Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Too poor to play: children in Lambeth social housing blocked from communal playground

This has made me feel really angry:

Too poor to play: children in social housing blocked from communal playground

Lambeth council absolutely not interested and everyone seemingly passing on responsibility. I've not come across this before, but I hope that something will be done about the practice as no doubt it happens elsewhere.

I wasn't aware of the "poor doors" thing either.
I know Lambeth have gone down hill a lot in the last decade or two but this is well out of order.
 
Lambeth are a disgrace, and developers continue to be as scummy as they ever were.

2019-03-26_001018.jpg
At least one multimillion-pound housing development in London is segregating the children of less well-off tenants from those of wealthier homebuyers by blocking them from some communal play areas.

Guardian Cities has discovered that developer Henley Homes has blocked social housing residents from using shared play spaces at its Baylis Old School complex on Lollard Street, south London. The development was required to include a mix of “affordable” and social rental units in order to gain planning permission.

Henley marketed the award-winning 149-home development, which was built in 2016 on the site of a former secondary school, as inclusive and family-friendly. It said the “common areas are there for the use of all the residents”.

But the designs were altered after planning permission was granted to block the social housing tenants from accessing the communal play areas.


Too poor to play: children in social housing blocked from communal playground
 
I used to manage a HA block in Hackney , it was part of a bigger development . There was a playground in the private side which the HA residents didnt have access to. The kids had other ideas and would get in there and play :thumbs:

I had several phone conversations with an angry leaseholder in the private side who demanded that I stop kids playing in the playground :facepalm: I asked him why he wanted kids to stop playing in a playground :rolleyes: he just got :mad: more so when I refused to do what he wanted :thumbs:

This was about 20 years ago .
 
I saw this yesterday. Schurely the plans are still on Lambeth’s Planning portal website, along with a load of documentation that includes the names, email addresses etc of a load of planning officers and the companies involved. Also the names and contact details of the Councillors on the Planning Committee who voted the plans through. I wonder if they were aware of what the intention was?

You know what to do.....
 
I saw this yesterday. Schurely the plans are still on Lambeth’s Planning portal website, along with a load of documentation that includes the names, email addresses etc of a load of planning officers and the companies involved. Also the names and contact details of the Councillors on the Planning Committee who voted the plans through. I wonder if they were aware of what the intention was?

You know what to do.....

It says the changes were approved by Lambeth council, that means some named individual(s) will have signed off on them.
 
Beyond belief. I thought you had a Labour council in Lambeth.

It is astonishing (well, actually, no it isn't, it happens everywhere) how easy it is for property developers to get projects through with bullshit and then not deliver,
 
This story was features on The World at One (R4). Good to hear that parents on both sides of the 'divide' are getting together to try to fight this. Leaving aside the clear immorality, the developers seem to have also misjudged the commercial attraction of the barrier. Lambeth are going to look even worse than they do already once the developer issues the inevitable statement apologising and backing down.
 
Back
Top Bottom