Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Accused rapist Ched Evans to be released from prison

Actually, on rereading it (I'm genuinely dopey today - new meds), whilst there's truth in the piece, some of it is quite offensive:
I don’t see any petitions on rape sentencing, unfortunately – an absence that adds to a nagging sense about this latest chapter in the Great Outrage Wars: that clicktivism, and feminist clicktivism too often, is overly preoccupied with fighting the battles it can win relatively easily, rather than the much more ambitious ones it should try to win
Yes, it's true, 'clicktivism' has maybe displaced genuine political activity, bu there are a hell of a lot of campaigners putting in some real graft around rape, dv etc.
 
I think I agree with Marina Hyde in this piece (she normally writes well, but this isn't her best) - on the role model bit, but even more so on rape sentencing being the bigger issue.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/jan/06/ched-evans-law-marina-hyde
edit - certainly don't agree with the headline, I do have a problem with the clubs seeking to sign him. Anyway, i think there's something useful in there about stopping clubs signing him being 'easy victories'.
it's a crap article. A false dichotomy and simply wrong about people not repeatedly complaining about far too light sentences. Almost as if the shitty rag felt they need to provide a bit of pseudo-balance.
 
Just a slight side to this, i imagine the club that takes him will have to employ extra security, home and away, another, albeit a small further financial cost to them.
Just cant believe the fil. What kind of man, father of a daughter, goes out of his way to support a bastard like that.
I would be happy to have words on the terraces. :facepalm:

The sort of man who sees it as an investment. If he bribes Evans way back into football, his outlay will be nothin compared to the riches to come (possibly for his daughter, rather than him). Sick fuck.
 
it's a crap article. A false dichotomy and simply wrong about people not repeatedly complaining about far too light sentences. Almost as if the shitty rag felt they need to provide a bit of pseudo-balance.
Beat you to it with my self criticism (by 3 minutes)! :)
 
Verlin has formally ended their sponsorship. Mecca Bingo has promised to once the announcement of his signing is public. In light of the Indy's article on the club's finances and motivation, once may don the tin foil balaclava and imagine the owner wants the club to go bust, then there'd be not much in the way of his planning applications...
 
I'm always quite astonished by the amount of rape apologists that there are :hmm:

The comments under that indy article are depressing, but it's what you come to expect. There's even someone saying Ched Evans is being persecuted because he's white, because a black convicted criminal is playing elsewhere in the league. :rolleyes:
 
Verlin has formally ended their sponsorship. Mecca Bingo has promised to once the announcement of his signing is public. In light of the Indy's article on the club's finances and motivation, once may don the tin foil balaclava and imagine the owner wants the club to go bust, then there'd be not much in the way of his planning applications...
You would think these clubs might sound out the sponsors before they even fly a kite on signing evans. I'd imagine ther's fairly regular contact between the marketing departments of club and sponsor. Maybe they do and get ambiguous feedback - the sponsors only taking a 'moral' stance when they see the level of public opposition.

Again, without reviving the Marina Hyde piece :) , there is something ritualistic about these withdrawals of sponsorship. I find it hard to see these companies being worried about anything other than 'protecting the brand'. [edit: I think I'll enter that final sentence into the annual 'Statements of the Bleedin Obvious' competition]
 
Last edited:
it's a crap article. A false dichotomy and simply wrong about people not repeatedly complaining about far too light sentences. Almost as if the shitty rag felt they need to provide a bit of pseudo-balance.

Just read it -- complete crap and false dichotomy as you say.

Don't agree with your second sentence though -- this is simply Marina Hyde being perverse (and worse). The David Conn articles previously were far better reads :

In the Ched Evans case the victim must always be remembered

Oldham's choice over Ched Evans : money or morals

Not sure if the above two have been linked to already? Apols if so.

Any pseudo-balance there is Marina Hyde's bizarre own IMO.
 
I understand why people don't want to support a team he'll be playing on, but I'm also pretty sure if he was a gardener no one would even know who he is. The guy has a right to earn a living at his trade once he's out of prison.

His girlfriend seems very understanding, couldn't see my wife standing by me if I was filmed taking a drunk girl to my hotel room for a threesome. Not unless she was standing on my balls.

