Because all photos always look better when they've been pointlessly animated for a few seconds.Live Photos sounds a bit like Google's Auto Awesome thing to me. Is there something different?
As my colleague Sam Byford mused today in The Verge Slack room, "what’s the point of Cartier-Bresson capturing ‘the decisive moment’ if you can just scroll through a few seconds on either side and change the composition? The power of a photo is in what isn’t shown."
He's just another pointless Apple fanboy churning out uncritical shit in return for the benefits of being a favoured reporter by Apple.For in-store product launches, i'm sure that's true. I'm thinking more about all of the bloggers, especially business and tech bloggers who, instead of turning a thoughtful and critical eye on a corporate advertising show, basically turn into cheerleaders for the stuff they're supposed to be evaluating.
This idiot is a prime example.
This is a guy who's not only a blogger, but writes articles on the tech industry for outlets like Slate and the New York Times.
The ability to move the composition on a photo back in time if you slightly mistimed it would be fantastic. I'm not sure that is what's possible with this new Apple thingy.Because all photos always look better when they've been pointlessly animated for a few seconds.
Listen to this fucking idiot:
Never going to happenApple games console coming I heard! I think they should make a super console, sell it for a grand but make it with a super laser that can ready any disk, any game from any co sole already made! They would make a killing
>
> Apple TV - well now this was the most interesting part of the show. Streamlining services with some very cool Siri integration is pretty nice but the gaming and Apps is where I think it gets interesting. Apple now have a console to eat up all those casual iPhone gamers' eyeball time with. If they get quality IP like Bomberman on to it they're on to a winner (Transistor is EXCELLENT btw). Think this could be a bit play for the future of home gaming too; the next gen are likely to be no physical media, Netflix style delivery model using cloud computing for the gfx power. Apple are now positioned to take that on in a few years.
No, that's not true.,Also - I do wish everyone would stop rolling out that Jobs "if you see a stylus..." quote. He was talking about a small (3.5" screen) handheld device that was going up against the shitty resistive touch screen PDA's and smartphones available at the time. To use that quote years later against a device that is quite clearly designed for completely different tasks and situations is idiotic at best.
He got that totally wrong, just like he completely failed to understand the appeal of larger screen phones (which Apple eventually copied after Samsung had led the field) and smaller, sub 10" screen tablets (which Apple eventually copied too)."Who wants a stylus?" Jobs said while introducing the iPhone. "You have to get 'em, put 'em away, you lose 'em. Yuck! Nobody wants a stylus. So let's not use a stylus."
And here's why he remains an utter cunt in my book:Small tablets
Another epic Jobs rant came in October 2010, when he discussed his disdain for a new wave of smaller tablets coming to market.
On the company's earnings call with analysts, Jobs said the iPad's 10-inch screen was "the minimum size required to create great tablet apps."
He said even making images appear sharper on the screen wouldn't help smaller tablets become usable "unless your tablet also includes sandpaper, so that the user can sand down their fingers to around one quarter of the present size."
"There are clear limits of how close you can physically place elements on a touch screen before users cannot reliably tap, flick or pinch them," he said.
A year after Jobs died, Apple introduced the iPad mini -- by far the best-selling iPad in the company's lineup.
Big phones
During Apple's iPhone 4 "Antennagate" kerfuffle in 2010, Steve Jobs derided big phones.
When a reporter asked him whether Apple would consider making a bigger iPhone to improve antenna reliability, Jobs scoffed. He called Samsung's Galaxy S phones "Hummers."
"You can't get your hand around it," Jobs said. "No one's going to buy that."
Apple finally debuted a taller iPhone 5 a year after Jobs died, and a much larger iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus last year.
Steve Jobs on stylus: 'Over my dead body.' The Apple Pencil and four other things he would hate
Philanthropy
Among the first things Jobs did in his 1997 return to Apple (after he banished all styluses) was to end Apple's philanthropic giving programs. He said he wanted to bring Apple back to profitability, but he never reinstated the programs even after Apple posted some of the biggest profits ever recorded by a public company.
So the new Apple Stylus/pencil doesn't have to be be got out, never has to be put away and never gets lost? Glad you cleared that one up.A cunt he may have been, but no, in that instance he was quite clearly talking about the phone. Because, you know, he was introducing the phone.
