Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Black Lives Matter vs Bernie Sanders

J Ed

Follow Back Pro Expropriation
This whole bust up is really bizarre, and a lot of people seem to be wondering whether it has been orchestrated by the Clinton campaign.

http://www.vox.com/2015/7/20/9001639/bernie-sanders-black-lives-matter

Two Democratic candidates appeared at Netroots Nation on Saturday: Sanders and Martin O'Malley. (Hillary Clinton was invited, but declined the invitation.) O'Malley and Sanders made back-to-back appearances in a town hall–style session, moderated by journalist and immigration activist Jose Antonio Vargas.

Both Sanders and O'Malley are trying to win progressive support in the Democratic primary to become the alternative to Hillary Clinton. But only one of them has really succeeded: Sanders's candidacy has gained a lot of momentum, with huge events and the second-most money raised directly of any candidate (driven largely by small donations). O'Malley, on the other hand, hasn't been able to capture as much attention. In fact, he's faced something of an uphill battle with many progressives: O'Malley's political career started in Baltimore, where he was closely associated with the aggressive police tactics that were under protest after the death of Freddie Gray in police custody this spring.

Shortly after O'Malley took the stage, a group of protesters affiliated with the #BlackLivesMatter movement (which has been organizing for the last year or so to call attention to deaths of black men and women at the hands of police) marched into the room chanting "Which Side Are You On?" (a reference to an old-school labor song). Two women (Tia Oso and Patrisse Cullors) took the stage and the microphone and spoke about deaths of black men and women in police custody — specifically the recent suspicious death of Sandra Bland in Texas.

Ending the presentation, Cullors asked O'Malley to offer "concrete actions": "What will you do to stop police unions from battering our names after law enforcement kills us?" "And," she added, "we want to hear it from Bernie Sanders, too."

...

Sanders was defensive and cranky toward the protesters, saying "Black lives of course matter. But I've spent 50 years of my life fighting for civil rights. If you don't want me to be here, that's okay." At other times, he didn't acknowledge the protesters at all and raised his voice to be heard over them (which some attendees saw as Sanders "shouting down" the protesters).

Sanders didn't ignore the issue entirely. But to some observers, it felt like Sanders "stuck to his script" about economic injustice without giving racial injustice its due.

There is a legitimate disconnect between the way Sanders (and many of the economic progressives who support him) see the world, and the way many racial justice progressives see the world. To Bernie Sanders, as I've written, racial inequality is a symptom — but economic inequality is the disease. That's why his responses to unrest in Ferguson and Baltimore have included specific calls for police accountability, but have focused on improving economic opportunity for young African Americans. Sanders presents fixing unemployment as the systemic solution to the problem.

...

Whether you agree with Sanders's claim that he's been "fighting for civil rights for 50 years" depends on whether you think he's doing enough in his Senate career to put civil rights on the agenda. But the "50 years" part is true: He has admirable civil rights movement cred. Sanders was a member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, which helped coordinate much of the nonviolent action of the early 1960s, and he participated in the famous March for Jobs and Freedom in 1963, where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered the famous "I Have a Dream" speech.

Today, Sanders's supporters bring up his record in the civil rights movement in response to basically any criticism of his actions on racial equality. And when Sanders started catching criticism for his Netroots performance, the supporters were ready with their history. As comedy podcaster Roderick Morrow — who started the satirical #BernieSoBlack Twitter hashtag on Sunday — told Vox: "It seems like any time black people bring this up on Twitter, there's just all these people who, I don't know if they're just sitting around searching his name on Twitter or something, they just come and get in your mentions and start harassing you, saying the same things over and over to you."

But the civil rights movement references aren't actually an answer to his critics. No one is arguing that Sanders literally doesn't see race, they're saying that Sanders sees racial inequality as less important than economic inequality and shouldn't.

So racial inequality and economic inequality are separate? What?

