Rushy
basically a scrotum
It's the first time I've seen anything quite like this:
These Brixton flats are missing something quite important
These Brixton flats are missing something quite important
It's greed leading the stupid.A former office block in Acre Lane gained permission to be converted into eight self-contained flats. Developers Build Consultants began work in September 2014.
Under new regulations, landlords who own office space are able to convert it to housing without planning permission from the council.
Set across the first and second floors, the block of flats contains two one bedroom apartments and six two bedroom properties.
But some of the homes do not feature any windows – instead being fitted with “light wells”.
The light wells, vertical shafts roofed with glass, allow in natural light, but there are no windows on any of the interior walls.
Office to residential conversion= fewer regs.I'd be interested to see how it meets building regs.
That's not true. Office to residential is only a planning consideration. Still needs to meet same building regs.Office to residential conversion= fewer regs.
Probably most useful as parking for some oligarch's money.
Are there rules about how much daylight a citizen is legally entitled to get?That's not true. Office to residential is only a planning consideration. Still needs to meet same building regs.
BTL'ers. Probably not gonna be an overly popular purchase choice for someone looking for a home, but as an "investment", the BTL parasites will lap it up.That is fucking appalling Someone will snap it up though. Seriously awful state of affairs - and it's going to get much, much worse before it gets any better, if ever it does
They'd probably only be looking at some pleb's horrid house anyway, windows are overratedI've been in flats where the windows give great views of nextdoor's brickwork - this doesn't seem any worse to me
In planning, sort of. Lambeth last year adopted the BRE guidelines on daylight and sunlight in the Local Plan so that they are mandatory (although it would appear that some of their officers don't understand this). But this is permitted development (office to residential conversion) so planning have literally no control over it.Are there rules about how much daylight a citizen is legally entitled to get?
I'd be interested to see how it meets building regs.
But after a heavy night, who *hasn't* wished they were closer to the bog?I don't know what country this 'home' is in, but I just spotted this on the Terrible Estate Agents website, and thought of this thread
You'd get a more spacious and pleasant environment in a low security jail cell.
My bad. I took that impression from the article but I don't have any knowledge in this domain.That's not true. Office to residential is only a planning consideration. Still needs to meet same building regs.
More detailed plans can be found here:
http://mr0.homeflow.co.uk/files/property_asset/image/3044/0007/84998_305_s_DOC_00.pdf
The 1st floor flats have lightwells reaching up to windows at 2nd floor level, and the 2nd floor flats have Velux rooflights over each room.
The building regs are mainly interested in ventilation (as well as thermal performance) when it comes to windows. It looks like they can comply as the windows at the top of the lightwells from the 1st floor can be opened from below, and so can Velux rooflights.
It would probably be a bit miserable living in a flat where you can't look out a window, but I don't immediately see anything particularly problematic as far as building regs are concerned.
Some boffin will suggest shipping containers for homes next
Some boffin will suggest shipping containers for homes next
The description starts with "invest in happiness". Not sure if they're serious. It's almost _too_ handy for the railway.Look at this £350K pile of rubble:
View attachment 84131
http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/property-54400079.html
One of my favourite ever houses is made of shipping containers - Grand Designs Container Home