Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Urgent news about Critical Mass in London - Fri 31st Aug 2012

co-op

But....but cLoWnFiSh....
Apologies if there's already a thread somewhere on this, but just had this email on the Lambeth cyclists list;

Subject: Critical Mass alert

You will probably remember the disruption of last month's Critical Mass bike ride by the police (see, for example, http://bikesalive.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/defend-the-critical-mass-182). Hence the importance of a good turn-out this month (ie Friday 31 August), to show that cyclists won't accept restrictions that aren't placed on other road users, and aren't going to accept intimidation by the police, and will insist on the right to move peacefully around our city by bike as usual, wherever the mood takes us.

NOW READ ON...

In the last day or so, information has emerged of what seems to be a new "under cover" attempt to disrupt the August CM ride. An individual has asked for, and received, permission from the police to organise a policed bike ride on Friday evening, with a pre-approved route, BEGINNING AT THE SAME TIME AND PLACE AS THE REGULAR CRITICAL MASS RIDE (ie meeting at 6pm onwards under the south end of Waterloo Bridge, by the river).

By definition, this ride is not a CM event, for which there are never advance plans for routes, destinations, etc; there never can be a "planned" CM event, since there is no-one and no CM structure to take any such decision. The House of Lords, no less, has ruled that the regular Critical Mass bike rides in London are exempt from any need to notify the police.

It's hard to think of any reason for this individual's personal application to the police, other than as a deliberate attempt to cause confusion and to give the Met an opening to disrupt - or try to take charge of - the ride again this month.

It was always going to be important to have a good turn-out this month. With this latest news, that good turn-out, and the insistence on cycling where we want to without needing police permission, is even more essential.

It would be helpful if people would urgently circulate this information as widely as possible, and encourage cyclists to turn out on Friday evening in the normal spirit of a free CM ride that requires no sanction from, and accepts no special control by, the police, and which ignores attempts by anyone to take control of the ride.
 
What exactly are these events for?

Beyond it being a laugh to slow down traffic I dont really understand the reasons behind it
 
No i do not cycle, hence why i asked Onket.

There seems to be a mixed message as to the reasons for the events which is why I wondered if it was political or just for a laugh...
 
Despite the humourlessness of some politicos, it is actually possible to be political AND have a laugh.

Point me in the direction of these mythical creatures.:D

Have you ever been on one of these rides? If so what do they mean to you?

I'm not trying to be a prick im genuinely curious
 
Well, I don't ride a bike because my sight isn't good enough but I would actually feel safe in a large group of cyclists. I think that's partly the point.
 
I'd be up for that...although i'd have to go buy a bike first ;)
another time maybe mate

I believe our right-on chums in corporate finance may be able to sort you out...

article-1290542350917-0B116288000005DC-511679_636x451.jpg


Seen a few of these on CM over the past year or two but I think they may have just got swept up in the ride rather than starting at the beginning.
 
I believe our right-on chums in corporate finance may be able to sort you out...

Seen a few of these on CM over the past year or two but I think they may have just got swept up in the ride rather than starting at the beginning.

Actually I've seen people raising Boris Bikes above their head and cheering when CM has taken over a stretch of road, so I think they are well part of it. Pretty funny since I doubt those bikes are easy to lift!
 
What exactly are these events for?

Beyond it being a laugh to slow down traffic I dont really understand the reasons behind it

Exactly, that's my issue with it. I went a fair few times as it was a new form of direct action against the intransigent travel policies in London during the 90s. Things have changed to a small degree and are perhaps slowly going in the right direction. As with any direct action it always has be rethought and tactical. Critical Mass seems stuck in some mid 90s timewarp.
 
Exactly, that's my issue with it. I went a fair few times as it was a new form of direct action against the intransigent travel policies in London during the 90s. Things have changed to a small degree and are perhaps slowly going in the right direction. As with any direct action it always has be rethought and tactical. Critical Mass seems stuck in some mid 90s timewarp.

I kind of agree with this - when CM began there were so few cyclists in London that some kind of group demonstration of solidarity and support felt really necessary. That's not the case now and I wonder what its present purpose is, but I get a reflex to defend it when the police decide to step up their campaign against it and the email I copied in the OP was calling for some support and I'm happy to back that and publicise it.
 
Seen a few of these on CM over the past year or two but I think they may have just got swept up in the ride rather than starting at the beginning.
They're pretty common at the start now, unfortunate for those who got caught up in the mass arrests, they'll have to add the excess hire charges to their damages claims.
 
I kind of agree with this - when CM began there were so few cyclists in London that some kind of group demonstration of solidarity and support felt really necessary. That's not the case now and I wonder what its present purpose is, but I get a reflex to defend it when the police decide to step up their campaign against it and the email I copied in the OP was calling for some support and I'm happy to back that and publicise it.

But there is still so little safety for cyclists in terms of legal obligations for lorries and decent cycling lanes. I don't even cycle but it seems to be very relevant still to me. More cyclists, but continuing deaths of cyclists too.
 
But there is still so little safety for cyclists in terms of legal obligations for lorries and decent cycling lanes. I don't even cycle but it seems to be very relevant still to me. More cyclists, but continuing deaths of cyclists too.

:D

Don't get me started! I think cars in cities are utterly ridiculous on most grounds but when they are allowed to kill and intimidate with (more or less) total impunity it's clear that we are talking about more than "transport policy" when we demonstrate against them.

But - personally - I'm not sure that CM is doing this now. Things have changed, it genuinely is less "us" vs "them" on the roads in my experience. What comes next is far from clear to me though and for the time being CM is doing an important job.
 
:D

Don't get me started! I think cars in cities are utterly ridiculous on most grounds but when they are allowed to kill and intimidate with (more or less) total impunity it's clear that we are talking about more than "transport policy" when we demonstrate against them.

But - personally - I'm not sure that CM is doing this now. Things have changed, it genuinely is less "us" vs "them" on the roads in my experience. What comes next is far from clear to me though and for the time being CM is doing an important job.

I'm not sure exactly what you mean. They're still 'reclaiming' the streets so still making those statements. Maybe you mean they're not actually doing anything out of the cycle itself to achieve their ends. Or maybe you mean that they've become more moderate so aren't against cars just want a space for bikes with them, so maybe just not radical enough for you anymore but still making some relevant statements.
 
hehe that taxi driver could of had all of you, looked very successful, did you have the popo tok tok following you around?
 
Back
Top Bottom