That is utterly shite.This is actually quite reasonable isn't it?
The baby's face looks a bit like it was stuck on there using photoshop.
I quite like this:
Based on Madonna and child - crude religious art...Aryan idealistic fantasy.
Serious issues with the shadows and perspective here. If you're going for that crisp, lifelike look you've got to get the basics right. The colours are pretty drab but there are some nice textures there, nothing too clever but well executed.
twentythreedomThis is a bit better from Churchill but he's completely fucked up that front mast.
That's by Hitler.
Shades of Cezanne there. The composition is a bit off with that big splodge of brown in the bottom right but overall I quite like this one.
Cezanne was considered a degenerate artist by the Nazis along with Picasso and several hundred modernist artists.
I thought that one was a Churchill.
Churchill was self-taught, but was friends with Sir John Lavery, W R Sickert and particularly William Nicholson, who he said he had helped him.Have to wonder who taught them and how much 'influence' the teachers had.
This is actually quite reasonable isn't it?
you're assuming the models had the usual number of figures. but being as hitler was something of a monster i wouldn't be surprised if he'd chosen his models for their polydactyllery or whatnotHitler was shit at drawing hands, they haven't even got the right number of fingers.
you're assuming the models had the usual number of figures. but being as hitler was something of a monster i wouldn't be surprised if he'd chosen his models for their polydactyllery or whatnot
You're wrong, the boat is heeling plus spars aren't necessarily set at right angles. But there are other far worse errors than that anyway.