Meanwhile...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-clinton-said-it-black-lives-matter-no-hedge/

"Black lives matter." With those three little words, Clinton acknowledged that there are myriad ways that race continues to shape life in America that have almost no relationship to pocketbooks, educational credentials or class. There's ample evidence that income, education and the like do not deliver the same results in black lives that they do in others.

It almost seems as if the problem for a lot of people in regards to Sanders is that while Sanders frames white supremacy within its historical and economic context, Hillary is more than willing to simply parrot a meme and provide no actual answers or context or any indication that she will back any kind of policy to fight against white supremacy or police brutality beyond mouthing the right platitude. Her support for her husband's racist welfare and crime bills, coups against democratically elected 'business non-compliant' regimes... all forgotten.
 
Loads of comment today online about the hijacking of the hashtag #Blacklivesmatter to #Alllivesmatter, well of course they do but the hijack is a distraction from the real and present issues under discussion.

Yes, I agree completely with that. It's the race equivalent of #notallmen

Interestingly, Hillary Clinton said it about a month ago which makes the fact that these activists are going after Sanders rather than Clinton even weirder. Is this a consequences of just how fucking bizarre identity politics are getting or are they being directed in some way by Clinton's campaign?
 
I recon the way race can cut across class boundries is one of the more naked examples of extant racism here, the US or anywhere. In that even if you might be the scion of a wealthy black US family, uncle running for senator and so on. The minute you get a traffic stop in a certain place by a certain stripe of copper- you are fucked.
 
I recon the way race can cut across class boundries is one of the more naked examples of extant racism here, the US or anywhere. In that even if you might be the scion of a wealthy black US family, uncle running for senator and so on. The minute you get a traffic stop in a certain place by a certain stripe of copper- you are fucked.

Agree with this definitely, especially when I think of openly racist lads I know from school that went on to join the police. Bernie Sanders has also said things in the past that were dodgy about gun ownerships and race but nothing that really justifies the amount of vitriol aimed at him while Clinton gets nothing at all.
 
This particular dispute is a storm in a teacup.

But there's no doubt that identity politics has been used as a distraction from anti-capitalism, with conspicuous success. It's also been used to justify American foreign policy: "we have to invade/bomb/destroy various Muslim countries because they're so nasty to women/gays/minorities." A remarkable number of people fall for it.
 
http://www.blackagendareport.com/netroots-nation-confrontation

The first thing to know about the #BlackLivesMatter confrontation with Democratic presidential candidates Martin O'Malley and Bernie Sanders is that it didn't happen on the street or some neutral setting, it didn't happen at some random campaign appearance. It happened at the annual NetRootsNation gathering, this year in Phoenix.

NetRoots bills itself as “the largest gathering of the progressive movement” in this country. Unless you think the Democratic party IS the progressive movement, or that all “progressives” are Democrats, this is nonsense. I know, I've been to NetRoots.

What it actually is, is the largest gathering of paid and wannabe paid Democratic party activists, Democratic candidates and Democratic campaign managers, of consultants and vendors to Democratic campaigns, and folks of all kinds who are part of the far-flung partisan and ostensibly “non-partisan” machinery that gears up every even numbered year to elect Democrats to local, state and national office. Some of them want to change the Democratic party from within, some of them want to take it as it is, but they're all committed to staying inside the Democratic tent, and to keeping you there as well.

If you're a black Democratic party activist like I was for 25 years, even if like me, you never called yourself that, you go to NetRoots to connect with other Democratic party activists, and hopefully, with the people who will be handing out grassroots money, among other things, to get out the Big Black Vote in November, without which Democrats on every level have no hope of winning.

High ranking Democrats who hand out money, whether through partisan campaigns or to ostensibly nonpartisan and/or nonprofit organizations are always on the lookout for new activist blood with catchy new hooks, for activists who'll say the things they will not say in the effort to turn out the black masses for that Big Black Vote. So if you're a black activist at NetRoots you really NEED to stand out, to get noticed by the people who can give you fellowships, grants, jobs, funding of all kinds, and a career.

