Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

What are those columns in the Thames at Blackfriars?

trashpony

trashpony

Hag
Anyone know? They're big ionic fat red columns in a double row between the train track and the bridge. Were they going to make another set of tracks into the station, make the bridge wider or did they just build them in the wrong place?

:confused:
 
When the train goes past I always imagine what it would be like if you had to try jumping from one column to the other without missing and falling into the Thames below. It gives me a delicious little shudder.
 
Same story with the old pier at Swanage - extensive sequences of wooden stakes protruding eerily and ghostily from the briny depths. :eek:
 
acid priest said:
Same story with the old pier at Swanage - extensive sequences of wooden stakes protruding eerily and ghostily from the briny depths. :eek:
Click to expand...

Blimey - has that gone? I did my first ever open water dive off the end of Swanage pier. I'd like to say it's a fond memory but I can think of better places to dive tbh! :rolleyes:
 
I used to get off at blackfriars all the time and I reckon from the platform you could possibly climb over onto the ledge and make the jump to one of the pillars if you were lucky.

On a low tide one maybe twice a month at exactly the right time you can walk up to and touch the poll closest to the south bank.

Did you know the birds carved on blackfriars bridge on the upstream side are all fresh water fish eating birds and on the down stream side sea water birds.
 
trashpony said:
Blimey - has that gone? I did my first ever open water dive off the end of Swanage pier.
Click to expand...
Yeah...although I'm not sure how new the one that's there now is. I think they must have built it directly parallel to the course of the old one at some stage, possible due to decay.
 
ATOMIC SUPLEX said:
Did you know the birds carved on blackfriars bridge on the upstream side are all fresh water fish eating birds and on the down stream side sea water birds.
Click to expand...

No I didn't but I shall go and have a look now :cool:
 
editor said:
All explained here!
The old bridge wasn't strong enough to take modern trains...
Click to expand...

Wasn't the trussed girder structure (to most people's eyes phenomenally ugly, but to industrial archaeologists a thing of beauty) still there until the winter of 1984/1985 rather than having disappeared in 1969 (as claimed in one of those captions?)

Edited to add - I didn't think I was imagining it! 1979 picture
 
My favourite bridge, best viewed from the north side. I read somewhere they couldn’t dynamite the pillars for fear of damaging the other bridges and the possibility of unexploded WWII bombs in the thames.
 
trashpony said:
No I didn't but I shall go and have a look now :cool:
Click to expand...

This is becuase blackfriars was considered to be the point when the thames stopped being the sea. However the thames is still tidal right up until teddington (tide-end-town) and is not a river, the city really should be called 'London-on-sea'.
 
ATOMIC SUPLEX said:
This is becuase blackfriars was considered to be the point when the thames stopped being the sea.
Click to expand...

What is the source for this claim ... :confused: Surely the "Pool of London" is the area east of London Bridge, not Blackfriars Bridge
 
lang rabbie said:
Wha is the source for this claim ... :confused: Surely the "Pool of London" is the area east of London Bridge, not Blackfriars Bridge
Click to expand...

Er yes, but for a start london bridge was already there, anyway I was talking about the tidal thames and where it technicaly stops being the sea and not what area was or was not known as the 'pool of london' (upper and lower). The pool of London was essentualy the london docks definded origonaly simply becuase you could not get any ships though old london bridge, this had nothing to do with sea and river definitions. After the pool of london and further a bit further into the city the thames wasn't thought of as the sea anymore by the watermen etc. When building the new blackfriars it was thought a fun folly to mark this with the river and sea birds. Like I said, this is of course not actualy the true point as the Thames remains tidal up until Teddington.
 
lang rabbie said:
Wasn't the trussed girder structure (to most people's eyes phenomenally ugly, but to industrial archaeologists a thing of beauty) still there until the winter of 1984/1985 rather than having disappeared in 1969 (as claimed in one of those captions?)

Edited to add - I didn't think I was imagining it! 1979 picture
Click to expand...
I can see where I got that from:
In 1969 the old London Chatham and Dover Railway bridge, built in 1864, still spanned the Thames at Blackfriars.

The bridge was then demolished and the railway tracks taken up to provide land for offices such as the Daily Express building to the south, which is somewhat thin as a result.
http://www.brymor.dircon.co.uk/london25/blackf.htm
Click to expand...
Anyone got the correct date?

Here's a nice quote:
Blackfriars Bridge is one of the handsomest in London, and would have a still better effect were not its appearance so seriously marred by the proximity of its neighbour, the Alexandra (London Chatham and Dover Railway) bridge.

