Anelka's quenelle

[editor]

What's up with you?

Just wondering why you should explode with intolerant rage just because I dared express a personal viewpoint that you didn't like.

 

[phildwyer]

LOL. And your actual proof of this invisible God's supposed existence is..... a big fat ZERO, so cut out the unpleasant abuse if you don't mind. Besides, your non existent God wouldn't like it either (depending on which version you're electing to believe in, of course).

God is not like the Loch Ness Monster or the Yeti.

He is not the kind of Being who either does or does not exist.

 

[Edie]

What does your God say you should do?

Right, I've spoken to God. He says your a bit of a dick and to kick your arse on the internet. HTH.

 

[editor]

God is not like the Loch Ness Monster or the Yeti.

He is not the kind of Being who either does or does not exist.

Whatever floats your fantasy boat, phil...

 

[phildwyer]

Whatever floats your fantasy boat, phil...

God is what makes existence possible.

 

[editor]

Right, I've spoken to God. He says your a bit of a dick and to kick your arse on the internet. HTH.

That sounds about right for what some people say God wants. According to them, he seems to be always telling people to go around threatening, murdering and maiming others for some vague abstract reason or another.

 

[editor]

God is what makes existence possible.

Sure it does, phil.

 

[phildwyer]

Sure it does, phil.

Something does, doesn't it?

What do you think that something is?

I bet no-one has ever asked you that before.

 

[Edie]

Just wondering why you should explode with intolerant rage just because I dared express a personal viewpoint that you didn't like.

Your viewpoint itself is utterly irrelevant. Your delivery was problematic.

 

[editor]

Something does, doesn't it?

What do you think that something is?

I bet no-one has ever asked you that before.

Gosh. So profound.

 

[phildwyer]

Gosh. So profound.

But answer came there none.

 

[editor]

Your viewpoint itself is utterly irrelevant. Your delivery was problematic.

Personally, I found your abusive outburst far more problematic.

 

[Edie]

Seeing as you can't actually fight with editor without being banned I'm out of this un.

 

[editor]

But answer came there none.

God told me to keep it to myself. He didn't want me to let the cat out of the bag.

 

[editor]

Seeing as you can't actually fight with editor without being banned I'm out of this un.

And now you're resorting to posting up blatant lies. Shame on you.

 

[DexterTCN]

Seeing as you can't actually fight with editor without being banned I'm out of this un.

Not as bad as what God would do, to be fair.

 

[phildwyer]

God told me to keep it to myself. He didn't want me to let the cat out of the bag.

It's no great mystery.

You won't get far here if you only come to mock. We think that's rather stupid and pathetic round here.

 

[Mr.Bishie]

Personally, I found your abusive outburst far more problematic.

You found post #1206 abusive?

Jesus.

 

[editor]

You won't get far here if you only come to mock. We think that's rather stupid and pathetic round here.

Bless. Phil's trying the time-honoured "we" line again. It doesn't half make you look silly, you know.

 

[frogwoman]

I've still no idea what you actually believe tbh

Nor do I. I am a bit observant and believe in God a bit but got no idea if there's something out there, I try and be a good person although I don't always succeed and I follow a lot of it because find it comforting and helps me to be disciplined. I do believe a bit but I've got too many doubts to be as religious as I used to be, but having doubts and questioning things is really important. And that's not just true of religion it's true of anything.

 

[editor]

You found post #1206 abusive?

Jesus.

I did find the bit about "stomping down to Brixton and having it fucking out with you" a little abusive, yes.

 

[phildwyer]

Bless. Phil's trying the time-honoured "we" line again. It doesn't half make you look silly, you know.

You should read the first chapter of The Brothers Karamazov.

It's about a mocker.

It's called "The Old Buffoon."

 

[LiamO]

Seeing as you can't actually fight with editor without being banned I'm out of this un.

Yeah. Bit of a God-complex innit.

 

[Mr.Bishie]

I did find the bit about "stomping down to Brixton and having it fucking out with you" a little abusive, yes.

It was rhetorical. Even I saw that

 

[editor]

You should read the first chapter of The Brothers Karamazov.

It's about a mocker.

It's called "The Old Buffoon."

No thanks, although you should perhaps reflect on why you suddenly felt empowered to speak on behalf of these unnamed others mid-debate.

 

[LiamO]

I did find the bit about "stomping down to Brixton and having it fucking out with you" a little abusive, yes.

Well I'm going to stomp over to my local and 'have it fucking out with you' in my head

 

[frogwoman]

And as regards purgatory and all that, well we won't know until we're there so no point even thinking about it in my opinion.

 

[editor]

Well I'm going to stomp over to my local and 'have it fucking out with you' in my head

Oh, that's very good. Right up there with your best.

 

[LiamO]

Have a snickers...

 

[Frances Lengel]

i'm missing where the policies of privatisation, monetarism and self-help attitude core to thatcherite politics can be found in that attitude. or are you just using thatcherite as an insult?

Well no, Haystacks himself has used Thatcherite as an adjective to describe selfish behaviour or an "I'm doing what I'm doing and I don't give a fuck what you think about it" type attitude, so I think it only fair that the same rules should apply to our country cousin.