i have no idea which bits are incorrect, and i have to admit that i was drawn towards the book after listening to the exchange between Wengrow and Bastani (above). Prior to reading this work my main understandings came via Gordon Childe! students of course are rarely aware of the main debates at uni level until they begin properly engaging in 'the process', which is why i believe that the value of the book lays in its ability to stimulate discussion. Insights and interpretations are often just points of view no?