Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

What can one deduce from locomotive wheel arrangements?

mrs quoad

Well-Known Member
Other than the arrangement of wheels, of course.

Are there general rules of thumb as to the types and purposes of engines that might be best served by different configurations?

I see - for example - that 6-2-0 James was an experimental engine rebuild, of a broader type generally used as tender engines. Might one have been able to deduce the rendering aspect from the 0? Does the 6 imply anything, and / or relate to power? And why might one want more or less leading wheels?
 
I guess it's all to do with power/load ratios but here's a handy chart:


Steam Locomotive Classes
 
I was going to go for 'one can deduce that the questioner has never touched a woman', but in mrs quoad case I'd humbly suggest that this interest may be a result of some form of breakdown given the stress of the recent holiday from hell..

See posts passim for further details.
Touching a woman is the root of this problem.

I was never remotely interested in trains, until we had a toddler.

Now, most evenings, he's choosing three Railway Stories books. (Rev Awdry's 26-volume collection, which includes the Thomas &c. stories). Each Railway Stories book contains 3-4 stories.

There are lots of details in there. Lots, and lots, and lots of details.

I find I have become interested in steam trains.

(My wife won't even listen to an explanation of why Thomas is clearly a tank engine, as opposed to some of the obvious tender engines. I note that in our toddler's far more recent Thomas and Friends magazine, pretty much all of the trains have been de-tanked. Except thomas.)
 
I have to say I'm puzzled by this appearance of a very, very small E30 M3. I don't know where it fits amongst Macbooks and speciality coffee and Guildfords. Have you now captured the concept of semi-vintage cars for your own?
 
You could start with a day out with Thomas, that ever so charming little tank engine Meet Thomas and his friends at a railway near you « Wilson Digital Media t/a Online Ticketing and ask the rather large controller to explain these things to you.

th


Im partial to a West Country Class which is a 4-6-2

Img_1393.jpg
 
I have to say I'm puzzled by this appearance of a very, very small E30 M3. I don't know where it fits amongst Macbooks and speciality coffee and Guildfords. Have you now captured the concept of semi-vintage cars for your own?
The toddler chooses boring cars. And appears to have hidden this one in my jeans money pocket.

I chose a more interesting one for myself this evening. He insisted on a £2 orange truck.
 
Sadly owing to my ill-formed, malign ,stereotyping predujice I can't but see a model railway shop as little other than a nonce-magnet. And I fear if I was to ever step inside such a place my predujices would be confirmed.

Paedo uses miniature train to lure children

On a slight tangent though these models look good ......:D (Not that I condone voyeuristic harrasement that appears to be happening in pic 1) A hole has been found in the nudist camp wall. The police are looking into it.

Model railway fans buying up miniature doggers, prostitutes, Peeping Toms and nudists

model-railway-minatures-sex-nudists-doggers-263540.jpg


model-railway-fugures-sex-doggers-prostitutes-nudists-563329.jpg

Model-railway-figures-sex-doggers-prostitutes-nudists-263542.jpg
 
Last edited:
mrs quoad - don't get me started on railways and locomotive wheel arrangements.
There is a relatively simple, no - straightforward - explanation for them.
I don't have a break long enough at the moment to type it out, but if you can hang on for a while ...
 
Are the reasons for the wheel/axel arrangement much different from a lorry? The greater the load the more the axel's. Except with a lorry you have wheels that steer, wheels that don't, hubs that are prominent and hubs that are recessed. After all, many axels make light work :)

996f198096f321495670744d6c3df8dc.jpg
 
The max speed is determined by the diameter of the largest wheels (the driven ones) because they don't have gears.
Er...locomotives with small wheels didn't have gears, either. I've generally assumed that they went for large wheels because the engineering wasn't up to very rapidly reciprocating stuff, so you get more metres per revolution with large wheels than with small. Or, to put it another way, fewer reciprocations per km.

These things had tiny driving wheels (5'0"), but could do 90mph

349261595a866265c04650b50349aec8.jpg

But they were at the pinnacle of steam engine design, so I presume they'd got the design and engineering finessed to the point that you could afford to have everything thundering back and forth 200+ times per km without the engine shaking itself to bits, or smashing up the track.
 
Back
Top Bottom