Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Brixton Clifton Mansions former squats - background, 2011 evictions and latest news

Yes. I heard that. Property returns about 5-6% in London without taking into account the capital growth so I guess it is good for their pension plans in the current climate. Big institutions could affect availability and inflate prices because they will just suck up properties and hold them for ages.

Exactly. Buy and hold. Immune to the whims of the property cycle. And further boosting prices by limiting the amount of purchasable stock.
 
Exactly. Buy and hold. Immune to the whims of the property cycle. And further boosting prices by limiting the amount of purchasable stock.

At least with small scale buy-to-letters it usually gets cashed in at some point or has to be sold upon inheritance so it gets recycled. Once it is owned by an institution it sits there until they have a financial crisis like the Church did in the 80s and start flogging everything off.
 
When you say 'fend off' are you perhaps imagining a hostile takeover bid? If someone owns a company and someone else offers to buy their portfolio or company it is not hostile - it is a straightforward purchase. Nothing to fend off- just a "yes, that'll do nicely" or no. Institutions are likely to be interested in buying up operating portfolios rather than lots of individual properties. They might make an offer. I can't see how they could make a hostile one.

You did say Lexadon may be a "target to be bought out by a financial organisation" in post 656. I read that as larger financial organisation making hostile bid on a smaller property company.
 
You did say Lexadon may be a "target to be bought out by a financial organisation" in post 656. I read that as larger financial organisation making hostile bid on a smaller property company.

I don't think you can launch a hostile take-over if there are only 2 shareholders...assuming they have equal number of shares of course.
 
You did say Lexadon may be a "target to be bought out by a financial organisation" in post 656. I read that as larger financial organisation making hostile bid on a smaller property company.

I can see how you got there but both the words "target" and "buy out" are neutral in business context. A target is simply a result that a business wants to achieve or, more specifically, a business an organisation wants to buy. They can be classified by addition of an adjective (hostile or friendly, for instance). Buying someone out literally just means buying their their shares or interest. If a person were generally suspicious of most things corporate then I can see why they might automatically read hostility into it but most business goes on between willing partners. In Lexadon's case, for example, the only way they could really target the private company is by offering lots of cash, and keep offering more until the small number of shareholders were willing to sell.
 
So Jerry 'Give Nothing Back' Knight is looking to extend Clifton mansions and bolt on a roof terrace and three more flats with 'private roof terraces.'

View attachment 240157

He's obviously won the Battle of Sonar Mews, so there's no looking back, so to speak.
Where does he get those naff metal mansards from? They look like something that might be on offer in an army surplus sale somewhere in Wisconsin.
If I was Ian Nairn and I saw that I would drink 5 pints of Guinness in the Albert and write a nasty article for The Architectural Review.
 
Back
Top Bottom