I've taken a look at the proposal for 85 Brixton Hill. The design follows the massing and front elevation of the neighbouring terrace exactly - the same facade height, roofline and rear extension.
View attachment 15785
It has 6 floors instead of the 5 of the adjoining 6 - as shown in this section:
View attachment 15786
They've crammed
eight flats into it . A 1-bed and a studio in the basement. A 2-bed on the ground floor. Then 1-beds on the upper floors. They're pokey as hell, but given that the previous application got
nine in the same envelope, this is an improvement.
That previous application was turned down because it was a)Seriously pokey b)Built on Rush Common land (a cycle storage shed) and c)Didn't look like its neighbouring building
b) and c) have been addressed in this application (the proposal now matches materials, finish and window arrangment on the main facades, the cycle storage is now fenced rather than built up)
a) has been partly addressed, by the reduction in number of flats and by the provision of a rather grim-looking open-air "amenity" space in the middle of the building on the top floor.
I'm currently checking flat sizes and provision against the UDP, as this is the only realistic way of opposing the development now. If they just matched the existing floor-to-floor heights and made it 5 flats, then they'd be humanely sized and it would sail through planning. Greedy fuckers.