ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Today I saw an Olympus OM-D (an EM-1, I believe) for the first time, and there was definitely a bit of lust at first sight going on. So small but perfectly-formed!
Today I saw an Olympus OM-D (an EM-1, I believe) for the first time, and there was definitely a bit of lust at first sight going on. So small but perfectly-formed!
It looks good, but £550 street price makes it a bit on the expensive side compared to this which you can get for under £300.I'm being intrigued by this:
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/compacts/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-rx100-iii-review
But look at the lens! And the sensor!It looks good, but £550 street price makes it a bit on the expensive side compared to this which you can get for under £300.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Panasonic-DMC-TZ70EB-K-Compact-Digital-Camera/dp/B00S9BD108/
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/compacts/panasonic-lumix-dmc-tz70-review
You mean the Lumix 'only' has 12MP? So what. The Sony just has the edge on dynamic range, but there's not a lot in it. And why is the lens a problem? 24–720mm equivalent as opposed to 24–70mm on the Sony. I know which one I'd get.But look at the lens! And the sensor!
I would like both of those but they are out of my reach financially atm (shame)Nikon D750 plus an AFS 70-200 2.8 VR II
Hopefully will have both by Xmas if work continues to be good...
A fast f1.8 aperture makes things a lot, lot more useful for a compact camera with a small sensor.You mean the Lumix 'only' has 12MP? So what. The Sony just has the edge on dynamic range, but there's not a lot in it. And why is the lens a problem? 24–720mm equivalent as opposed to 24–70mm on the Sony. I know which one I'd get.
I'd like a tilt-shift lens. It'd be a complete luxury purchase, so... we'll see.
After a recent volunteer trip thing on a safari reserve in South Africa, I've bit the photography bullet. An insurance cheque regarding a stolen bike has funded....
Nikon D750
Nikon 28-300 lens
Tamron 150-300 lens
and a 50mm prime.
Hope to make an appearance in the photo threads sometime soon
Any particular reason you chose two lenses with the same max focal length Ted?
Oh, no, just a typo, it's 150-600...
24.2 MP Full-Frame CMOS Sensor
- Leica Maestro II Image Processor
- Leica Summilux 28mm f/1.7 ASPH Lens
- 3.68 MP LCOS Electronic Viewfinder
- 3.0" 1,040k-Dot Touchscreen LCD Monitor
- Contrast-Detect AF System
- Full HD 1080p Video at up to 60 fps
- ISO 50,000 & 10 fps Continuous Shooting
- Aluminum & Magnesium Alloy Body Design
- Built-In Wi-Fi Connectivity with NFC
Read the reviews and then maybe rethink the 'hipster' jibe:What proportion of a Leica megaprice is hipster tax and how much is genuine technical value/innovation?
Leica cameras are known for being out of this world. Not just for their no-nonsense build and super-sharp picture quality, but astronomical pricing too. The Leica Q encompasses all of those things and yet despite its near-£3k price tag it's still an incredible camera, certainly the best full-frame fixed-lens compact ever made.
That bold statement does need some context though: the Q hardly has similar competitors snapping at its heels, with only the Sony RX1 or, on a smaller sensor basis, the Fujifilm X100T in contention. But even within this small specialist circle the Leica Q is king because its capacity for exceptional imaging thanks to that super-sharp optic is unparalleled (ignoring the standard JPEG contrast settings anyway).
Sure, it's not a mass market product, as is the case with any fixed-lens camera. But whether you're a staunch Leica fan, or simply a photography fan, the Q is that rare Leica that will transcend users old and new thanks to its combination of classic and modern features. A rare yet wonderful thing indeed.