It's a great media story but it also seems to have the very unpleasant side effect of making his victims life even more of a misery because she keeps getting named on social media.
 
The sort of man who sees it as an investment. If he bribes Evans way back into football, his outlay will be nothin compared to the riches to come (possibly for his daughter, rather than him). Sick fuck.

This is the bit I don't quite understand.

Can someone with a better knowledge of football finances than me (which is probably anyone with any knowledge at all) explain how the figures match up, even if only notional figures?

On the one hand we've got the loss of sponsorship deals - one definitely gone, another expected to go, possibly others to go and likely to be other Evans-related costs to take into account, all of which the FIL has promised to cover. On the other hand there's Evans' salary for an (apparently) struggling D1 club.

Given all the publicity, Evans will surely remain tarnished by this for the rest of his potential career (even if he is eventually successful in his appeal, far more so than if he had waited for the result of that appeal and then made a comeback if successful). He's not ever going to play for Wales again or get to play for one of the real elite, is he, Oldham is surely the best he's ever likely to do?
 
You would think these clubs might sound out the sponsors before they even fly a kite on signing evans. I'd imagine ther's fairly regular contact between the marketing departments of club and sponsor. Maybe they do and get ambiguous feedback - the sponsors only taking a 'moral' stance when they see the level of public opposition.


I don't get that either, hence my previous comment about Verlin Rainwater Solutions showing a lot more sense and nous than Oldham seem capable of.

This suggestion that Evans's fiancee's father will cover any commercial shortfall caused by the club signing him is insane -- he'd better be careful what he promises. Costly promise, could be!

And do Oldham have any kind of PR section?
 
I understand why people don't want to support a team he'll be playing on, but I'm also pretty sure if he was a gardener no one would even know who he is. The guy has a right to earn a living
No one denies that

at his trade
why? He can perform many roles within the same general field, but he has absolutely no right to carry on in his former profession. I wouldn't be able to do so, neither would many other people.

It's a great media story but it also seems to have the very unpleasant side effect of making his victims life even more of a misery because she keeps getting named on social media.
what? So we should stop complaining about this mere 'media story' because of its effect upon the woman Evans raped? Maybe he should just tell his band of merry supporters to stop harassing her.
 
I understand why people don't want to support a team he'll be playing on, but I'm also pretty sure if he was a gardener no one would even know who he is. The guy has a right to earn a living at his trade once he's out of prison.

His girlfriend seems very understanding, couldn't see my wife standing by me if I was filmed taking a drunk girl to my hotel room for a threesome. Not unless she was standing on my balls.

It's a great media story but it also seems to have the very unpleasant side effect of making his victims life even more of a misery because she keeps getting named on social media.

No one is arguing for one moment he can't go and mow lawns somewhere. (As long as it's not a school etc.) :facepalm:
 
the sponsors only taking a 'moral' stance when they see the level of public opposition.

In the case of Verlin it does seem to be a moral stance on the part of the boss.

Mecca Bingo may or may not be, it's their job to protect their brand. 90% of their customers are women. Not rocket surgery.
 
how likely is it that he'll actually play for Oldham? surely sponsors aren't going to like the profile of a convicted unrepentant rapist wearing thier name on his shirt?
 
And do Oldham have any kind of PR section?
I was going to post something about football still having an element of old style sheepskin coat (was that dotcom's phrase?), local spiv made good style ownership Vs the modern slick corporate model, with all the trappings of modern PR. That distinction does break down though when you think about the way Liverpool plc fucked up the Suarez thing.
 

Yeah, I read that already. It explains why it might make sense for Oldham to sign him under the reported condition of the FIL covering all the potential losses (although isn't the idea that they could sell him on for £3m in a few years open to question?)

What I'm asking is for figures to back up the idea that the FIL will be getting a good return on his investment (to put it crudely) by bribing Oldham to sign him.

In other words, what sort of salary are they likely to be paying him, and how does that compare to the lost sponsorships etc?
 
Gonna give the cops/stewards a bit of work at the football ground with cries of 'rapist' and projectiles being thrown etc, having worked in a football ground, i don't envy any stewards who have to be there on the first matchday... And I predict this will lose Oldham huge numbers of ticket sales
 
Back
Top Bottom