editor
hiraethified
They told me that they'd sold shitloads of those shirts since I posted up that feature!I saw those two at the camberwell fair thing in Burgess Park yesterday, best t shirts I've seen for ages .
They told me that they'd sold shitloads of those shirts since I posted up that feature!I saw those two at the camberwell fair thing in Burgess Park yesterday, best t shirts I've seen for ages .
They told me that they'd sold shitloads of those shirts since I posted up that feature!
My dad (Irish), remembers those signs, he has one of them, me another, my brother (still lives in Dublin) is down for one and my friend Yvonne (Black British/Jamaican) asked for one as well.
If it's a real one from the period that he should consider photographing it and sharing it because there's only one documented sign online - and there's some doubts about its authenticity too (not that I'm doubting that these signs existed).My dad (Irish), remembers those signs, he has one of them, me another, my brother (still lives in Dublin) is down for one and my friend Yvonne (Black British/Jamaican) asked for one as well.
As far as I can see it merely refers to permitted hours and the need for a "fat trap" to protect the drains.That link isn't working. What was this agreement?
The planning application that NR put in was against planning guidelines- planning officer said so at the meeting-
I would call it a diatribe. But surely the tracksuit bottoms bit is just aimed at the overweight? If you are running a hedonistic night "space" surely you wouldn't want overweight slobs marring the carefully planned atmosphere?There are often very good articles in Vice, including on the gentrification theme but this one is pretty bad, a full-on judgemental hate-fest. Maybe the author spends too much time reading u75. I actually agree that the dress code is distasteful but as ever the attack is then focused on a fictionally homogeneous group of people - customers and people who work there - rather than the people who run the thing and make decisions about door policy.
And I don't really understand how the Fridge Bar having a "no tracksuits" policy was ok but this one is not. As far as I can see, we can suspect the same intention in either case.
A 'No Tracksuits' Dress Code Is Social Engineering At Its Worst | VICE | United Kingdom
I would call it a diatribe. But surely the tracksuit bottoms bit is just aimed at the overweight? If you are running a hedonistic night "space" surely you wouldn't want overweight slobs marring the carefully planned atmosphere?
People with tracksuit bottoms are always welcome at the Beehive - since they are likely to be very thirsty.
I am trying convince myself this post is a form of satire...
Oh, I see. I'm on a forced ignore thing that means I don't see half the threads in the Brixton forum.^ there'a a whole thread for that article. ..
Brixton Beach Boulevard introduces No Tracksuit dress code
In what way?
The NR planning application did not follow guidelines on the proportions of retail and bars/ restaurants on one site. The application was asking for more permission for more A3 uses (bars etc) than it should to follow planning guidelines.
One Cllr said he was not happy with this but would still vote for the application.
It was valid planning reason to knock the application back.
Planning officer did say something about this being due to allowing present business ability to come back. But I didn’t really understand this. Nor did the Cllrs on the committee question the planning officer or NR further on this. Which they should have done. As its a material planning issue.
Local Plan policy dictated that no more than two in five consecutive ground floor units in the primary shopping area should be in food and drink use at one time. However, the existing food and drink related uses fronting Brixton Station Road were proposed to be retained in terms of their use and would therefore result in more than two in five consecutive units for food and drink use. Officers considered that the scheme complied with Policy PN3 on the basis that the proposals sought to facilitate the return of the existing tenants and that there would be no net increase in the number of food and drink units on Brixton Station Road.
In February 2016, staff members at Vice UK called for unionisation with an officially recognised trade union by the National Union of Journalists. Staff members said this was following the steps of Vice US (which unionised with the Writers Guild of America, East[49]), in order to allow the staff to "share in the success of the company", to strengthen job security by Vice providing better contracts, to address "pay issues ... so everyone gets a fair deal, including freelancers" and enhance career progression opportunities.[50]
This proposition was rejected by Vice UK; the company refused to recognise the National Union of Journalists but instead said that they were free to set up an internal staff council. Vice chief executive, Matt Elek, claimed the NUJ had displayed "a concerning lack of transparency from them about who they are purporting to represent here [and had] not been able to provide us with any numbers to demonstrate the degree of support they have in this office", adding that: "The NUJ are used to working with old print media businesses and structures – they are not used to innovative, digital workplaces like this where the culture has always been to encourage flexibility and allow people work across different departments."[51]
I would call it a diatribe. But surely the tracksuit bottoms bit is just aimed at the overweight? If you are running a hedonistic night "space" surely you wouldn't want overweight slobs marring the carefully planned atmosphere?
People with tracksuit bottoms are always welcome at the Beehive - since they are likely to be very thirsty.
I wish Vice would fuck off with their attempts to brand Brixton
View attachment 91403
Dodgy fucking Disney company too:
WHUFC. Haven't been for ages because I fucking hate sitting during a match. It feels totally wrong.
Herne Hill, May 2015
Vice/Vice Media and all the other oh-so-edgy Vicey things are part owned by Walt Disney Co. who have a $400m investment. Totally punk/well Mexico, etc.I thought this was like a sister website of Vice - confused???
Just a bunch of hipsters together really - I suppose Vice is the younger generation as opposed to your Nathan Barley old style..ya check me like!
Vice/Vice Media and all the other oh-so-edgy Vicey things are part owned by Walt Disney Co. who have a $400m investment. Totally punk/well Mexico, etc.
Disney Invests $200 Million in Vice Media