I'm off to Poland in mid-April, staying somewhere between Warsaw and Krakow but basically in the middle of nowhere for a week. Won't have much time to hang around before or after that but I'm looking at doing at least one leg of the journey without flying, which will mean an overnight stay somewhere with a bit of time to kill in the evening and morning. Warsaw and Krakow seem like the most obvious options as they both have direct trains back to Berlin but I'm open to staying somewhere else if I can make transport work and anyone wants to try and convince me.
Don't really want to "Do" a long list of touristy stuff, I'm happy just having a wander round unless I end up staying slightly longer somewhere (which might happen as one ferry won't quite get me to London in time for the train I'd ideally get, and the previous ferry is 48 hours earlier). I don't like cities but can enjoy them in small doses. I do like parks and gardens and other naturey stuff. Don't drink alcohol so not really interested in bars etc.
TLDR Krakow vs Warsaw: is one much better / shitter / differenter than the other?
Don't really want to "Do" a long list of touristy stuff, I'm happy just having a wander round unless I end up staying slightly longer somewhere (which might happen as one ferry won't quite get me to London in time for the train I'd ideally get, and the previous ferry is 48 hours earlier). I don't like cities but can enjoy them in small doses. I do like parks and gardens and other naturey stuff. Don't drink alcohol so not really interested in bars etc.
TLDR Krakow vs Warsaw: is one much better / shitter / differenter than the other?