Wilf
Slouching towards Billingham
Absolutely.I think it is possible to be equally as pissed off with the ludicrously short sentences given for rape as it is to be pissed off with the rapist themselves.
Absolutely.I think it is possible to be equally as pissed off with the ludicrously short sentences given for rape as it is to be pissed off with the rapist themselves.
Yes, it's true, 'clicktivism' has maybe displaced genuine political activity, bu there are a hell of a lot of campaigners putting in some real graft around rape, dv etc.I don’t see any petitions on rape sentencing, unfortunately – an absence that adds to a nagging sense about this latest chapter in the Great Outrage Wars: that clicktivism, and feminist clicktivism too often, is overly preoccupied with fighting the battles it can win relatively easily, rather than the much more ambitious ones it should try to win
it's a crap article. A false dichotomy and simply wrong about people not repeatedly complaining about far too light sentences. Almost as if the shitty rag felt they need to provide a bit of pseudo-balance.I think I agree with Marina Hyde in this piece (she normally writes well, but this isn't her best) - on the role model bit, but even more so on rape sentencing being the bigger issue.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/jan/06/ched-evans-law-marina-hyde
edit - certainly don't agree with the headline, I do have a problem with the clubs seeking to sign him. Anyway, i think there's something useful in there about stopping clubs signing him being 'easy victories'.
Just a slight side to this, i imagine the club that takes him will have to employ extra security, home and away, another, albeit a small further financial cost to them.
Just cant believe the fil. What kind of man, father of a daughter, goes out of his way to support a bastard like that.
I would be happy to have words on the terraces.
Beat you to it with my self criticism (by 3 minutes)!it's a crap article. A false dichotomy and simply wrong about people not repeatedly complaining about far too light sentences. Almost as if the shitty rag felt they need to provide a bit of pseudo-balance.
I'm always quite astonished by the amount of rape apologists that there are
I'm always quite astonished by the amount of rape apologists that there are
You would think these clubs might sound out the sponsors before they even fly a kite on signing evans. I'd imagine ther's fairly regular contact between the marketing departments of club and sponsor. Maybe they do and get ambiguous feedback - the sponsors only taking a 'moral' stance when they see the level of public opposition.Verlin has formally ended their sponsorship. Mecca Bingo has promised to once the announcement of his signing is public. In light of the Indy's article on the club's finances and motivation, once may don the tin foil balaclava and imagine the owner wants the club to go bust, then there'd be not much in the way of his planning applications...
it's a crap article. A false dichotomy and simply wrong about people not repeatedly complaining about far too light sentences. Almost as if the shitty rag felt they need to provide a bit of pseudo-balance.
The sort of man who sees it as an investment. If he bribes Evans way back into football, his outlay will be nothin compared to the riches to come (possibly for his daughter, rather than him). Sick fuck.
You would think these clubs might sound out the sponsors before they even fly a kite on signing evans. I'd imagine ther's fairly regular contact between the marketing departments of club and sponsor. Maybe they do and get ambiguous feedback - the sponsors only taking a 'moral' stance when they see the level of public opposition.
No one denies thatI understand why people don't want to support a team he'll be playing on, but I'm also pretty sure if he was a gardener no one would even know who he is. The guy has a right to earn a living
why? He can perform many roles within the same general field, but he has absolutely no right to carry on in his former profession. I wouldn't be able to do so, neither would many other people.at his trade
what? So we should stop complaining about this mere 'media story' because of its effect upon the woman Evans raped? Maybe he should just tell his band of merry supporters to stop harassing her.It's a great media story but it also seems to have the very unpleasant side effect of making his victims life even more of a misery because she keeps getting named on social media.
I understand why people don't want to support a team he'll be playing on, but I'm also pretty sure if he was a gardener no one would even know who he is. The guy has a right to earn a living at his trade once he's out of prison.
His girlfriend seems very understanding, couldn't see my wife standing by me if I was filmed taking a drunk girl to my hotel room for a threesome. Not unless she was standing on my balls.
It's a great media story but it also seems to have the very unpleasant side effect of making his victims life even more of a misery because she keeps getting named on social media.
This is the bit I don't quite understand.
Can someone with a better knowledge of football finances than me (which is probably anyone with any knowledge at all) explain how the figures match up, even if only notional figures?
the sponsors only taking a 'moral' stance when they see the level of public opposition.
I read and liked that article earlier on, but I'm still struggling to see any financial logic even so.
'hes served his time'
If he displayed any guilt this could be a valid argument but he hasn't.
I was going to post something about football still having an element of old style sheepskin coat (was that dotcom's phrase?), local spiv made good style ownership Vs the modern slick corporate model, with all the trappings of modern PR. That distinction does break down though when you think about the way Liverpool plc fucked up the Suarez thing.And do Oldham have any kind of PR section?