Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Nottingham - worst unemployment figures

I don't like Milton Keynes, despite its relative prosperity, because it hasn't got a proper town centre. People I've known who live there all think it's great, though.
 
I don't like Milton Keynes, despite its relative prosperity, because it hasn't got a proper town centre. People I've known who live there all think it's great, though.

Thats because the people who hated it fucked off as soon as they could. I spent my teen years in a New Town, bloody awful..
 
Quality of life is more than just disposable income after rent and taxes are removed from wages. I'm sure it's on Wikipedia if you want the text book definition :)
 
I grew up in Long Eaton, so Nottingham is my home city, really. I moved to Stoke-on-Trent in 1996, and I remember going to a talk by the then-elected mayor who was extolling the virtues of Nottingham and how it was revitalising the city, trying to convince People Who Matter that Stoke should emulate Nottingham. I remember rolling my eyes then, and now I am doubly-so.
 
AFAIK Nottingham tends to look bad in statistical terms because a lot of the more well off areas are technically outside the City so aren't counted. As a 'metropolitan area' or whatever you want to call it it's not so bad.
 
AFAIK Nottingham tends to look bad in statistical terms because a lot of the more well off areas are technically outside the City so aren't counted. As a 'metropolitan area' or whatever you want to call it it's not so bad.

That's probably true, but it applies to a lot of cities of about Nottingham's size that are also unitary authorities. The boundaries tend to be quite tightly drawn, meaning that a) the population figures don't really reflect the city's size, and b) the more affluent areas fall outside the local authority area and don't show up in the statistics. That's certainly the case in Hull and Leicester, to name two off the top of my head.
 
That's probably true, but it applies to a lot of cities of about Nottingham's size that are also unitary authorities. The boundaries tend to be quite tightly drawn, meaning that a) the population figures don't really reflect the city's size, and b) the more affluent areas fall outside the local authority area and don't show up in the statistics. That's certainly the case in Hull and Leicester, to name two off the top of my head.

Yeah, I'm sure it happens all over the place and you'd need a lot more time, expertise and interest than I have to start picking out the details. I'm really just saying that my personal experience of Nottingham is that it's not that bad and I think the various 'worst this that or the other' stats about the place are a bit misleading.
 
Yeah, I'm sure it happens all over the place and you'd need a lot more time, expertise and interest than I have to start picking out the details. I'm really just saying that my personal experience of Nottingham is that it's not that bad and I think the various 'worst this that or the other' stats about the place are a bit misleading.

Tell me about it! :D
 
That's probably true, but it applies to a lot of cities of about Nottingham's size that are also unitary authorities. The boundaries tend to be quite tightly drawn, meaning that a) the population figures don't really reflect the city's size, and b) the more affluent areas fall outside the local authority area and don't show up in the statistics. That's certainly the case in Hull and Leicester, to name two off the top of my head.
This can be argued of Manchester to an extent. The only truly affluent areas in the City of Manchester are Chorlton, Withington and Didsbury. All the other posh places tend to be in Trafford (Sale/Altrincham), Salford (although not classed as such, e.g. Irlam, Worsley) and parts of Stockport (the Heatons, Cheadle and its environs) and Bury (Prestwich and Whitefield).
 
Back
Top Bottom