Since Hillary is the all but inevitable Democratic nominee, confronting two minor white male candidates, demanding they “say her name” and come up with solutions that address white supremacy, structural racism and the runaway police state is pretty much a foolproof strategy to get noticed, and as Hillary did not attend NetRoots, they got to do it without antagonizing the Clinton camp. Hillary wisely covered her own ass by releasing a tweet that unequivocally said “black lives DO matter.”

But all in all, the NetRootsNation confrontation wasn't the stirring of black women activists “taking their rightful place at the front of the progressive movement,” as one breathless tweet called it. It didn't tell us anything we didn't know about O'Malley or Sanders, or about hypocritical Hillary.

It was about flying the #BlackLivesMatter flag to jockey for positions inside the machinery that is the Democratic party and its affiliates.
 
http://blackagendareport.com/node/4624

If #BlackLivesMatter is a movement, just what does that mean? Obama's 2008 campaign said it was “the movement” too. If modern movements are indistinguishable from brands, to whom are they responsible besides “creators” and marketers? Are some #BlackLivesMatter leaders angling for spots in what Adolph Reed calls the race management elite? Could this be why #BlackLivesMatter has no critique of the black misleadership class, or of capitalism?


So what exactly is the BlackLivesMatter movement? It's a hashtag certainly, and it's a brand, likely trademarked by now. OpalTometti, one of its co-creators says it's “a strategic response to combat white supremacy.” But what does that really mean? How would we ever know if we actually beat white supremacy?

Some better questions are whether #BlackLivesMatter is really anything like a peoples movement aimed at changing society and lives for the better, or is it the private vehicle of its co-creators who get to take it where they decide to go? To whom are #BlackLivesMatter's leaders accountable, and just where are they taking their “movement”? Barack Obama's 2008 campaign marketed itself as “the movement” too.

Why doesn't the #BlackLivesMatter movement, supposedly focused upon the unique needs of people of color, have any critique of the black political class, almost all Democrats, who have been key stakeholders in the building of the prison state, in gentrification and school privatization from New Orleans to Detroit and beyond, and who helped peddle the subprime mortgages to black families which exploded and cut black family wealth by nine-tenths? Have they even noticed that a black president has closed and privatized more public schools than any other in US history? For all the big words they use, do they ever mention the word “capitalism”?

There are ominous signs. Last month folks whom Alicia Garza described as “part of our team” disrupted two minor white male candidates at NetRootsNation, the annual networking event for paid and wannabe paid Democratic party activists, embarrassing them with demands over structural racism and “say her name”. If they were positioning themselves for careers inside the far-flung Democratic party apparatus, it was a smart move, because Hillary wasn't there. Hence they got noticed in that crowd of Democrat operatives without antagonizing the people with the real money and connections.
 
A couple of Black lives matter wackos shut down a Bernie Sanders rally in Seattle calling Seattle residents racists. A few BLM people are showing themselves to be thugs & racists. They should have been cuffed & jailed.
Activists with Black Lives Matter protests halted a political rally in Seattle where Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders was scheduled to speak on Saturday afternoon.

“We’re shutting this event down — now,” said an activist who suddenly leapt on stage. She approached the microphone where Sanders had just begun speaking, thanking attendees for welcoming him to “one of most progressive cities in the United States of America.” An event organizer attempted to stop the activist, and a heated exchange ensued as the crowd booed.

Eventually, activist Marissa Johnson was allowed to speak. “I was going to tell Bernie how racist this city is, even with all of these progressives, but you’ve already done that for me. Thank you,” she said as some in the crowd called for her arrest.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-event-shut-down-black-lives-matter-activists
 
A couple of Black lives matter wackos shut down a Bernie Sanders rally in Seattle calling Seattle residents racists. A few BLM people are showing themselves to be thugs & racists. They should have been cuffed & jailed.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-event-shut-down-black-lives-matter-activists

I think it's becoming increasingly obvious that there are more than a few people working for Clinton who are shielding themselves with the #BLM flag

The problem with organising around a hashtag is that absolutely anyone can join in with no accountability whatsoever. During COINTELPRO the state actually had to do a bit of leg work to infiltrate groups that the state objected to, now they just have to mouth a few platitudes and type out a hashtag and of course the same applies to any other organisation or group.
 
