Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Establishment networking, sleaze and corruption. A handy compendium.

Good old Ms Sultana still saying as it is.

251475930_615920793178841_8272512171730431469_n.png
 


Actually 27 including my MP who I have mailed asking for an explanation.

It’s pairing conventions. Lots of MPs are in COP26 and Select Committee excursions, so are paired with opposite numbers in the other party, cancelling out how each other would have voted.

It’s why they need to bring in proxy votes, or digital votes if absent. Another hangover of an outdated system.
 
something like this would have called for a three-line whip?
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has backed the amendment, and Tory MPs have been issued with a three-line whip on voiting in its favour, a move that has caused disquiet among some Conservative MPs.
 
Pairing isn't generally allowed during a three-line whip, though?
They do it for all votes as far as i’m aware, but sometimes have a strop and suspend it for periods. The Labour MPs that abstained today have all (or mostly) come out and explained that they were paired and in most cases the reason why (e.g. my MP, Alex Davies-Jones was on a Select Committee visit).
 
lol.


Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg has now confirmed the changes will not go ahead without cross-party support.
He told the Commons there was a "strong feeling" that any change to the standards process "should not be based on a single case", and Wednesday's vote had "conflated" the two.
"This link needs to be broken" added Mr Rees-Mogg.
He said the government would come back to MPs with more detailed proposals to change the system after it had held discussions with the other parties.
And it is also understood another vote will take place on whether Mr Paterson should be suspended.
 
lol.

Having done what must be about the worst thing, reputationally, that they could have done by even holding yesterday's vote, it seems to me that they have immediately relegated that to the second worst thing, reputationally, that they could have done, by backing away from their brazen attempt to sleaze their way out of this.

We are governed by fools.
 
Having done what must be about the worst thing, reputationally, that they could have done by even holding yesterday's vote, it seems to me that they have immediately relegated that to the second worst thing, reputationally, that they could have done, by backing away from their brazen attempt to sleaze their way out of this.

We are governed by fools.
Knaves and fools
 
Back
Top Bottom