I think its crueler because mink is a luxury product and most of the mink is wasted, unlike a chicken where the majority of the chicken goes into the food pipeline.
I could go vegan I just can't be arsed frankly the moral problem doesnt bother me .
Indeed. My question to him was; why, if he's happy to kill them for meat, is he unhappy about killing them for fur? Athos has chucked him a lifebelt though!
I think its crueler because mink is a luxury product and most of the mink is wasted, unlike a chicken where the majority of the chicken goes into the food pipeline.
I could go vegan I just can't be arsed frankly the moral problem doesnt bother me .
So that comes back to the question earlier on the thread - If the mink meat was used to make sausages, would it be less cruel/as cruel as leather and beef?
So that comes back to the question earlier on the thread - If the mink meat was used to make sausages, would it be less cruel/as cruel as leather and beef?
cruelty is in how the animal lives and dies - so keeping an animal in a cage, or having a prolonged and ineffective method of killing is cruel whether you use the fur, 10% of the meat, 95% of the meat, or just the toenails - if an animal is kept in much more humane conditions living a 'good life' (however you might want to define that..), and, for example, killed by some very quick process of which the animal is unaware, or unware up until the last moment, then its not cruel - regardless of whether you use the fur, or meat, or toenails.
its certainly unedifying to see an animal stripped of its skin and nothing done with the meat, but that by itself doesn't make the thing cruel - its how the thing lived and died, not what happened to it afterwards that determine cruelty.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.