Although Hillary is very ambitious & ruthless, I doubt she's behind the BLM incidents. It's likely the result of Hillary having Secret Service protection from being "first lady." Bernie apparently has little or no security so he's a soft target for a few supposedly BLM people who want to turn a once legitimate protest to their own ends.

There's also the rumor that Bill Clinton put Trump up to running for pres in a phone call right before Trump's announcement, to screw the Repubs. And in return Bill promised him a cabinet position or ambassadorship. This seems like right wing conspiraloonery.
 
https://www.facebook.com/doug.henwood/posts/10153112188706475

[Posted to Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor's page.]
Guenevere Nyderek A copy of something posted today on a site I'm involved with, regarding the BS/BLM kerfuffle, and those involved: ||> Alexandrina Braun After reading thousands of comments in the past day, I totally agree with you. The game has changed. The jig is up.
29 mins · Like · 1
Alexandrina Braun I have a comrade super active in Seattle. She has shared a ton backstory in a private group. I'm gonna share her comments here...
26 mins · Like · 1
Alexandrina Braun 1) Soooooooooo, first thing to know is that Marissa Jenae (Johnson) was a Palin supporter, came into left liberation organizing around Nov. 2014 and immediately allied with Mara Willaford. Mara usually claims to be an only child, choosing not to admit to the existence of her disabled brother for unknown reasons. Her father retired from the Air Force as a Colonel, got appropriate Homeland Security certifications, and went to work at Boeing. He's worked on Posideon, among other things. Mara never disclosed that she was living with someone who was actively involved with HS and the military who had access to her belongings. She engaged with BlocktheBoat during the attempts in 2014 to stop Zim ships from entering port in Tacoma and Seattle, then moved to black liberation organizing in Nov. 2014.
25 mins · Unlike · 2
Alexandrina Braun 2) The two quickly took a central position as folks that met through the Mike Brown protests and others who have been organizing for various numbers of years came together to form what was eventually called Outside Agitators 206. They chose meeting spaces, facilitated, and were a key voice in deciding where energy was to be focused. They initially pushed against the idea of a black only meeting once a week to pair with a general meeting.
25 mins · Unlike · 2
Alexandrina Braun 3) Very quickly, internal conflicts, of the type we're all well aquainted with began to surface. It was not, however, entirely clear how much of that conflict originated with the M's. Eventually, though, many destructive rumors and other causes of friction were traced back to them. They snitchjacketed several people, including folks that were arrested at actions and were facing charges. They accused multiple people of assault, sometimes at times or under circumstances that were provably false. They loudly proclaimed other people to be lazy while complaining about how overloaded and burn out they were, then shifting their work onto other organizers because of the burn out. And then they went on a campaign against a well respected long time organizer, accusing her of harrassment and abuse, possibly sexual abuse.
25 mins · Unlike · 2
Alexandrina Braun 4) It was largely due to their actions that OA 206 ceased to meet. And let's be clear, it's dead. Mara and Marissa both have access to the OA206 FB page, and one of their friends is posting to the otherwise defunct website. That's it. There is no actual group behind that, and in December the site will cease to exist when its one year of free hosting runs out. I could turn it off right now, but that would just be an asshole move. OA206 was considering filing to become a Black Lives Matter affiliate, which is why the group had Mara and Marissa reach out to the national organization. OA206 did fundraising to send the two of them, along with a couple of other folks, to Detroit for a major conference. Instead of representing the people that sent them, they did a lot of personal politicking.
24 mins · Unlike · 2
Alexandrina Braun 5) This new BLM group that just created a FB page, is, in fact, a legitimate BLM group in that it is led by the folks from Seattle recognized by the national BLM organization. It's maybe ten people, most of whom are white. It's vastly outnumbered by folks that are working through other avenues, like the kids that put on that Check Your Privilege Party in the middle of UW's frat row.
24 mins · Unlike · 2
Alexandrina Braun 6) As far as this action goes, it was designed for maximum confrontation. These folks could have been part of that program, could have disrupted it in a more chorographed way, could have used friendly folks on the security team to make sure that the risk of violence was way lower (one lady got bit and several others hit before security could protect them, just for holding banners), could have made their point and ceded the stage. There was not going to be any compromise. Any demand that was met was followed with a bigger demand because there was never any intention of letting Sanders speak. I do not know why they made that choice. I do know that a lot of folks here in Seattle support white liberal racism being put on blast, will not speak against the action for that reason, but are SUPER uncomfortable with Mara and Marissa as the faces of Seattle BLM.
23 mins · Unlike · 2
Alexandrina Braun 7) They're bullies and they weaponize anti-oppressive language to silence anyone who has any critique of their behavior. Oh, and they may be trying to fuck with the internal politics of the Seattle NAACP (which are absolutely Byzantine) for reasons I do not understand. So there's that too.
23 mins · Like · 1[/qutoe]
 
