editor
hiraethified
Many newspapers are guilty of posting up some shockingly inaccurate material, and the freedom of blogs that aren't influenced by commercial constraints can lead to some excellent journalism being produced. The stuff Tricky Skills posts on Buzz is a very good example - I don't see many other media outlets holding Lambeth to account.Because, effectively, they are interchangeable disciplines, even down to the sad fact of not getting paid for what you write.
There's no difference between the content of the opinion piece leanderman posted up in post #594 from the Standard, and most blogging and reportage about Brixton by Brixtonites ("nu" and old). The only real difference is that one relies on the publishing of a physical artefact in order to be distributed, while the other relies on electronic means. The rest of it (circulation, advertising) is reputational, and to do with having an "established" brand.
Besides, it's almost impossible not to express an opinion or a bias of some sort when you're reporting on something, because everyone sees things differently, and I prefer a writer to have an opinion and some passion rather that someone regurgitating and reshuffling a press release. And, of course, if someone doesn't like the angle a blog takes, the solution is simple: either add your own comments to the story or, even better, get off your arse and start your own.