Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

November Photo Comp. -- 'All in the Detail'

DevFAQs mate...seriously if you want to play here just use your other website to Hotlink(no greater than 60k(UrbanFAQs) or leave links...I have seen it ;)


...Devaint make the rules not Urban with regards to Hotlinking/Links to Deviant if you see what I mean.,,,not so long ago that(how i reacted) is how Deviants used to react to other Deviants even within Their 0wn Site if you showed Links... they do trash accounts occasionally for people leaving Links on other sites too...hence the quote about Page Views(from Deviant)....honestly!


If you want to play here....as I say...you are perfectly welcome...don't take what I say as the norm or as Rule setting...feel free to contribute. :)
 
118 entries so far. Is that a record? I suspect so. I'll update the thumbnails at some point today.

Sooooo, shall I put z3rogravity's entries on the thumbnails page? I'd be tempted to say yes, and if people aren't happy with it, they don't have to vote for them. Then the photos can at least be judged on artistic merit, rather than on the faqs of another website. What do people reckon?
 
a people::: nah tell him to piss offf! :D :D :D


"Then the photos can at least be judged on artistic merit, rather than on the faqs of another website."

yeah right!...nothing to with contribution of the community of a site/any site???...bravo!!!...shall I give some of my mates a call?..some more Deviants maybe...they are plenty more skilled wankers over there who would be very happy to share their work... or scour the web for more artistically minded people to up the ante in artistic contribution and then they can start posting meritously?

There's a really kewl doood on Deviant at this very moment...posting thorough choice erection shots with buff boys in bedroom scenes...you can see razor sharp pubes and veins...stunning detail...shall I ask him to come over to contribute for this comp????


Nowt personal Hiccup...only in response to your words


...I've looked around...he's a plonker as far as I can see...takes one to know one...and thaaaaat!.....making loads of effort to get in with people from Brixton here isn't he?????? But I've sure in the fullness of time he'll be stonking along to Offline like the reast of 'em?:??!!!!:rolleyes:


But do what you want people. :)
 
Have another thing people to consider :::


# Status: Official Beta Tester
# Deviations: 79
# Scraps: 3
# Prints: 3
# Deviation Comments: 9
# Deviant Comments: 8
# Deviant Comments Received: 49
# News Comments: 0
# Forum Posts: 0
# Journal Entries: 10
# Shouts: 0
# Favourites: 72


against 4k of page views???

MINE


# Status: Member
# Deviations: 14
# Scraps: 1
# Deviation Comments: 267
# Deviant Comments: 229
# Deviant Comments Received: 190
# News Comments: 51
# Forum Posts: 50
# Journal Entries: 1
# Shouts: 0
# Favourites: 39


against 1.5k


I could be a cunt and get him Banned from there...but I won't...let him prove himself here eh? I look forward to his contribution. :D
 
Rare as it is i agree with squelch.

They are great shots but are commercial shots for sale which have been linked to a site which specifically bans hotlinking to it in this manner, especailly when attempting to via for goods.

This poster has yet to contribute anything else to the board other than this apperent spam. To claim they were unaware of the Deviant Art rules is nonsense as they will have had to read them before siging up for a print account. If they haven't then i'm afriad that's there look out.

I know the spirt of openess and fairness suggests that this person should be allow to enter however I beleive it's that which is being taken advantage of.
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
Rare as it is i agree with squelch.

They are great shots but are commercial shots for sale which have been linked to a site which specifically bans hotlinking to it in this manner, especailly when attempting to via for goods.

This poster has yet to contribute anything else to the board other than this apperent spam. To claim they were unaware of the Deviant Art rules is nonsense as they will have had to read them before siging up for a print account. If they haven't then i'm afriad that's there look out.

I know the spirt of openess and fairness suggests that this person should be allow to enter however I beleive it's that which is being taken advantage of.

I agree, they haven't contributed to the boards at all, fair enough the pictures are excellent but the poster is only a member of these boards in registration only, s/he has had pleny of opportunity to join in other threads
 
Can we have a separate discussion about allleged Deviantart Terms of Service abuses?

Just to keep this one focused on its original topic.
 
squelch said:
You calling me a "plonker"? :D

no

you know my feelings towards you/your opinions in general are less than favourable, however i thought we'd previuosly agree that this thread (photo comps in general) were not the place for airing such linen. :)
 
lozmatic said:
Can we have a separate discussion about allleged Deviantart Terms of Service abuses?

Just to keep this one focused on its original topic.
erm this is entirely relevant to the original topic as the person being discussed may or may not have the entry anulled by virtue of their actions, appropreateness and therefore it is entirely on topic. have you something to contribute as to whether the entries should or should not be allowed?
 
GarfieldLeChat said:
erm this is entirely relevant to the original topic as the person being discussed may or may not have the entry anulled by virtue of their actions, appropreateness and therefore it is entirely on topic. have you something to contribute as to whether the entries should or should not be allowed?
And one that's already taken up over two pages of the topic :rolleyes:

Editor has suggested what we do, and the user has already effectively withdrawn, so let's not include them this time and forget about it. I've found the whole affair quite ridiculous to be honest - I could have hosted them for him and then who could complain? - but let's finish it please without any more drawn-out hyperbole.
 
ha! HA!ha!

mauvais mangue said:
- I could have hosted them for him and then who could complain?

He does have his work separately hosted already...already.. :p

He's a fkkn DevSpammer! :D ,,,firky was right...he's digging himself a hole!


GLC.... it was a joke...LOL!


Piss off Loz...you do the same wiv your Flckr account...or what ever you use! :rolleyes: ,,,....what your Dev name? OR have you started that thread yet?....that'll go far! :eek:
 
mauvais mangue said:
And one that's already taken up over two pages of the topic :rolleyes:

Editor has suggested what we do, and the user has already effectively withdrawn, so let's not include them this time and forget about it. I've found the whole affair quite ridiculous to be honest - I could have hosted them for him and then who could complain? - but let's finish it please without any more drawn-out hyperbole.

what part of this do you not get... (bit in bold for refference?)


hiccup said:
118 entries so far. Is that a record? I suspect so. I'll update the thumbnails at some point today.

Sooooo, shall I put z3rogravity's entries on the thumbnails page? I'd be tempted to say yes, and if people aren't happy with it, they don't have to vote for them. Then the photos can at least be judged on artistic merit, rather than on the faqs of another website. What do people reckon?

therefore it can't be on your say so but has to be discussed with everyone... unless you making arbitary descsions about the photo comp is the way forward for the whole of urban.

instead of your pointless posts which serve only to lengthen the page whilst making these proclimation descions.

and yes you could have hosted them or i could have but then it wouldn't have been the point of the spam would it as it wouldn't have directed users to a page to boost some one's viewing figures in an attempt to higer prioritise their works for sale....

as you said you don't understand so why not let those of us who do understand what went on here have the benifit of the doubt... rather than you attempts to stifle debate...
 
Back
Top Bottom