Although Hillary is very ambitious & ruthless, I doubt she's behind the BLM incidents. It's likely the result of Hillary having Secret Service protection from being "first lady." Bernie apparently has little or no security so he's a soft target for a few supposedly BLM people who want to turn a once legitimate protest to their own ends.

And if they tried it with the Republicans they'd get tazed, bro.

 
A couple of Black lives matter wackos shut down a Bernie Sanders rally in Seattle calling Seattle residents racists. A few BLM people are showing themselves to be thugs & racists. They should have been cuffed & jailed.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bernie-sanders-event-shut-down-black-lives-matter-activists

It wasn't a Bernie Sanders rally. It was a rally for the 50th anniversary of Medicare. Bernie was just one of many speakers. Funny how the news neglected to mention it was a major anniversary of Medicare. It's almost as if they don't want anyone to know that single-payer systems work.
 
Last edited:
Compare the tone here

http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/11/politics/hillary-clinton-new-hampshire-black-lives-matter-2016/

Keene, New Hampshire (CNN)Hillary Clinton met with five #BlackLivesMatter members on Tuesday in New Hampshire after the group was not allowed into the presidential candidate's forum on substance abuse.

After her event here, Clinton met with the group for 15 minutes, according to Daunasia Yancey, founder of #BlackLivesMatter in Boston. Yancey said that the group felt the meeting was positive, but still has more questions for Clinton on her family's role in mass incarceration and drug policy.

"We did have a couple of particular questions that we wanted to ask her, and we were able to do so, and she was able to respond," Yancey told a handful of reporters after the meeting. "We asked the secretary about her and her family's history with the war on drugs both at home and abroad and how she felt about her involvement in that violence that has been perpetuated, especially against communities of color and against black folks."



...

"She did acknowledge that there are policies that she has been a part of promoting that have not worked," Yancey added, but said that Clinton's response was a "political" one.

"I am sure she understands. She is a brilliant woman," she said. "I think she gave the answer she wanted to give."

"She got something out of the meeting. That much is certain," he said. "I feel like what we got out of the meeting was to actually press her in a very real way -- probably in a way that she hasn't been pressed in a long time about not only her role as a presidential candidate, but her role as first lady, senator and secretary of state."

Jones added, "What it seemed like was, and what she did say was that, she would want to take more the angle of changing more systemic things and looking for and wanting policy reforms that were palatable that she could package and sell. Right? But as far as the arena of the heart, she was not willing to go there."

Bit different to the accusations of racism and #bowdownburnie etc, isn't it? They even started an equally vacuous, but much 'kinder' hashtag #holluphillary
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-black-lives-matter_55cbbfebe4b064d5910a6f0b

WASHINGTON -- Activists DeRay Mckesson and Brittany Packnett recently spoke with Hillary Clinton’s policy director and others in the Clinton camp about police reform, criminal justice and other issues of importance to the black community, several people familiar with the chat told The Huffington Post.

The conversation took place about two weeks ago, sources said, and included at least one other figure from the Black Lives Matter movement besides Mckesson and Packnett. Over the past year, Mckesson -- a former teacher and school administrator in Minneapolis -- has become one of the most visible Black Lives Matter activists and has documented protests across the country. Packnett, a Teach For America executive and former congressional staffer, is a member of both the Ferguson Commission in Missouri and President Barack Obama's Task Force on 21st Century Policing.

Hmmm
 
Thanks for the recommendation from butchersapron for these links


Dear #BlackLivesMatter: We Don’t Need Black Leadership

At multiple turns, the fact that queer Black women started the Black Lives Matter hashtag has been a major point of emphasis. However, making certain Black people, even if they’re queer and/or women, the face of a new Black leadership class will not save Black people. The problem with the Black leadership class of old isn’t that it was male, it’s that it was elite and used to control the masses. The same dynamics are in play today; just look at who was left behind following the Ferguson unrest. As Sarah Kendzior comments, “The average Ferguson protester is often struggling to get by… a lot of those people who were living in poverty on August 9th are still living in poverty; some more so, because they gave up hourly wages and other things to become part of the protest movement.”

The latest effort to storm Bernie Sanders’ appearances is only making the problem more obvious. The two women that interrupted Sanders last weekend seemingly did so unilaterally. You can’t build real mass political power that way, but building effective power is not their point. Make no mistake, this Bernie Sanders hoopla is ultimately about campaign jobs and foundation funding, not emancipation for the masses. These interruptions will create career opportunities for a few activists and political operatives—the Black leadership desired by Tia and others—but, as with Ferguson, the masses of Black people will be unaffected.

You might call this trickle down racial justice, and it’s deeply cynical. Each time a Black person dies at the hands of the police, for many opportunists, it’s just another news cycle to dominate, one more chance to get some cable TV airtime and web clicks. What’s worse, the people who suffer most are the people on the ground, the Black poor, who have been used as cannon fodder for the cultural and political ascendency of a privileged few.

Interview with the author of this piece on Doug Henwood's prog here
 
I have been looking a bit at Teach for America following the intervention by a TFA executive in the Black Lives Matter movement and I think that it might be worth looking into how much of a role this deeply reactionary elite intervention in education in America has to do with intersecting (heh) of neoliberal politics with liberal identity politics. At least some TFAers seem to speak the language of liberal identity politics and corporate promotional material on their website uses it. Heres another about race which mentions white privilege as a concept.
 
This is just awful, vacuous nonsense

Clinton explained that she was working hard to change what she called "the country's original sin" and noted that the work for her was trying to figure out ways to "explain and sell" change "because in politics," she told the activists, "if you can't explain it and you can't sell it, it stays on the shelf."

Things took a turn when Clinton asked the activists to explain policy changes they wanted to see enacted.

"I stand here in your space and I say this as respectfully as I can, 'If you don't tell black people what we need to do, then we won't tell you all what to do.'" Jones said. "What I mean to say is, this is and has always been a white problem of violence. There's not much that we can do to stop the violence against us."

"Respectfully," Clinton answered, "if that is your position, then I will only talk to white people about how we are going to deal with these very real problems."

"That's not what I mean," Jones said. He added, "But what you just said was a form of victim-blaming. You were saying what the Black Lives Matter movement needs to do to change white hearts is to ..."

Clinton told them that she isn't interested in changing hearts, but rather policy.

"You can keep the movement going, which you have started, and through that you might change some hearts," she said.

