Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Maoists in Brixton

Did you know there was a Maoist community centre in Acre Lane in the 70s, that got raided and shut down by the SPG?
Curious!
http://www.marxists.org/history/erol/uk.hightide/closure.htm

On google maps 140 Acre lane is on the corner of Solon road and Acre lane. Interesting they were not squatting but had a lease.

I do remember there used to be what I think were Maoists holding demos to support the "Shining Path" guerillas in Peru.

My Chinese friend says here parents generation do not talk about what happened during the Cultural Revolution.
 
Made me look up this image of a visiting delegation outside the Chinese embassy in 1967 (was it still Portland Place back then?):
3349978-30th-august-1967-a-chinese-delegation-outside-gettyimages.jpg

Looks like it from the doorway. Will have a look next time I cycle by.
 
Xi Jingping visited one of Mao's former residences the other day and there were a fair few 'Mao Zedong Thought lives on forever in the people's hearts' in the online comments to that I noticed.
 
On google maps 140 Acre lane is on the corner of Solon road and Acre lane. Interesting they were not squatting but had a lease.

Wasn't there some sort of Che Guevara mural on the (rounded) corner of the building. Seem to distantly recall. Surely there must be a pic somewhere?
 
i think what brixton needs is some Maoism. i might restart this organisation.

As I have Chinese friend I have read up more on recent Chinese history.

Mao attempted through mass mobilization to match the Soviet Union in development of agriculture and industry. The "Great Leap Forward". Mao thought that Soviet Union had not progressed to full communism. That China through mobilizing the masses could move to full communism in a matter of years. Maoism was born from years of hard times fighting against the Nationalist forces. When the Communists won and drove the Nationalist to Taiwan these communist were hardened revolutionaries.

The Great Leap Forward was a disaster. Not due to the authoritarian methods but the economic failings for the plan. Peasants were forced from growing crops to building useless large scale projects like dams. That were badly designed and mainly useless.

This caused widespread starvation. Mao almost lost power.

Mao was not an "emporer" but a moderniser of Chinese society. Even if he failed in many area. China is mainly secular and woman have more independence now. For better or worse Maoism left a mark on Chinese society. Even now. The Chinese communist party, still has a few survivors of Mao rule, have used capitalist methods under there control to modernise China. But there are similarities to Maoism.

My Chinese friend grew up in a city built ( her words) by her parents generation. 30 years ago it did not exist. Now its bigger than London. She said people came from all over China to build her city. They speak a form of Mandarin / Cantonese. She does not think liberal democracy will work in China. But growing inequality and the anomie her generation feel is an issue according to her.

Maoism now is not so much a modernizing ideology but a defensive one. The Maoist insurgency in India- the Naxalites- defend indigenous people against big corporations.

So mobilizing the masses to raise peoples living standards, the use of force through party cadres rather than an independent state legal system ( the rule of law) and a goal to reach for are still in our chaotic capitalist world not to be just dismissed.
 
Did you know there was a Maoist community centre in Acre Lane in the 70s, that got raided and shut down by the SPG?
Curious!
http://www.marxists.org/history/erol/uk.hightide/closure.htm

Trying to work out what Three World Theory is. Seems like it was controversial in Marxist circles. As says Soviet Union is (was) First world and imperialist power.

So put forward in 70s.



Mao Tsetung put forward the theory of three worlds. He said, “In my view, the United States and the Soviet Union form the first world. Japan, Europe and Canada, the middle section, belong to the second world.” “The third world has a huge population. With the exception of Japan, Asia belongs to the third world. The whole of Africa be-, longs to the third world, and Latin America, too.” (Chairman Mao’s talk with a third world leader, February 1974)
The first world, the two superpowers, are the biggest imperialists in the world today. Their economic strength far outweighs the other, capitalist countries; together they account for 40% of the world’s gross national product total. The contradiction between the two superpowers is sharpening to the point of another world war. The United States has the biggest empire, but the Soviet Union (a monopoly capitalist country that has betrayed the October Revolution) is driven to re-divide empires forcibly in proportion to its own immense weight among capitalist countries.
The third world makes up the vast majority of the world’s population, and its political awakening has made it a powerful force behind national liberation wars, economic struggles against the multinational corporations and political exposure of the two superpowers’ crimes against peace and humanity.
 
According to this, they were the model for the Citizen Smith and the Tooting Popular Front. They had contested the Lambeth Central by-election in April 1978 as the "South London Peoples Front" and got 38 votes. Interesting who the other candidates were, including Corin Redgrave.
 
This caused widespread starvation. Mao almost lost power ... For better or worse Maoism left a mark on Chinese society.

I'll say! Up to 45million people lost their lives through this widespread starvation. (Lowest estimate 18m, three times the Holocaust).
 
Back
Top Bottom