ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I want my next camera to produce files that are acceptable to the picture houses. I suppose I will have to do some digging to find out what that actually means.
Probably large pixel count jpegs or RAW.
I want my next camera to produce files that are acceptable to the picture houses. I suppose I will have to do some digging to find out what that actually means.
Yes, something like that. A chap the other night said some actually have a list of cameras and if yours isn't on the list your submissions are rejected. I don't really know why I am interested in this because I don't take that many suitable images and I believe they don't pay very much but given the choice I would like to know if my camera were suitable.Probably large pixel count jpegs or RAW.
Yes, something like that. A chap the other night said some actually have a list of cameras and if yours isn't on the list your submissions are rejected. I don't really know why I am interested in this because I don't take that many suitable images and I believe they don't pay very much but given the choice I would like to know if my camera were suitable.
I want this:
[...]
Thanks!
Yes, there are many interesting used choices at the moment.You can get a nice low-mileage D700 for a bit over £500 if you look around.
They're still quite good and I'm not the only one who thinks so see e.g.
The Online Photographer: Our Favorite Cameras
I can print up to A3 with mine no problem, as long as I've been meticulous in shooting.
Unless you're doing serious landscape stuff with or take pictures of food for a living or something I can't see much point in the D8xx cameras.
If I was going to get something else it'd be something smaller and lighter like one of the mft or Fuji cameras. I may very well switch to Fuji X when my D700 eventually dies.