Johnny Vodka
The Abominable Scotsman
Down from 80mg to 50mg in every 100ml of blood. Good idea?
Also, more chance of getting caught unsuspectingly the next morning.
This is the main reason I'm against it.
Just wait until the new nationwide drug driving laws come in: limits on paper which no drug user will ever make sense of, just a good way to scare people into not using drugs because some can be detected in your system for days/weeks afterwards without actually having any effect.
Nah, typical Nazi-ish SNP
I'm fine with it. I'm assuming they've left it at 50mg rather than 0 to give a little bit of morning-after leeway but really, if you know you're going to be driving at 7-8am, don't drink the night before. It's not that much of a massive denial of rights
A 2010 NICE review found "strong evidence" that someone's ability to drive is affected if they have any alcohol at all in their blood.
Even those with a BAC (blood alcohol concentration) of between 0.02 (20mg per 100ml of blood) and 0.05 - people who would be within the new limit - are three times more likely to die in a vehicle crash.
So the potential new rules in Scotland aren't as strict as they could be. Sweden adopted a 20mg limit in 1990 - and the number of drink-driving accidents fell.
A 1997 study on the change showed that a 20mg limit reduced fatal crashes by 9.7%, with a 7.5% reduction in all crashes.
They also found out that the lower limit reduced crashes among drivers who were the most serious drink-driving offenders - so even drivers causing accidents who were found to be far over the limit reduced after the introduction of the ban.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-29755979
Nah, typical Nazi-ish SNP and another reason why I won't vote for them.
...
My employer has just brought in random testing with limits so low anyone taking solpadiene for a headache or a couple of doses of benydril will get caught for opiates.
Drink driving, there's no excuse for that though. Ever.
They were quite keen on trains, weren't they?I don't think requiring drivers to be pretty sober is a hallmark of Nazi-ism, really.
It's a bit of a ball ache though. It's not like 80mg is a huge amount of booze. We're talking about having a very quiet night at the pub and being over limit not a heavy session.
This is the main reason I'm against it.
So if you are over the limit "unsuspectingly the morning after" a massive booze binge, you are more able to drive than if you are equally over the limit by having a a drink or two and driving straight after?
but I really don't see the problem with having a pint of beer or a couple of small glasses of wine over a leisurely dinner or lunch, then driving.