Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

300

ChrisFilter said:
I see you left out the bit where you admitted I was right and we had cybersex?
I didn't think the cybersex helped either side of the argument.
 
Orang Utan said:
Die Hard is well cheesy - yippy kay ey motherfucker!
Did you change your tagline and location just for that post or was that a happy coincidence OU?
 
sleaterkinney said:
C'mon, it's like a mild cheddar compared to the overpowering livarot of 300.
Yes, exactly - there is certainly a Scale Of Cheese, but Die Hard is on that scale, no doubt
 
Very different films anyway, can't be compared.

300's strengths are it's beautiful visuals and extremely well choreographed fight scenes that border on dance in places.
 
300 is action packed testoerone and is teh cewl.

If you want history read a book don't watch a movie. Even the more accurate historical movies are rarely that acurate due to script demands from actors, agents, producers, directors etc. etc.
 
Marius said:
300 is action packed testoerone and is teh cewl.

If you want history read a book don't watch a movie. Even the more accurate historical movies are rarely that acurate due to script demands from actors, agents, producers, directors etc. etc.
and the fact that historical fact doesn't always lend itself to a great movie.
 
I thought it was a very poor man's LOTR crossed with a computer game.
I don't mind mindless action - hence die hard being mentioned in my all time favourites list - but this just felt a bit... empty
 
here there be spoilers

sleaterkinney said:
Imagine Aliens with a happy ending etc.
You mean if the woman, child and hero lived? And the robot sidekick? :confused:

300 isn't based on history, it's based on the Frank Miller comic, with a specific style. The main selling point is that the main man sometimes sounds like Sean Connery though. "This Is Shparta!"

And it's a lot fucking better than Die Hard fucking 4. Ooooh I'm going to shoot through me into you....but the bullet will kill you and only annoy me. Fuck off.
 
i thought it was a fine piece of hokum, fully deserving of a place in internets history as a fertile meme-farm, but let's not think it was anything other than a series of cheesy set pieces.
 
bluestreak said:
i thought it was a fine piece of hokum, fully deserving of a place in internets history as a fertile meme-farm, but let's not think it was anything other than a series of cheesy set pieces.


i sat down to watch it expecting some enjoyable nonsense, I had no false expectations.

it was nonsense, but it wasn't in any way enjoyable
 
bluestreak said:
you're weird :p


Jackass is mindless, fratboy, puerile nonsense - but it has moments of slapstick genius.

300 is touted as some kind of camp, kitsch, OTT, nonsensical classic. It's just a weird CGI effect draped over barely competent actors bellowing poorly written lines.

It's actually DULL, which is bad news for an action movie
 
Tis not DULL!!

Didn't know it was touted as that and watched it with a clear head and no expectations and loved it.
 
i dind't either. i watched it cos i thought the comic book was good. i have my criticisms, for example soft focus ridiculousness, and the fact that yes it used the same CGI style as LOTR without adding to it, but meh, when you're watching something that is supposed to be sheer mindless entermatainment these things don't really matter when something is a load of blokes in their undercrackers hitting each other with swords whilst saying cheesy things!
 
Dubversion said:
that's cos you can't even spell most of those words

fawk.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom