J Ed
Follow Back Pro Expropriation
This whole bust up is really bizarre, and a lot of people seem to be wondering whether it has been orchestrated by the Clinton campaign.
http://www.vox.com/2015/7/20/9001639/bernie-sanders-black-lives-matter
So racial inequality and economic inequality are separate? What?
Meanwhile...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-clinton-said-it-black-lives-matter-no-hedge/
It almost seems as if the problem for a lot of people in regards to Sanders is that while Sanders frames white supremacy within its historical and economic context, Hillary is more than willing to simply parrot a meme and provide no actual answers or context or any indication that she will back any kind of policy to fight against white supremacy or police brutality beyond mouthing the right platitude. Her support for her husband's racist welfare and crime bills, coups against democratically elected 'business non-compliant' regimes... all forgotten.
http://www.vox.com/2015/7/20/9001639/bernie-sanders-black-lives-matter
Two Democratic candidates appeared at Netroots Nation on Saturday: Sanders and Martin O'Malley. (Hillary Clinton was invited, but declined the invitation.) O'Malley and Sanders made back-to-back appearances in a town hall–style session, moderated by journalist and immigration activist Jose Antonio Vargas.
Both Sanders and O'Malley are trying to win progressive support in the Democratic primary to become the alternative to Hillary Clinton. But only one of them has really succeeded: Sanders's candidacy has gained a lot of momentum, with huge events and the second-most money raised directly of any candidate (driven largely by small donations). O'Malley, on the other hand, hasn't been able to capture as much attention. In fact, he's faced something of an uphill battle with many progressives: O'Malley's political career started in Baltimore, where he was closely associated with the aggressive police tactics that were under protest after the death of Freddie Gray in police custody this spring.
Shortly after O'Malley took the stage, a group of protesters affiliated with the #BlackLivesMatter movement (which has been organizing for the last year or so to call attention to deaths of black men and women at the hands of police) marched into the room chanting "Which Side Are You On?" (a reference to an old-school labor song). Two women (Tia Oso and Patrisse Cullors) took the stage and the microphone and spoke about deaths of black men and women in police custody — specifically the recent suspicious death of Sandra Bland in Texas.
Ending the presentation, Cullors asked O'Malley to offer "concrete actions": "What will you do to stop police unions from battering our names after law enforcement kills us?" "And," she added, "we want to hear it from Bernie Sanders, too."
...
Sanders was defensive and cranky toward the protesters, saying "Black lives of course matter. But I've spent 50 years of my life fighting for civil rights. If you don't want me to be here, that's okay." At other times, he didn't acknowledge the protesters at all and raised his voice to be heard over them (which some attendees saw as Sanders "shouting down" the protesters).
Sanders didn't ignore the issue entirely. But to some observers, it felt like Sanders "stuck to his script" about economic injustice without giving racial injustice its due.
There is a legitimate disconnect between the way Sanders (and many of the economic progressives who support him) see the world, and the way many racial justice progressives see the world. To Bernie Sanders, as I've written, racial inequality is a symptom — but economic inequality is the disease. That's why his responses to unrest in Ferguson and Baltimore have included specific calls for police accountability, but have focused on improving economic opportunity for young African Americans. Sanders presents fixing unemployment as the systemic solution to the problem.
...
Whether you agree with Sanders's claim that he's been "fighting for civil rights for 50 years" depends on whether you think he's doing enough in his Senate career to put civil rights on the agenda. But the "50 years" part is true: He has admirable civil rights movement cred. Sanders was a member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, which helped coordinate much of the nonviolent action of the early 1960s, and he participated in the famous March for Jobs and Freedom in 1963, where Martin Luther King Jr. delivered the famous "I Have a Dream" speech.
Today, Sanders's supporters bring up his record in the civil rights movement in response to basically any criticism of his actions on racial equality. And when Sanders started catching criticism for his Netroots performance, the supporters were ready with their history. As comedy podcaster Roderick Morrow — who started the satirical #BernieSoBlack Twitter hashtag on Sunday — told Vox: "It seems like any time black people bring this up on Twitter, there's just all these people who, I don't know if they're just sitting around searching his name on Twitter or something, they just come and get in your mentions and start harassing you, saying the same things over and over to you."
But the civil rights movement references aren't actually an answer to his critics. No one is arguing that Sanders literally doesn't see race, they're saying that Sanders sees racial inequality as less important than economic inequality and shouldn't.
So racial inequality and economic inequality are separate? What?
Meanwhile...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...-clinton-said-it-black-lives-matter-no-hedge/
"Black lives matter." With those three little words, Clinton acknowledged that there are myriad ways that race continues to shape life in America that have almost no relationship to pocketbooks, educational credentials or class. There's ample evidence that income, education and the like do not deliver the same results in black lives that they do in others.
It almost seems as if the problem for a lot of people in regards to Sanders is that while Sanders frames white supremacy within its historical and economic context, Hillary is more than willing to simply parrot a meme and provide no actual answers or context or any indication that she will back any kind of policy to fight against white supremacy or police brutality beyond mouthing the right platitude. Her support for her husband's racist welfare and crime bills, coups against democratically elected 'business non-compliant' regimes... all forgotten.