agreed. there isn't a chance that they won't tell their partners, close friends etc.I don't understand why the candidates are allowed to know the results of the postal votes.
The figures were very good for labour though - expected lib-dem postal surge non-existent.
It's a seat labour are strong in and the lib dems aren't targetting. Since where political parties are active they tend to try to get their supporters signed up for postal votes (so they're more likely to vote), it could just be that most of the people voting this way are labour voters, as Labour will have been active in that area signing supporters up.
The result at the end though will likely be differently proportioned, but should still be a Labour hold anyway.
what are the implications? could she be fucked?
They certainly have stepped up their local activity since the first debate. They were the ones expecting the postals to show significant lab-->lib movement as this first tranche were those returned during the week after the first debate.
Only seen Lib Dem posters in Bristol West. Well saw one Green on today but no labour or tory.
I've seen Labour posters in Easton. It confused me, as I'd forgotten that Easton is no longer in Bristol East.
That explains why I've been getting Bristol West bumf.
I can vote for Danny Kushlick then
Redfield - right on the edge of the constituency as it was ...But you don't live in Easton.
Redfield - right on the edge of the constituency as it was ...
What ward are you in?
Hillfields - which is rather rough - do they actually vote there ?
I get Bristol south, an ultrasafe labour seat. I've only had libdem and bnp leaflets, the latter featuring the excellent griffin/Churchill montage