Allegedly, surely?Dan U said:a pregnant black woman who tried to observe the police arresting another black man was herself arrested.
I think you'll find that very word is used in the post you criticise.AnnO'Neemus said:Allegedly, surely?
Dan U said:in short she was allegedly rushed by two officers .
See post above for my explanation as to why I made the distinction and my reasons for making that post.Donna Ferentes said:I think you'll find that very word is used in the post you criticise.
A leaflet has been distributed in Brixton Town Centre yesterday, carrying serious allegations of the conduct of police in making an arrest. The CPCG has been in contact with the police, who have given us the following statement.
The police are collating the full circumstances of the arrest and the CPCG has asked to be kept informed
Police Statement
On Thursday 27th October 2005 at approx 6.30pm uniformed police officers from Brixton were effecting the arrest of a male suspected of supplying drugs in Brixton Road near Iceland. During the arrest a female approached the arresting officers and was subsequently arrested for public order offences and assaulting 2 police officers.
She was restrained with handcuffs and placed in a police van. She was initially taken to Peckham police station but then taken to Hospital. She informed police that she was pregnant and may be miscarrying. She was examined by hospital staff and found not to be pregnant nor suffering any injury. She was then taken to Brixton police station.
She has been bailed pending further investigations by police. The incident was witnessed by a large crowd that had gathered and partially captured on CCTV. Circumstances surrounding her arrest are currently being investigated.
AnnO'Neemus said:Yeah, I'm being legalistically pedantic, but then I have a legal background.
In the first sentence, you said that she had been arrested; it was made as a statement of fact.
What you 'alleged' was apparently the manner in which she was detained, not whether or not she had been arrested.
I did read the whole post, but I wasn't jumping in in haste, I was responding carefully having paid attention to detail, just pointing out that from a legalistic point of view, you're making (a) a statement of fact and (b) an allegation, when perhaps both (a) and (b) should be allegations. Hope that clears it up.
I had a look at blackbases.com and the following caught my eye:Dan U said:the email on the leaflet if you have info is editor@blackbases.com
What utter shite! (and it gets worse and worse further on)Melanin - What is melanin?
Melanin is an important key to human survival. It is a blessing and can never be a curse. The truth about melanin is up to now a closely kept secret, for Melanin is blackness itself.
That is to say, the single chemical responsible for colouring the skin pigments in black people. Melanin is the human's only protection from the natural rays of the sun. It also possesses the unique ability to absorb various energy sources and convert these absorbed energies into reusable energy, this includes mediums such as; Music vibration and sound waves, the sun rays, sun heat, light rays etc.
Melanin gives Black people superior physical, mental and spiritual ability.
Melanin refines the nervous system in such a way that messages from the brain reach other areas of the body most rapidly in Black people, the Original People. Black infants sit, stand, crawl, walk and can be toilet trained (at six months old) sooner than their counterparts, and demonstrate more advanced cognitive skills than their counterparts because of their abundance of Melanin.
The abundance of Melanin in black humans produces a superior organism physically, mentally and spiritually. This is why all the founders of the world's great religions are Black. Melanin is the neuro-chemical basis for what is called SOUL in Black people...
TeeJay said:I had a look at blackbases.com and the following caught my eye:
What utter shite!
I think that *anyone* trying to stir up racial conflict should be treated just like the BNP would be - ie told to fuck off.
Is BlackBASES racist?
BlackBASES believe in Black Power, Black Freedom, Black Elevation, Black Unity, Black Strength, Black Love, all things that our communities around the world are lacking. You tell us, does this make us racists?
TeeJay said:What I hate is how any kind of radicalism or "black" (ie african/culturally-black) thinking seems to include nasty and nonsensical racial ideas and bigotry that is almost like a mirror image of white racism/racial ideas and bigotry. You often find sexist, homophobic, anti-abortion, reactionary, conservative, right-wing wanna-be patriarch spouting a load of fake african "motherland" stuff almost deliberately to make sure no "whites" or "liberals" (aka "wanna-be whites") turn up and challenge their ego-trip.
TeeJay said:You also write it like this:
Is RaceBASES racist?
RaceBASES believe in Racial Power, Racial Freedom, Racial Elevation, Racial Unity, Racial Strength, Racial Love, all things that our racial communities around the world are lacking. You tell us, does this make us racists?
It doesn't really matter about what "colour" you substitute. The problem is the false proposition that separate and distinct "races" exist allied to the idea that people naturally "belong" to one "race" group or another and that these supposed 'groups' have different rights and values.
Even the mainstream media in the UK keeping talking about "whites", "blacks" and "asians" - as if "race" was a meangingful and real way of dividing up and classifying human beings. It isn't.
Dan U said:we are all, it would seem, in agreement...