Nottingham is only 20th poorest place to live using this method:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/mar/29/indices-multiple-deprivation-poverty-england
I don't like Milton Keynes, despite its relative prosperity, because it hasn't got a proper town centre. People I've known who live there all think it's great, though.
Nottingham used to have a Hooters Bar.
Quality of life here is great
It appears to still have one.
Quality of life is more than just disposable income after rent and taxes are removed from wages. I'm sure it's on Wikipedia if you want the text book definition
How did I do?
AFAIK Nottingham tends to look bad in statistical terms because a lot of the more well off areas are technically outside the City so aren't counted. As a 'metropolitan area' or whatever you want to call it it's not so bad.
That's probably true, but it applies to a lot of cities of about Nottingham's size that are also unitary authorities. The boundaries tend to be quite tightly drawn, meaning that a) the population figures don't really reflect the city's size, and b) the more affluent areas fall outside the local authority area and don't show up in the statistics. That's certainly the case in Hull and Leicester, to name two off the top of my head.
Yeah, I'm sure it happens all over the place and you'd need a lot more time, expertise and interest than I have to start picking out the details. I'm really just saying that my personal experience of Nottingham is that it's not that bad and I think the various 'worst this that or the other' stats about the place are a bit misleading.
This can be argued of Manchester to an extent. The only truly affluent areas in the City of Manchester are Chorlton, Withington and Didsbury. All the other posh places tend to be in Trafford (Sale/Altrincham), Salford (although not classed as such, e.g. Irlam, Worsley) and parts of Stockport (the Heatons, Cheadle and its environs) and Bury (Prestwich and Whitefield).That's probably true, but it applies to a lot of cities of about Nottingham's size that are also unitary authorities. The boundaries tend to be quite tightly drawn, meaning that a) the population figures don't really reflect the city's size, and b) the more affluent areas fall outside the local authority area and don't show up in the statistics. That's certainly the case in Hull and Leicester, to name two off the top of my head.