrworld-the-collection-of-ma-1.php
If you don't understand the medium, or the purpose of such photography, then I suggest you ask in the photography forum because I'm getting bored repeating myself here.
sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
Seriously?. It was an interesting photo of Brixton life.
Mr Retro
Beware hedgehogs
You think? Fair enough
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
you do know pub is short for publick house? that all publick houses covered by cctv? i don't see what your problem is with this, i really don't. it's not like people have a realistick expectation of privacy in a publick house
SpamMisery
Pretty comfortable here right under your skin
I would be annoyed if some random bloke took my photo in pub then posted it online with a slightly sneery comment about 'vibrancy'. I certainly wouldn't have given consent if asked. I think it's more a moral question than a legal one.
editor
hiraethified
My comment - that Spam Misery got so wrong (as he so often does in his quest to score cheap personal points) - pertained to the lack of vibrancy in the bar.
It's supposed to be a new, funky and happening cocktail bar with great DJs - and the punters are falling asleep!
Gramsci
Well-Known Member
And that is how I read your comment.
Jangleballix
Better living through chemistry.
Had a very good large hot portion of chips from there recently. I'll be back.Tried this new chip shop yesterday. Chips were nice, if a tad cold. Fish was quite tasty. My partner was mightily pissed off that they didn't sell chicken. He settled for the only chicken related item on the menu, a chicken & mushroom pie. However the pie tasted more of cheese than chicken. As my partner can't stand cheese, it went uneaten.
Partner wasn't impressed. But I was ok with it. Won't be going there too often. It's quite expensive. Just over £15 for fish, pie and two portions of chips.
Mr Retro
Beware hedgehogs
It's exactly how I read it and how I think too.
Buy we're all entitled to an opinion.
Mr Retro
Beware hedgehogs
I'll ignore the condescending toneyou do know pub is short for publick house? that all publick houses covered by cctv? i don't see what your problem is with this, i really don't. it's not like people have a realistick expectation of privacy in a publick house
All public houses are not covered by cctv.
People have a realistic expectation of not being photographed pissed without their knowledge and the photo put on a public forum, don't you think? It's my realistic expectation at least.
editor
hiraethified
Do you feel equally angry at the millions of similar images that have been taken by photographers and shared online for years on end, or is just my particular image that has compelled you to suddenly speak out on this topic with such passion?
Strange thing is that despite me posting up the same links twice - and personally imploring you to look at their work - you've still to comment or criticise the work of Martin Parr and Maciej Dakowicz, both of whom make a living taking and publishing photographs on a very similar topic. Why is that exactly?
- Status
Similar threads
