It won't be e-ink. Jobs is rumoured to hate it and it precludes a snazzy UI because of the slow refresh rate.True
But I'm still not convinced that it will be low power eInk, or that it needs to be.
Daily charging is enough. Irritating, but enough, if you get all the goodies that eInk can't do... video, browsing, fast & nice looking UI.
It won't be e-ink. Jobs is rumoured to hate it and it precludes a snazzy UI because of the slow refresh rate.
This is going to cost a bomb. Way over £200 (the point at which i tune out e-readers), probably £400+
As an e-reader that's ridiculous.
But that it's a tablet PC, not an e-reader. Just as the iphone is a phone not an ereader, netbooks are a subset of laptop and not ereader and my desktop is a computer not an ereader. All of them can run reader software but none of them are e-readers.
I doubt they'll market it as an e-reader, because if they did people will look at it and think "what a waste of money". If it doesn't have e-ink then it'll have to be marketed as a portable movie/internet device, something that builds on the itunes store content.
Yup. It'll make a crap reader. I will still be able to enjoy my PRS505 knowing it is superior.But you can't make a good enough OLED screen to read for protracted periods of time. This is the issue with that theory. Who knows. It'll be way beyond anything I'm willing to pay anyway. Happy with my 3GS and my eBook reader!
It won't be an ereader. It won't be a MacBook in tablet form either (unfortunately). You don't spend that long making a tablet if all it is is the same as other people's tablets, which have flopped. I'm not actually sure at all what sort of OS it *will* be running - full os x doesn't seem very likely with that size screen and lack of keyboard, it would make the ui peculiar, but then they might have found a way round that. iPhone OS is limited for a higher power machine and also, the apps just don't exist for new screen sizes, and they want apps to launch with. It puzzles me a lot.
I will provide salt and pepper.If it's just a big media player with a browser I'll eat my mouse. No way.
If it's just a big media player with a browser I'll eat my mouse. No way.
If it's just a big media player with a browser I'll eat my mouse. No way.
Can they not just double the res and match the aspect ratio of the iPhone to ensure backwards app compatibility?
One could say the iPhone is "just" a media player with a phone and browser. But there were plenty of phones around like that.
It's got to be cheaper than £600, I reckon. At that price it's barely going to impact on the netbook market, and there's a potentially massive market for a low cost, portable device.
I'd say £450 max, perhaps sweetened with network deals.
I'm not sure it has to be, the iPhone is pricier than most smartphone and it still shook up the market selling tons...
This was my (very crudely) envisinged idea of what the Amazon Kindle should be more like if its to take any significant foothold. It needs full colour graphics, and it should be more of a media tablet - not just an eBook reader:
Yeah, but you can't do that with e-ink. And without e-ink, it's not gonna be much of a reader.
it's vapourware