The top inhabitable floors, yes.
The "mascara brush" bit at the very top was originally going to contain passive heat rejection radiators for the a/c system. But a/c efficiency improved greatly since the original design, meaning the radiators were no longer needed. Those floors are too small for any sensible habitable use, so they remain empty.
Seeing as urban has ranked pretty highly in searches for The Shard occasionally and my blog has posted so much coverage, I wrote to them to ask if I could come inside and take some photos (like so many others have done recently).
"Fuck off," they said (in so many words).
Seeing as urban has ranked pretty highly in searches for The Shard occasionally and my blog has posted so much coverage, I wrote to them to ask if I could come inside and take some photos (like so many others have done recently).
"Fuck off," they said (in so many words).
Seeing as urban has ranked pretty highly in searches for The Shard occasionally and my blog has posted so much coverage, I wrote to them to ask if I could come inside and take some photos (like so many others have done recently).
"Fuck off," they said (in so many words).
I was asking to be let in on the basis that I'd posted at least five popular illustrated blog posts on the topic that had - at times - ranked very highly in Google for anyone looking for info about the building's progress.If they were going to let you in on that basis then they should have let in the rest of us who have contributed to this thread as well.
I was asking to be let in on the basis that I'd posted at least five popular illustrated blog posts on the topic that had - at times - ranked very highly in Google for anyone looking for info about the building's progress.
How about you? What articles did you write?
Best get off your arse and write to the Shard's management then. Good luck!I have contributed insightful commentary and quite a lot of photos, some of which were, frankly, excellent. And urban75's google rating (as if that should be a measure of quality) is partly due to the hard work of all us regular posters over the years.
Ulp. That's quite high.
If you did take the stairs, I wonder how long that would be (in length rather than time). It'd have to be over a mile.
It would be about a third of a mile.
0.15 miles high, you would probably need to use some trigonometry to work out the length of staircase.
I think your calculations are a bit out.It's 0.2 miles high. Assuming stairs are at about 45 degrees 0.2 x 1.41 = 0.28 plus a bit extra for landings and the fact that the stairs will be a bit shallower than 45 degrees makes about a third of a mile.
The maximum pitch for domestic stairs is 42°, semi-public stairs, eg factories, offices and common stairs serving more than one dwelling, 38° and public stairs, eg places of public assembly, 33°.
http://www.stairplan.co.uk/regulations.htm
It's 0.2 miles high. Assuming stairs are at about 45 degrees 0.2 x 1.41 = 0.28 plus a bit extra for landings and the fact that the stairs will be a bit shallower than 45 degrees makes about a third of a mile.
I think your calculations are a bit out.
The viewing area is 0.15 miles high. Floors higher than that are not accessible.
It would have been better if it was switched on
It is the wide angle view!
it's calling to the cauldron in the stadium!