It was built in 1864-9 by Mr. William Cubitt from the designs of Mr. Page, architect also of Westminster-bridge, and though showing a tendency towards the same defects in design which occur in that structure, is beyond all question an immense advance upon it.

It crosses the river in five spans, the centre span being 185 ft. The piers are of granite, surmounted by recesses resting on short pillars of polished red Aberdeen granite, and with ornamental stone parapets.

The parapet of the bridge itself is very low, which, with the extreme shortness of the ornamental pillars at the pier ends, gives the whole structure rather a dwarfed and stunted look; but the general outline is bold and the ensemble rich, if perhaps a trifle gaudy, especially when the gilding, of which there is an unusual proportion, has been freshly renewed.
http://www.victorianlondon.org/thames/blackfriarsbridge.htm
Click to expand...
 
See also http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/speel/london/blackfri.htm

a journal just a couple of years later said:
'With Blackfriars Bridge, we find the public thoroughly well pleased, though the design is really a wonder of depravity. Polished granite columns of amazing thickness, with carved capitals of stupendous weight, all made to give shop-room for an apple-woman, or a convenient platform for a suicide. The parapet is a fiddle-faddle of pretty cast-iron arcading, out of scale with the columns, incongruous with the capitals, and quite unsuited for a work that should be simply grand in its usefulness; and at each corner of the bridge is a huge block of masonry, apropos of nothing, a well-known evidence of desperate imbecility.'
Click to expand...
 
ATOMIC SUPLEX said:
Like I said, this is of course not actualy the true point as the Thames remains tidal up until Teddington.
Click to expand...

Interesting debating point. IIRC Current archaeological opinion is that, before human intervention to start embanking the river and draining Lambeth and the other Marshes, the tidal turning point was actually somewhere around Vauxhall Bridge. The tide only reaches so far upstream because the river now has a so much narrower channel.
 
lang rabbie said:
Interesting debating point. IIRC Current archaeological opinion is that, before human intervention to start embanking the river and draining Lambeth and the other Marshes, the tidal turning point was actually somewhere around Vauxhall Bridge. The tide only reaches so far upstream because the river now has a so much narrower channel.
Click to expand...

Where of course the very first (woodern bronse age) london bridge was built half way accross to a raised marsh patch.

This is all very that the tidal nature of the thames has been changed though human intervention and old london bridge itself would have acted as partial a dam in it's day (the reason the few frost fairs there were were possible) caliming the thames beyond that point.

However this is not true now and of course would not have been when the new Blackfriars was built.
 
lang rabbie said:
Interesting debating point. IIRC Current archaeological opinion is that, before human intervention to start embanking the river and draining Lambeth and the other Marshes, the tidal turning point was actually somewhere around Vauxhall Bridge. The tide only reaches so far upstream because the river now has a so much narrower channel.
Click to expand...

And from the foundation of the original London Bridge until it was demolished and replaced in the 19th century the tidal reach stopped there (due to the narrow span between the arches, narrowed even further by the brick piers the arches sat on).
 
The Waterloo and City line route is somewhere underneath the Blackfiars area - which would also be a bit of a disincentive to muck around with the river bed ..... can never be too carefull
 
davesgcr said:
The Waterloo and City line route is somewhere underneath the Blackfiars area - which would also be a bit of a disincentive to muck around with the river bed ..... can never be too carefull
Click to expand...
The W&C line is considerably deeper than the river bed though. It's actually the deepest line on the entire underground - approximately 165m down IIRC? I don't think there'd be much to worry about there. :cool:
 
ViolentPanda said:
"London's Thames" by Gavin Weightman is an informative read too.
Click to expand...

I know Gavin Weightman quite well. He will be pleased he has come up on a discussion of anything thames. He will proabaly have a drink to celibrate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

editor
Are there any decent/interesting/quirky pubs in and around Canary Wharf?
Replies
26
Views
695
jimbarkanoodle
J
Helen Back
Where in London can I buy electronic mouse traps?
Replies
17
Views
373
Puddy_Tat
Puddy_Tat
Helen Back
Where can we find a household rubbish removal service in West London that will take away heavy kitchen stuff from indoors and upstairs?
Replies
2
Views
207
Helen Back
Helen Back
Silas Loom
Where in the South East shall we decree a glorious new conurbation with room for a million souls and easy commutes to London?
2 3
Replies
67
Views
3K
Silas Loom
Silas Loom
friendofdorothy
LGBT celebration at the bt tower
Replies
1
Views
224
friendofdorothy
friendofdorothy
Back
Top Bottom