skyscraper101
0891 50 50 50
Love this
David Bowie's performance of Starman on Top of the Pops in 1972 is considered a watershed moment in musical history. Dressed in a snakeskin jumpsuit, he draped his arm around guitarist Mick Ronson, shocking viewers and ushering in an era of glamour and androgyny.
But few people remember that Bowie actually debuted his Ziggy Stardust persona on ITV a month earlier. Long thought to have been erased, the performance has just been unearthed and could feature in a new BBC documentary.
If so, you'll surely be able to produce an example of them resurfacing, rather than linking to a three year old piece by Julie BurchillThree years after this piece, the allegations have suddenly resurfaced in the media ...
David Bowie had sex with underage girls. Is that creepy or cool?
Three years after this piece, the allegations have suddenly resurfaced in the media ...
David Bowie had sex with underage girls. Is that creepy or cool?
They probably didn't want people to think "The First Five Years" was a reference to the age of his youngest sexual conquest.Tonight on BBC 2 at 9pm; David Bowie: Finding Fame. The third part in the Five Years trilogy of films.
Although it was initially called The First Five Years, dunno why they changed the name.
Is that a suitable reaction to talk of Bowie being revealed to have abused children?Yawn
Don't go there. You're fighting a losing battle. Apparently it's OK to abuse children if people like your songs. Gary Glitter was obviously not a good enough singer that people would turn a blind eye to his transgressions.Is that a suitable reaction to talk of Bowie being revealed to have abused children?
Is that a suitable reaction to talk of Bowie being revealed to have abused children?
Have you followed this thread at all? Look at all dear Saul's contributionsIs that a suitable reaction to talk of Bowie being revealed to have abused children?
Anyway, what's it to ya, you sanctimonious old titIs that a suitable reaction to talk of Bowie being revealed to have abused children?
What's it to me? Strange question.Anyway, what's it to ya, you sanctimonious old tit
Gosh, has David Bowie just been revealed to have abused children? That's certainly going to come as a shock to the world of music.Is that a suitable reaction to talk of Bowie being revealed to have abused children?
The yawn was cos it's been mentioned time and time again on this thread. It's been covered, mateWhat's it to me? Strange question.
I'm disturbed that people don't want to know about child abuse just cos it was perpetrated by someone they admire. Something like thst is everyone's business and not to be yawned at and dismissed
It's worth popping in once in a while to remind you that your idol was a nonceHave you followed this thread at all? Look at all dear Saul's contributions
People already know about it, I would be amazed if there is anyone posting regularly on Urban with the slightest interest in Bowie who didn't already know about it while he was still alive.What's it to me? Strange question.
I'm disturbed that people don't want to know about child abuse just cos it was perpetrated by someone they admire. Something like thst is everyone's business and not to be yawned at and dismissed
Do you also monitor the site for mentions of Emmeline Pankhurst, and leap in to remind people she shamed and bullied men, including the mentally and physically disabled, to go and die in the trenches?It's worth popping in once in a while to remind you that your idol was a nonce
He touched a nerve I seeDo you also monitor the site for mentions of Emmeline Pankhurst, and leap in to remind people she shamed and bullied men, including the mentally and physically disabled, to go and die in the trenches?
Or that Malcolm X was a pimp? Or that Mohammed Ali and Martin Luther King were serial adulterers?
Or the same thing you mention about Bowie on the Led Zep, Jimi Hendrix and Stones mentions?
Cos if you are gonna police the boards so diligently you don't wanna be a hypocrite do you?
Certainly has Pickman's. I love Bowie.He touched a nerve I see