Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Say hello to Barratt Homes' 'Brixton Square' on Coldharbour Lane (old Cooltan site)

A one bedroom flat is selling for £400,000 and it's being targeted at Buy to Let landlords:

Guide price £400, 000 - £420, 000 Landlords you are not dreaming; this beautiful apartment will make your tenants' commute a dream. This new development from 2013 will place you within walking distance from the excellent transport links at Brixton tube; and with Brixton Village with its' indoor and outdoor markets almost directly adjacent to the development; you will enjoy a multitude of dining, shopping, and entertainment options. A high quality finish throughout the apartment will satisfy the most demanding of tastes, and the luxury fitted kitchen and bathroom are the icing on the cake. Being an investor, you will benefit from a rental income of £1410 pcm, with the current tenancy agreement is due to expire on the 27/06/2015 (confirmation of this will need to be undertaken via your legal advisers).
Read more at http://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/34303660#DKxU4sXqqW7AZFri.99
 
It's deceptively massive, and all the more shameful for having such a tiny. developer-reduced provision of "affordable" housing. Barratts must have made a fucking mint out of this development as did - no doubt - several Buy To Letters.

del.jpg
 
Ha ha ha I've lived here 18 months and I haven't met anyone either, all young professionals, seem to keep themselves to themselves. A simple nod of the head is all you get, or a quick chat in the lift.
I find that really sad. One of the reasons I moved to Brixton was that it seemed to really welcome everyone and I found it easy to make a load of friends.
 
It can be hard if you're used to having close friendships with your neighbours and that all stops, but people's social networks will be a reflection of a number of factors. I don't think either is better or worse tbh, just different.
 
Ha ha ha I've lived here 18 months and I haven't met anyone either, all young professionals, seem to keep themselves to themselves. A simple nod of the head is all you get, or a quick chat in the lift.

You won't even get a nod when the owner-occupiers start using their huge gains to buy new places while letting out their Barratt flats to short-term renters
 
It can be hard if you're used to having close friendships with your neighbours and that all stops, but people's social networks will be a reflection of a number of factors. I don't think either is better or worse tbh, just different.

Some people relish the possibility of anonymity that London offers
 
You won't even get a nod when the owner-occupiers start using their huge gains to buy new places while letting out their Barratt flats to short-term renters
Why not? My neighbours on both sides are renters, as are both houses diagonally opposite, and I am on nodding, chatting and even nipping round for coffee terms with all of them.
 
Why not? My neighbours on both sides are renters, as are both houses diagonally opposite, and I am on nodding, chatting and even nipping round for coffee terms with all of them.

Excellent. But not my experience in this street.

ETA: I meant short-term renters, not longer-term ones
 
Last edited:
Yep that's a fact, next door to me moved out a month ago and I only realised he had rented it out when the short-term renters knocked on my door to say hi, so may be the opposite in fact

Sounds like an increasing number of flats are being kept as investments and rented out. Is that the case?
 
Sounds like an increasing number of flats are being kept as investments and rented out. Is that the case?
No still mainly owner occupiers by a long margin, but was shocked last week as I was talking to a couple who were hanging around in the gardens for ages with a suitcase, it transpires that they had rented an apartment for the weekend on AIR BnB and paid £200 a night
 
Sounds like an increasing number of flats are being kept as investments and rented out. Is that the case?
Sounds to me that he is saying a number of people have used the extra equity caused by the price rise as a spring-board to acquire a better or just another property, meanwhile using the income from the rental to pay off (and more) the first mortgage.

When I moved to London in the 70s it was illegal to rent out property that was personally mortgaged. About time they brought back that restriction. Abolishing it was all part of Mrs Thatcher's right to buy syndrome.
 
What would be the point of that restriction? Why should outright owners be allowed to profit from their property but not mortgage holders? Doesn't it just stack the odds even more in favour of those at the top of the pile?

I'd prefer to have rent controls, which would apply to every landlord regardless of whether they held mortgages or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom