ska invita
back on the other side
Some teachers walked out in solidarity but it wasn't a union action
The other thing, which is minor to me but huge to X, is his 100% attendance record. If he stays at 100% he gets an award and gift at the end of the year. He really hates to have any time off and so far he has had none at all.
I would fully support the teachers striking.
I think there will not be lots of people striking - most people have to work on that day and so I think the impact will be small - probably the government don't give a shit. However, there is a sense that momentum is growing around this issue and to quote Ghandi.. 'You may never know what results come of your actions, but if you do nothing, there will be no results.' I just feel, personally, that I don't want to just let them get away with all these plans without putting up a bit of a fight.
Since the main social function of schools is to provide state-funded childcare so adults can work, it isn't realistic to expect most parents to get involved. That said this seems to have already gained lots of support given that a handful of people have organised it and provided ridiculously short notice. I can see plenty of people getting involved whose parents are unemployed, self-employed, carers, part-time workers or playground friends of any of the above (who could potentially provide some of them with childcare/playdates for the day). All of which could make for interesting conversations -like this one?- about work, education, non-paid work, taking political action... The organisers have included a sample letter on the website for parents to send in to school if they support the campaign, but aren't taking action on the day themselves, which suggests an awareness of the issues.
I'm going to keep my son at home, I hope he's not too upset about attendance. Luckily his school do attendance awards weekly for classes/termly for individuals rather than yearly so he still gets lots of certificates and non-uniform days
I think we'll probably not be in Bristol unfortunately.I'm going to talk to werv, if he wants to stay off shall we do something?
Schools aren't served penalty notices - parents/guardians are served them and not for a single day (2 session)'s absence. Also penalties are handed out for "unauthorised absences" - not sickness or other authorised reasons. So no one should be fined for Tuesday's strike unless is is the latest in a string of unauthorised absences in a specific period of time (10 or 12 weeks or so).
This is not a national policy, though.
I'm in Brighton and we do get penalty notices for single days of unauthorised absence.
Also, after direction from the council the schools here will be marking any absences tomorrow as unauthorised but most of them have stated that they will not then be issuing penalty notices - so it's very clear that most of the schools are openly supporting the action
I'm doing proper lesson plans for the day. I really don't want Elliot to see this as a skive
I got lots of this too.Did a straw poll on my FB group (all Y2 parents)- most people aren't going to get involved, no childcare mainly, followed by no belief it will do anything, followed by 'nobody else is doing it'.
However having read all the LOKBK info I'm becoming more inclined to keep werv off.
Oh gosh no, I didn't mean that at all! You're a proper teacher and know what you're doing. I don't so I've got some help from TESGood luck. I know you didn't mean it to sound this way, but I'd like to point out, in case anyone has that impression, that O will not be skiving. I'm not going to bore everyone with detailed plans from us, but rest-assured she will definitely be learning!
I spend hours and hours making lesson plans, writing schemes of work etc and don't feel they are necessarily a guarantee of learning taking place, nor the absence of them a barrier to learning. So she won't be hearing the lesson objectives as the start, or starters, plenaries, pit-stops, extension work, literacy, numeracy and other myriad things that we are expected to cram into a lesson plan. Things that change regularly depending on the current whim of oftentimes non-educationalist leaders with no evidence to support their ideas. (this rant is not directed at you but a wider rant about current trends in education - I can absolutely bet that Elliot is going to have a fantastic day with you learning loads).
Oh gosh no, I didn't mean that at all! You're a proper teacher and know what you're doing. I don't so I've got some help from TES
We're going to do some drama/imaginative stuff about the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (and a bit of reading comprehension because I have to do some work in the morning) and then we're going to talk about marine foodchains and make a mobile using stuff we find on the beach
I'm quite looking forward to it
The four sessions seems to relate to 'poor attendance' - but for eg taking a single day off for a holiday will incur a fine at at least some of the schools here.
ETA - Had only responded to your original post there cos it was a reply to Mr.Bishie who'd been talking specifically about Brighton schools, iyswim!
It's all in how it's logged tbh. There's a difference (as you will see on the council site) in authorised/unauthorised/holiday/medical etc. If you call and say you're keeping your child off school to go on holiday and the school hasn't authorised that, then the council site could be read to mean you'll get a fine for a single day. Again, I would, personally, contest that. Actually I wouldn't say we were on holiday if it were a single day anyway! There have been a few cases recently of parents fighting their ground in court over this and the courts have come down on the parents' side.
Schools also have the option to log it as "educated offsite" - which many schools do now when they exclude students but don't want the exclusion to show up in their attendance record. Some festivals will provide on-site schools so that parents can bring childen to the festival but also provide SOW and lesson plans to show that their children have been learning.
As I say - it's all murky water.
So, as you say, I think very few schools will be likely to log children as "unauthorised absence" in this case. However, as is now becoming my mantra - Talk to the school first!
We're just going to skive.
My daughter's school has a rigid policy of recording ALL holidays during term time as unauthorised (whether you formally request it or not) and fining for them, too.
Personally, next time I do it I will just lie - but that seems ridiculous in itself, eh - wtf do they expect is going to happen?!
The fact teachers unions didn't flinch over uni fees , both in 2010 and when labour brought them in makes me feel the chances of them acting over anything other than pay is highly unlikely.
As far as I know most, if not all schools, will mark holidays during term time as unauthorised - because they won't/can't authorise them. Certainly in my time teaching there has been a massive change towards that. I teach many children whose parents request long periods off to take them back to their parents' home country - usually the Carribean or similarly long-haul. They used to be allowed to go when I first started teaching but not anymore. When it comes to short periods off most people lie - or I have heard that some people work out that the amount they will pay in fines is offset by the savings they make by taking the holiday during term time.
I was very honest with my daughter's school about a one day absence being due to going away on the Friday. I spoke to a senior member of staff (I'm a bad liar) and he told me to call in sick.
I know one of them! Blue glasses who calls it "very bizarre"This is terrifying: