Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Should AI copy and paste responses be banned from political discussions here?

AI has its uses, but political debate on here is not one of them. This goes particularly for when people are trying to define their terms, which is a context in which using AI might be tempting. It's slightly less convincing than quoting wikipedia or the dictionary and thinking you've somehow won the argument.

Terms do need defining because we, the humans, are using them. And we need to be the ones doing the defining.
 
you can easily get bulletpoints and headings and numbered paragraphs removed, as in this example:

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized many aspects of our lives, including how we communicate and share information online. One area where AI's influence is growing is in discussion forums. These platforms, which serve as virtual spaces for people to exchange ideas, seek advice, and build communities, are increasingly seeing contributions from AI. This raises an important question: Should AI-generated posts be allowed on discussion forums?

AI can generate content at a rapid pace, keeping forums active and engaging. This can be particularly beneficial for forums that struggle with low activity levels. AI can initiate discussions, respond to queries, and provide information, ensuring that the forum remains lively and dynamic. Unlike human participants, AI can operate around the clock. This means that users can receive responses to their posts at any time, regardless of time zones. This continuous availability can enhance user satisfaction and foster a more inclusive community. AI can provide consistent and accurate information, especially in forums focused on technical or factual topics. AI can quickly retrieve and present information from vast databases, ensuring that users receive reliable answers to their questions. Additionally, AI can assist in moderating forums by identifying and filtering out inappropriate content, spam, and abusive language. This can help maintain a positive and respectful environment, making forums safer and more welcoming for all users.

However, one of the primary concerns with AI-generated posts is the potential loss of authenticity. Discussion forums thrive on genuine human interactions, and the presence of AI can sometimes undermine this authenticity. Users may feel deceived if they discover that they have been interacting with an AI rather than a human. While AI can generate content, it may lack the depth and nuance of human responses. AI-generated posts might miss the emotional and empathetic aspects that are crucial in certain discussions, such as those involving personal experiences or sensitive topics. AI systems are only as good as the data they are trained on. If the training data contains biases or inaccuracies, AI-generated posts can perpetuate these issues. This can lead to the spread of misinformation and reinforce existing biases within the forum. Relying too heavily on AI can lead to a decrease in human participation. If users become accustomed to AI-generated responses, they may be less inclined to contribute themselves, leading to a decline in the diversity of perspectives and ideas.

To address these challenges, it is essential to find a balance between leveraging AI's capabilities and preserving the human element of discussion forums. Clearly indicating when a post is generated by AI can help maintain trust and allow users to make informed decisions about their interactions. Implementing a system where AI-generated posts are reviewed by human moderators before being published can help ensure the quality and appropriateness of the content. Allowing users to choose whether they want to interact with AI-generated content can cater to different user preferences and comfort levels. Regularly updating and refining AI systems to minimize biases and improve the quality of interactions can help address some of the limitations of AI-generated content.

AI-generated posts have the potential to enhance discussion forums by increasing engagement, providing round-the-clock support, and ensuring consistency. However, it is crucial to address the challenges related to authenticity, quality, bias, and dependence. By finding a balance and implementing thoughtful strategies, we can harness the benefits of AI while preserving the human essence that makes discussion forums valuable.

it doesn't matter how the ai is formatted, it is that it is ai which is the real issue
 
Yes, and I'd lean towards banning across the boards, apart from maybe the tech forums where if people want to, say, do comparisons between machines using another machine then I'm not that bothered. But I think it would be troublesome in e.g. relationships forum too, and why should we have to read any of this slop anyway.
 
But this board wasn't set up to hear what AI algorithms think about a subject: it's for people to discuss their opinions and thoughts.
This is spot on I think. The internet can be an alienating place to interact with people.

One of the best things about urban is that, over time, you get a sense of what the people here are like. Because they post about their lives and they write from the heart.

(Another good thing is that forums in general are far less engineered around antagonism than things like twitter/X).

I shan't name the recent "new" poster that seemed to be spewing ChatGPT stuff all over the place but I didn't enjoy it and wouldn't want there to be lots more of that sort of thing.
 
I engaged in some AI debate on a thread with an unusual poster.

It thoroughly depressed me how easy it was to have seemingly coherent and knowledgable debate without having much knowledge about the topic.

The internet was bad enough without it. With it social media is in a death spiral.

Stupid people and stupid positions fashioned into superficial coherent content
 
Many here think so highly of their own opinion. Pathetic, prideful and imprudent blockheads so afraid that AI may actually teach them something.
Go to grass, all of you...
 
It's not slop. The statements generated are reasonable and thoughtful. They are free of ad hominem attacks, insults, bigotry and prejudice, bias or disguised self-interest.

Many of the "humans" here are the ones generating pig slop...

Nah, they're bland shite and often factually inaccurate. Not the sort of fare that provokes discussion and humans sharing knowledge and experience. It's worse than copy and pasting wikipedia.
 
It's not slop. The statements generated are reasonable and thoughtful. They are free of ad hominem attacks, insults, bigotry and prejudice, bias or disguised self-interest.

Many of the "humans" here are the ones generating pig slop...
the statements cannot be thoughtful as they are not the product of thought
they are not reasonable as they are not the product of reason
 
Yes, I think they should be banned but Petcha has a point here:

You're aware that quite a lot of mainstream journalism is using AI now right? So lifting copy from an article from say the Guardian or the NY Times could quite possibly contain AI generated content? Which of course the subs will edit to get it through any filters.

I thought that was why was forum was set up - to discuss these issues. Hopefully without anger.

It's going to get harder and harder to tell.
 
Back
Top Bottom