"But if that's all that happens," she continued, "we'll be back here in 10 years having the same conversation because we will not have all of the changes that you deserve to see happen in your lifetime because of your willingness to get out there and talk about this."

Literally all these three seem to be interested in is in eliciting expressions of guilt from white liberals, pushing on open doors effectively. There is just nothing here, twitter accounts just blowing in the wind.
 
“There is another class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs -- partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.” - Booker T. Washington, late 1800s
 
Not only is Sanders a massive racist, but apparently he hates all women!

A better approach by the media to female candidates being asked daft questions might be to stop asking them. Maybe ask Clinton about her role in overthrowing a democratic government in Honduras that unleasheda wave of femicidal violence instead.
 
Not only is Sanders a massive racist, but apparently he hates all women!

A better approach by the media to female candidates being asked daft questions might be to stop asking them. Maybe ask Clinton about her role in overthrowing a democratic government in Honduras that unleasheda wave of femicidal violence instead.

Looks like a story by someone looking to create a story rather than report one.

Or, it could be that Sanders is sensitive to the question. His Einstein-like hair has been a running joke for years. It's only recently that its been tamed into any kind of order.

th
 
Last edited:
Looks like a story by someone looking to create a story rather than report one.

Or, it could be that Sanders is sensitive to the question. His Einstein-like hair has been a running joke for years. It's only recently that its been tamed into any kind of order.

Or an attempt by the reporter to give him a soft ball question, which he can then trot out the correct liberal progressive line on. But a failure to do clearly means he's telling women to shut up. :facepalm:
 
http://blackagendareport.com/blacklivesmatter_humiliated_by_Clinton

Hillary Clinton found it easy to reduce a #BlackLivesMatter delegation to “school children at an elementary civics class,” when they met with her last week. Clinton lectured the activists on the need to make demands on politicians, when all they wanted to do was talk about “what in your heart has changed that’s gonna change the direction of this country?” The #BLM set out on a path that leads inevitably to cooptation, and quickly arrived at public humiliation.
 
To put some meat on the bones of just why the Teach for America connection is problematic

In just over a decade — from 1996 to 2007 — the city managed to close 85% of the city’s public housing, adopting a system of “mixed-income” projects and vouchers instead. While liberals touted it as “deconcentration,” the removal project effectively (and efficiently) displaced low-income residents from areas ripe for profit-making. As a result, 16,000 families remain on the waitlist for subsidized housing.

It was the same story with public education. Within the first few months after the storm, nearly 7,500 predominantly black public school teachers were unilaterally fired, with no process or explanation, the first shot in a relentless battle to dismantle the city’s traditional public schools. In the next few years, education profiteers, led by Teach for America (TFA) and school privatization guru Paul Vallas, turned New Orleans schools into the first all-charter school system in the nation.

Today, 91% of all the city’s schools are charters. Though boosted through a language of choice and effectiveness, the charters provide neither. Public funds pay for a system that lacks oversight, transparency, and funnels millions of dollars to privateers, who pocket salaries upwards of $1 million.

...

There are clear lines connecting the Big Easy’s newfound “spirit of entrepreneurialism” to its post-Katrina restructuring, particularly the takeover of the city’s public schools. The US Chamber of Commerce has estimated that nearly half of all startups in New Orleans were founded by former TFA fellows, part of the nearly 30,000 new residents of the city.

College-educated millennials fresh off their two-year tour of what one TFA’er called “an alternative pathway to entrepreneurialism” have opted to stay and remake the city in their own image.

....

Manifested in companies with names like Launch Pad (whose owners provide management for the St Roch market) and Dinner Lab, founded by a TFA alum and launched with labor from Venture for America (a program that mimics not only the name, but also the entrepreneurial-generating model of TFA), backers of these new industries claim that economic recovery is, in fact, highly visible in the Crescent City. (Cummings has also caught the bug, investing in several freshman startups that are housed in his “Entrepreneurs’ Row” loft.)
 
Back
Top Bottom