I very much hope this swerves far away from the mess that was Prometheus and comes closer to Alien, which strikes me as the film to invoke here rather than that of a director with a very different style from that of Scott.Visually this is what you would expect from Scott - but I very much hope that the film builds and expands upon 'Prometheus', rather than swerving away in the direction of Cameron's 'Aliens'.
I very much hope this swerves far away from the mess that was Prometheus and comes closer to Alien, which strikes me as the film to invoke here rather than that of a director with a very different style from that of Scott.
I think I've just lost all respect for your taste in films.We just have to disagree, 'Prometheus' is a far more intriguing - 'Alien' is a good film (especially visually) - but it really isn't more than 'Jaws' in space.
I think I've just lost all respect for your taste in films.
I don't think attempting to skew the Alien universe towards 2001 via Chariot of the Gods mumbojumbo makes for an interesting or original story. Prometheus looked nice and had a few decent individual scenes, but it was a completely schizophrenic film where Ridley Scott couldn't make up his mind what story he did want to tell.Come on, 'Alien' is a good film but that is largely because of the visual impact and the way the story is told. It also has a very strong female character. But beyond that? 'Prometheus' was flawed, and appears to have been a work in progress in shooting (the deleted scenes indicate this especially), but at least it tried to tell an interesting story.
I think I've just lost all respect for your taste in films.
Alien only is "Jaws in space" if you manage to totally ignore any of its subtext.
I don't think attempting to skew the Alien towards 2001 via Chariot of the Gods mumbojumbo makes for an interesting or original story. Prometheus looked nice and had a few decent individual scenes, but it was a completely schizophrenic film where Ridly Scott couldn't make up his mind what story he did want to tell.
I don't believe a film necessarily need to have a great "story" to be a great film or to be able to say something interesting. Films aren't books. On the surface Alien may just be Jaws or And Then There Were None in space, but there are so many interesting ideas woven into that. It's not just that the film has a strong female lead which was most unusual then for a big budget science fiction film, the whole film is a nightmare exploration of sexual violence and male/male tensions, not to talk of its critique of corporate culture and it's genuinely novel take on an alien life cycle.
It's not neccesarely the story which makes a film it's how the story gets told cinematically (mise en scene). On the surface Vertigo, my favourite film and considered Hitchcock's masterpiece, has a story which is full of plot holes and it falls apart on close examination. It's the subtext which is woven through the film which makes the film great and whereits true meaning lies. This idea that the best film is the one with the best story is such a British idea and it comes from it being a literary more than a visual culture.
No, it was just a mismash of unoriginal ideas.Come on, 'Alien' is a good film but that is largely because of the visual impact and the way the story is told. It also has a very strong female character. But beyond that? 'Prometheus' was flawed, and appears to have been a work in progress in shooting (the deleted scenes indicate this especially), but at least it tried to tell an interesting story.
No, it was just a mismash of unoriginal ideas.
Prometheus is the Highlander 2 of the Alien series.Anyone who rates Prometheus over Alien should be ban themselves from ever again commenting in this forum. Embarrassing. Prometheus was a passable romp with some appropriate moments of wtf and eye-candy, but unlike Alien it never even rose a shaky middle finger to the genre conventions, nor did it, as already commented on, have an interesting or coherent plot.
what does that make 3 then, the interesting but flawed one?Prometheus is the Highlander 2 of the Alien series.
I would never compare Prometheus to Highlander 3. It could never be that bad.what does that make 3 then, the interesting but flawed one?
Sadly it was neither original or particularly interesting. I tried to like it, or at least find it interesting, but it was just a confused mess.Interesting and original are not the same thing.
I wouldn't mind a reboot tbf. The idea itself is cool enough.Apart from the first, the other, what - 4? just merge into one slow delta of mediocrity.
It's the only way to be sure.I think Aliens is by far the best film of the franchise.
There, I've said it. Game over man. Game over
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit.
See, I disagree, but I can respect that. Aliens is a damned fine action horror. I'd say it doesn't have the raw nerve of Alien, but it does make up for that in sheer kinetic impact.I think Aliens is by far the best film of the franchise.
There, I've said it. Game over man. Game over
I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit.
We just have to disagree, 'Prometheus' is a far more intriguing - 'Alien' is a good film (especially visually) - but it really isn't more than 'Jaws' in space.