Possibly both.Do you think AI is going to cause a technology revolution or cause economic destruction?
Possibly both.Do you think AI is going to cause a technology revolution or cause economic destruction?
You’re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of the sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’t, not without your help. But you’re not helping. Why is that?Do you think AI is going to cause a technology revolution or cause economic destruction?
Probably because I'd be a robot and wouldn't understand.You’re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of the sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’t, not without your help. But you’re not helping. Why is that?
Never minding cloning slebs, a stranger could clone your family members to scam your mum or dad.
Do you think AI is going to cause a technology revolution or cause economic destruction?
A key character in the spectacle has been OpenAI chief scientist and board member Ilya Sutskever — who, according to The Atlantic, likes to burn effigies and lead ritualistic chants at the company — and appears to have been one of the main drivers behind Altman's ousting.
[...]
"Feel the AGI! Feel the AGI!" employees reportedly chanted, per The Atlantic, a refrain that was led by Sutskever himself.
The chief scientist even commissioned a wooden effigy to represent an "unaligned" AI that works against the interest of humanity, only to set it on fire.
There was nothing in Drew Ortiz's author biography at Sports Illustrated to suggest that he was anything other than human [... but ...] his profile photo on Sports Illustrated is for sale on a website that sells AI-generated headshots, where he's described as "neutral white young-adult male with short brown hair and blue eyes."
[...]
Making the whole thing even more dubious, these AI-generated personas are periodically scrubbed from existence in favor of new ones. [...] Each time an author was switched out, the posts they supposedly penned would be reattributed to the new persona, with no editor's note explaining the change in byline.
[...]
Though Sports Illustrated's AI-generated authors and their articles disappeared after we asked about them, similar operations appear to be alive and well elsewhere in [their owner] The Arena Group's portfolio.
File on 4 had a programme with rather alarming examples of scammers impersonating loved ones using audio software and blackmailing children using deepfakes:
OK, this took less time than I thought. Check this out.very true
im sure to be wrong
but to repeat my point, the genius of dance music is nailing uplifting basics hard, a much harder trick then people realise
being abstract is actually easier, easier still is being abstract and moody
i expect AI to nail abstract moody first - sweet spot electronic dance musis last
Let’s get it to Xmas number 1!!OK, this took less time than I thought. Check this out.
I didn't write the lyrics. Just used this prompt "A song about a guy called Ska who doesn't believe AI can make dance music".
It created the lyrics, song and video in under 2 minutes
View attachment 404261
I'm not sure that's been tested/provenJust as long as neither you nor anybody else on this thread is feeding it any personal data for your articles. Because that would be against European and UK data laws
I'm not sure that's been tested/proven
How is it differently from, say, using Google Docs and adding personal details to your document?
In both cases, you are transmitting personal data to a third party.
My understanding is this, which is based on conversations with our IT and data security head at work, whose job it is to care about these things. He knows what he’s talking about, but that doesn’t mean I haven’t picked up the wrong of the stick, of course.I'm not sure that's been tested/proven
How is it differently from, say, using Google Docs and adding personal details to your document?
In both cases, you are transmitting personal data to a third party.
How does it help you? Interested in what it may be used for by normal folk like usWelcome to Urban janinej
I think AI potentially will probably significantly change work.
ChatGPT helps me, could it do it without me? Perhaps, but I can do more with it.
You can choose whether to allow or disallow training on your chats.That data is being used to train the next iteration of ChatGPT, which is not a use the originators of the data signed up to.
Fair enough, but that’s hardly the meat of what I’m saying. It’s foam at best.You can choose whether to allow or disallow training on your chats.