The small tablet thing he was obviously wrong about. On "phablet" sized phones though I still agree with him. They're horrible.
It's not really news to say that he got things wrong. Not on this forum at leastSo the new Apple Stylus/pencil doesn't have to be be got out, never has to be put away and never gets lost? Glad you cleared that one up.
Look at what it will be used for - graphics work etc. almost inevitably at a desk. It is by no means essential to have it to use the Pro. He was quite clearly referring to the old style of PDA or Windows mobile phones that required you to use as stylus for the basic operation of them. For what he was talking about at the time he was 100% right.So the new Apple Stylus/pencil doesn't have to be be got out, never has to be put away and never gets lost? Glad you cleared that one up.
Blimey. The whole point of the iPad Pro is that it's portable, but it's great to see Apple have apparently fixed the problem of losing styluses and that Jobs was right all along.Look at what it will be used for - graphics work etc. almost inevitably at a desk.
*the slow steady sound of a head being banged against a brick wall*Blimey. The whole point of the iPad Pro is that it's portable, but it's great to see Apple have apparently fixed the problem of losing styluses and that Jobs was right all along.
No, it's you that's being ridiculously stubborn here with your blind Apple love. It's a stylus. They get lost. And that was one of the very reasons that Jobs derided them, and that remains the same whether you're using one on a teensy weensy phone or a five foot tablet. He was wrong, end of.*the slow steady sound of a head being banged against a brick wall*
The new Apple TV is by far the most advanced smart TV box of the lot and you'd expect that - it's far more ambitious than the others, it's so brand new it's not out for another month, and it's also a great deal more expensive.
You could buy a Chromecast for yourself and one each for four mates for the same price as the bottom-end new Apple TV and that's a big deal.
On the early evidence though it looks like it could be worth it if you're an 'Apple person'. If you're not an iTunes user though, and you don't have an iPhone, this thing is going to be a hard sell.
Do you really want to use Siri to control your TV though? We have our doubts - we certainly don't want to.
And do you want to use this as a games console instead of a PS4? Again, that's up for debate.
For us they look like features no one will ever use but ultimately you can't deny that the new Apple TV is a very impressive new product with some truly advanced new features that go way beyond what the other devices are capable of.
Winner: the new Apple TV is the king of the living room but we'd still choose the Chromecast
New Apple TV vs Chromecast vs Roku 3 vs Amazon Fire TV | TechRadar
It's going to be pretty tinny though, no?The one thing that pricked my ears about the iPad Pro was the apparent 4x loudness. We have an iPad Air, and it's surprisingly loud already. I can imagine that 4x that volume will sound pretty damn good!
I bought a high end Wacom A4 tablet in the hope it would be good for sketching, but I still find it easier to draw with a pen and paper and scan it in. It's good for retouching work though.One thing that stylus's have never done well is coped with pressure, and being used at an angle.
It will be interesting to see if they've improved on say for example, wacom stylus's which are pretty dire, despite being a market leader in stylus input for design.
It's going to be pretty tinny though, no?
Yeah, that big screen will be ruddy great for watching a film in bed (notwithstanding the annoyance of getting a table to stand up in exactly the right position when you're chilling horizontally!).The iPad Air sounds perfectly good enough for the odd bit of music and a film, impressive even. So if this is an improvement then I can't wait to hear it in action.
(Obviously I am not comparing it to a decent set of speakers or anything)
I bought a high end Wacom A4 tablet in the hope it would be good for sketching, but I still find it easier to draw with a pen and paper and scan it in. It's good for retouching work though.
Although I'm sure the pen will be buttery smooth on the iPad Pro, if it won't run Photoshop, I imagine it'll be pretty useless to most designers.
It's a stripped down version.I always found them good for retouching, but i knew illustrators who hated using them.
Didn't they demo a version of photoshop on the iPad pro too?
There's a lot of stuff in the full version that is rarely used.It's a stripped down version.
Yeah. I often use my iPad with the stripped down AutoCAD on site visits, it's OK to get basic bits down on site, then back at home it all gets moved onto the full version on a laptop for completion.There's a lot of stuff in the full version that is rarely used.
I guess it depends on what they've stripped out